Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (FPH) / FY25

Operating cash flow more than doubled to $548.6m as capex normalised

Revenue crossed $2.0bn for the first time and FCF reached 113.3% of NPAT, signalling earnings backed by cash after years of heavy capex.

Healthcare / Medical devices

FPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $2.3b, versus $1.1b in HY26.

FPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was 27.6%, versus 26.3% in HY26.

FPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $663.2m, versus $245.8m in HY26.

FPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 FPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $58.7m; 3-period range $-4.1m to $7.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$58.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY25 FPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-4.1m; 3-period range $-2.9m to $58.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Release date
28 May 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$2b

+27.8% ↑ vs $1.6b

Net profit after tax

$377.2m

+50.7% ↑ vs $250.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$548.6m

+130.3% ↑ vs $238.2m

Full-year dividend per share

42.5c

+84.8% ↑ vs 23.0c

Operating profit

$509.6m

+53.4% ↑ vs $332.2m

Profit before tax

$503.3m

+53.4% ↑ vs $328m

Cash and cash equivalents

$264.5m

+118.6% ↑ vs $121m

Total assets

$2.6b

+15.7% ↑ vs $2.2b

What changed

Operating cash flow more than doubled to $548.6m (+130.3%) while capex fell 51.3% to $103.0m, taking capex intensity from 13.4% to 5.1% of revenue and producing free cash flow of $427.1m at 113.3% of NPAT

This is the most material movement in the result because it inflects the cash profile of the business after several years of heavy plant investment. Revenue rose 27.8% to $2b – the group's first $2bn year – with Hospital revenue of $1.3b (63.3% mix) and Homecare of $739.9m. Profit before tax grew 53.4% to $503.3m and NPAT grew 50.7% to $377.2m. The net cash position widened from $37.7m to $200.5m.

What matters

Cash conversion stepped up sharply

Operating cash flow outpaced NPAT growth by roughly 2.5x (+130.3% versus +50.7%) and FCF coverage of 113.3% means reported earnings were fully backed by cash this period. For an investor, this matters because it removes the question of whether the profit step-up is accrual-driven – in aggregate, it is not.

Capex intensity has reset. Capital spend dropped from 13.4% to 5.1% of revenue. The release does not characterise this as a new structural level, so it could reflect timing between investment cycles rather than a permanent lower run rate. If the lower intensity persists, the FCF profile changes materially; if another build wave is required to support volumes, FY25 FCF will overstate the steady state.

Working capital is sending mixed signals. Receivable days lengthened by 6.0 days to 47.5 while inventory days fell 22.5 to 61.9. The inventory unwind contributed positively to cash this year and is not repeatable at the same magnitude. The debtor stretch is the more concerning of the two – it implies tighter cash dynamics in FY26 if the trend continues.

Expectations

No explicit forward targets were supplied

The first-half shape (HY25 revenue of $951.2m at 47.1% of the full year, NPAT of $153.2m at 40.6%) shows a clearly second-half-weighted year, with implied H2 revenue of $1.1b and H2 NPAT of $224.0m. That weighting is consistent with sequential momentum through the period, but without management guidance there is no quantified bar to test against. The $2bn revenue milestone and the H2 exit rate set the read for FY26 directionally; neither is a target.

Quality of result

The result is high-quality on the cash and balance-sheet axes

FCF at 113.3% of NPAT, net cash of $200.5m (versus $37.7m), and ROE at 20.0% (versus 14.3%) all point to durable improvement rather than one-period accounting effects. Capex normalisation is the only meaningful timing-versus-structural question and it cuts both ways: if structural, FY25 FCF understates the new run rate; if cyclical, FY25 overstates it.

The tax line introduces a small distortion. The effective tax rate moved from 23.7% to 25.1%, which is why NPAT growth (50.7%) lagged PBT growth (53.4%) by 2.7 percentage points. PBT is the cleaner operating read. On working capital, the inventory unwind (22.5 fewer days of inventory) contributed materially to the cash result and will not repeat at this magnitude. Receivable lengthening (+6.0 days) is a yellow flag for FY26 cash conversion. The full-year dividend of 42.5cps (final component 24.0cps) implies a payout ratio of 66.0% of NPAT (versus 53.1% prior), which is well-covered by FCF at 58.3%.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the six-day increase in receivable days, and is it customer-mix, geographic-mix, or payment-terms-driven?
Is the step-down in capex to 5.1% of revenue the new normalised level, or does the next phase of capacity require another investment wave?
How much of the inventory unwind that lifted FY25 cash is repeatable into FY26?
Why did the effective tax rate move from 23.7% to 25.1%, and is the current level the steady state?
Will the payout ratio remain near 66.0% of NPAT, or revert toward the prior 53.1% as cash priorities evolve?

This briefing cannot assess product-level demand dynamics or constant-currency growth contributions beyond what the canonical extraction supplies.

Chat

Ask about FPH FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about FPH FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's FY25 result.

What drove the six-day increase in receivable days, and is it customer-mix, geographic-mix, or payment-terms-driven?Why does "Cash conversion stepped up sharply" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for FPH after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Record full-year revenue result for FPH

FY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

FY23 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

FY23 Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

FY23 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Interim context

Interim Report 2025

HY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Release context

2024 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting Speech and Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

FPH provides 1H25 guidance and updates FY25 outlook

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 2.7pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 27.8% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 45.9%, with NPAT payout at 66.0%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 20.0%, +5.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when FPH publishes next

Get the next Fisher & Paykel Healthcare briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.