Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (FPH) / HY24

Capex doubled to 34.3% of revenue, pre-lease FCF swung to NZ$127.5m negative

Revenue grew 16.4% and PBT 23.0%, but a doubled capex bill drove pre-lease FCF NZ$258.5m below the historical mean and left the dividend uncovered.

Healthcare / Medical devices

FPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $2.3b, versus $1.1b in HY26.

FPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was 27.6%, versus 26.3% in HY26.

FPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $663.2m, versus $245.8m in HY26.

FPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 FPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $58.7m; 3-period range $-4.1m to $7.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$58.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY25 FPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-4.1m; 3-period range $-2.9m to $58.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Release date
29 November 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$803.7m

+16.4% ↑ vs $690.6m

Net profit after tax

$107.3m

+11.9% ↑ vs $95.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$156.5m

n/m ↑ vs $1.9m

Interim dividend per share

18.0c

+2.9% ↑ vs 17.5c

Operating profit

$152.6m

+20.4% ↑ vs $126.7m

Profit before tax

$140.6m

+23.0% ↑ vs $114.3m

Total assets

$2.4b

+14.1% ↑ vs $2.1b

What changed

Pre-lease free cash flow was NZ$-127.5m, swinging from NZ$39.6m in the prior comparable period and sitting below Annolyse's historical baseline of NZ$131.0m (range NZ$39.6m–NZ$184.0m)

The driver was capex of NZ$275.5m, up 120.8% on HY23 and equivalent to 34.3% of revenue, against operating cash flow of NZ$156.5m. Gross borrowings rose to NZ$243.2m from NZ$112.4m, funding the gap while the board lifted the interim dividend 2.9% to 18.0 cents.

Underlying trading was strong on the P&L. Revenue grew 16.4% to NZ$803.7m, Hospital +11% and Homecare +26%, with gross margin up 65bps to 60.0%. PBT rose 23.0% to NZ$140.6m, but NPAT growth was held to 11.9% because the effective tax rate normalised from 16.1% to 23.7%, a 7.6pp tax-line headwind.

What matters

Cash quality is decoupling from earnings

  • PBT grew 23.0% while pre-lease FCF turned NZ$167.1m more negative year-on-year. Capex intensity of 34.3% of revenue (vs 18.1% prior) is the swing factor, so investors need to know whether this is a discrete capacity build that ends, or a new baseline. Until that is clear, headline earnings growth overstates the cash return on this period's trading.
  • Tax, not operations, explains the NPAT lag. The PBT-to-NPAT growth gap of 11.1pp is entirely a tax-rate effect (16.1% → 23.7%), and the current rate sits inside Annolyse's historical baseline of 16.1%–25.8%. PBT growth of 23.0% is the cleaner read on operating momentum; the optical NPAT slowdown should not be confused with margin pressure.
  • Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is suppressed because the source-backed cash-dividend bridge is unavailable.

Expectations

No quantitative guidance or targets are provided

Historically the business is second-half weighted: HY23 represented 43.7% of FY23 revenue and 38.3% of FY23 NPAT, implying an H2 of NZ$890.5m revenue and NZ$154.4m NPAT in that period. On that shape, the current half points to an annualised revenue run-rate of roughly NZ$1.6bn before any H2 step-up, which would mark a clear recovery from FY23.

Management commentary cites "stable ordering patterns" in Hospital. The release does not, however, indicate whether the doubled capex programme continues at this intensity in H2, which is the single most important variable for full-year free cash flow.

Quality of result

The earnings beat is genuine at the gross-margin and PBT line, but the cash result is lower quality than the OCF swing from NZ$1.9m to NZ$156.5m suggests

Inventory days fell from 105.1 to 81.6 — within Annolyse's historical range but at the lower end — releasing stock built up in the prior period. Operating working-capital movement was a NZ$2.9m release versus a historical pattern where two of the three comparable halves showed builds averaging NZ$33.0m. That is a favourable, non-repeatable contribution to OCF, and the prior comparable's NZ$1.9m OCF was itself depressed by an unusually heavy inventory build, exaggerating the year-on-year delta.

PBT margin of 17.5% sits at the lower edge of the historical 16.6%–26.1% baseline (mean 21.4%), and ROE at 6.1% is below the historical range of 6.5%–10.9%. So while gross margin expanded, returns on the enlarged asset base (total assets up 14.1% to NZ$2.4b) have not yet followed. Trade debtors rose 23.0% with debtor days at 42.8 (upper edge of the 40.5–42.9 historical range), a modest receivables drag worth monitoring.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected capex run-rate for H2 FY24 and FY25, and what specific capacity programmes is the NZ$275.5m supporting?
Will the inventory unwind that boosted H1 OCF reverse as Homecare demand (+26%) requires restocking?
Why did the effective tax rate step up to 23.7%, and is this the new steady-state rate or a one-off jurisdictional mix effect?
How does the board reconcile a 97.3% NPAT payout and -82.2% FCF payout with rising gross borrowings of NZ$243.2m?
Is Hospital growth of 11% the durable trend, or are comparison effects against pandemic-era ordering still distorting the year-on-year picture?

This briefing cannot assess whether the elevated capex represents a finite capacity expansion or a structurally higher reinvestment rate, which is the central question for free cash flow normalisation.

Chat

Ask about FPH HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about FPH HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's HY24 result.

What is the expected capex run-rate for H2 FY24 and FY25, and what specific capacity programmes is the NZ$275.5m supporting?Why does "Cash quality is decoupling from earnings" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for FPH after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Report 2024

HY24 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY24 / results presentation↗

News Release

HY24 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Report 2023

HY23 / financial report↗

News Release

HY23 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results release↗

FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

Release context

2023 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting Speech and Presentation

HY24 / commentary↗

FPH provides guidance for first half of FY24

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 11.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 16.4% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 97.3%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 6.1%, -0.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when FPH publishes next

Get the next Fisher & Paykel Healthcare briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.