Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Fletcher Building (FBU) / HY22

NPAT up 41.3% but NZ$1.5bn working-capital build cut operating cash 63%

Inventory rebuild and housing investment drove operating cash from NZ$428m to NZ$157m and stretched FCF dividend cover to 862.2%.

Construction & Materials / Building products and construction

FBU revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $2.9b, versus $7b in FY25.

FBU EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 FBU: Outside range high ebitda margin. 12.6%; 4-period range 10% to 12.4%. EBITDA margin: 12.6%, above normal range; 4-period mean 11.2%, range 10.0%-12.4%.
  • FY23 FBU: Outside range high ebitda margin. 13.6%; 3-period range 11% to 13%. EBITDA margin: 13.6%, above normal range; 3-period mean 12.2%, range 11.0%-13.0%.
  • FY24 FBU: Outside range low ebitda margin. 11%; 3-period range 12.7% to 13.6%. EBITDA margin: 11.0%, below normal range; 3-period mean 13.1%, range 12.7%-13.6%.
  • HY25 FBU: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 10%; 4-period range 10.7% to 12.6%. EBITDA margin: 10.0%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.8%, range 10.7%-12.6%.
EBITDA margin: 10.0%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.8%, range 10.7%-12.6%.

FBU operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $156m, versus $501m in FY25.

FBU working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 FBU: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $79m; 4-period range $409m to $1,629m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$79.0m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1093.5m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 FBU: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $949m; 4-period range $-473m to $129m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$949.0m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$70.0m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-249.0m.
  • HY24 FBU: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $1,629m; 4-period range $79m to $1,524m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1629.0m, above normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$706.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 FBU: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-473m; 4-period range $-25m to $949m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-473.0m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$363.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-25.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-473.0m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$363.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-25.0m.
Release date
16 February 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY22 vs HY21

Revenue

$4.1b

+1.9% ↑ vs $4b

EBITDA

$504m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$171m

+41.3% ↑ vs $121m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$157m

-63.3% ↓ vs $428m

Interim dividend per share

18.0c

+50.0% ↑ vs 12.0c

Operating profit

$289m

+21.9% ↑ vs $237m

Profit before tax

$237m

+30.9% ↑ vs $181m

Cash and cash equivalents

$409m

-33.8% ↓ vs $618m

What changed

Headline earnings strengthened while cash generation deteriorated sharply

Revenue rose 1.9% to NZ$4.1b, profit before tax grew 30.9% to NZ$237m, and NPAT rose 41.3% to NZ$171m. EBIT margin firmed 10bps to 8.2%. However, net cash from operating activities fell 63.3% from NZ$428m to NZ$157m, driven by an operating working-capital absorption of NZ$1.5b. Annolyse's historical baseline shows recent first-half periods averaged a NZ$732m working-capital build (range NZ$79m to NZ$1.6b), so this period sits at the upper edge of that range.

Capex rose 70.7% to NZ$140m (3.4% of revenue), pre-lease FCF compressed to NZ$17m from NZ$346m, and cash on hand fell from NZ$618m to NZ$409m. The interim dividend was lifted 50% to 18.0 cents per share. Gross borrowings declined modestly to NZ$866m.

What matters

Cash quality is the dominant tension

  • Operating cash fell NZ$271m year-on-year while NPAT rose NZ$50m. Debtor days at 49.1 sit above Annolyse's historical 3-period range (39.1 to 44.5 days, mean 41.9), and inventory days rose to 72.4 from 51.4. Inventories alone grew NZ$490m to NZ$1.6b. This means the earnings beat is being funded by the balance sheet, not generated through the P&L.
  • The dividend is no longer covered by cash this half. The 18.0c interim payout equals 85.7% of NPAT but 862.2% of pre-lease FCF, versus 81.6% and 28.6% respectively in HY21. Coverage depends entirely on a second-half cash recovery or a draw on the NZ$409m cash balance.
  • Tax flattered NPAT growth versus PBT. The current effective tax rate of 26.6% normalised against a prior-period rate of -31.5% (a tax benefit), opening a 10.4pp gap between PBT growth (30.9%) and NPAT growth (41.3%). PBT growth is the cleaner operating read.

Expectations

No forward target, forward-work order book, or quantified guidance is supplied

The supplied seasonality context shows HY21 contributed 49.1% of FY21 revenue but only 39.7% of FY21 NPAT and 48.1% of FY21 operating cash flow, implying a second-half-weighted earnings and cash pattern. On HY21 shape, FY22 revenue annualises around NZ$8.1bn.

The release confirms management flagged inventory rebuild and housing investment in advance, but does not quantify when, or how much, working capital will unwind. Without that, this result supports the margin and earnings narrative but does not support a view that pre-lease FCF will recover to FY21 levels.

Quality of result

Margin and earnings quality look durable on the supplied baseline: PBT margin at 5.8% and NPAT margin at 4.2% are both classified as unprecedented highs versus the recent four-period range, and ROE has lifted to 4.6% from 3.4%

Net debt to EBITDA of 0.9x is also unprecedented low against a 4-period mean of 3.48x, so leverage is not the pressure point.

Cash quality is where the result thins out. OCF/EBITDA of 31.2% sits at the upper edge of Annolyse's recent historical range, so the conversion ratio itself is not abnormal — but the prior comparable (HY21) was unusually strong in cash terms, and the year-on-year fall reflects a deliberate NZ$1.5bn inventory and housing investment cycle stacked on a 70.7% capex step-up. The earnings result is real, but the cash backing it has been deferred onto the balance sheet, so the read on durability depends on inventory turn and housing settlement timing rather than recurring trading cash.

Unresolved

Open questions

How much of the NZ$490m inventory build is expected to release in 2H, and over what timeframe?
Why did debtor days extend by 11.3 days, and is this collection slippage or mix?
Is the 50% increase in the interim dividend sustainable against pre-lease FCF of NZ$17m, or does it rely on a second-half cash inflection?
What is driving the NZ$5m loss in the Construction segment, and is further provisioning expected?
How does management reconcile the 70.7% capex step-up with the stated strong-cash-flow narrative?

This briefing cannot assess the timing or magnitude of the second-half working-capital unwind, segment-level prior-period comparables that were not disclosed, or any market-pricing context for the result.

Chat

Ask about FBU HY22

Ask follow-up questions about Fletcher Building's HY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about FBU HY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Fletcher Building's HY22 result.

How much of the NZ$490m inventory build is expected to release in 2H, and over what timeframe?Why does "Cash quality is the dominant tension" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY22?What should I watch next for FBU after HY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

2022 Interim Financial Results

HY22 / financial report↗

Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation

HY22 / results presentation↗

Stock Exchange Notice

HY22 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

2021 Interim Financial Results

HY21 / financial report↗

News Release HY21

HY21 / media release↗

Results Announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Annual Report 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

News Release

FY21 / media release↗

Results Announcement

FY21 / results announcement↗

Release context

Fletcher Building HY22 Results Webcast Details

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 31.2% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 10.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 72 days, +21 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 85.7%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when FBU publishes next

Get the next Fletcher Building briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.