Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (FPH) / HY25

FPH PBT up 46.8% as capex normalisation swings FCF positive

Operating leverage delivered above-baseline earnings growth while capex falling 80% to NZ$55.1m rebuilt FPH into a net cash position.

Healthcare / Medical devices

FPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $2.3b, versus $1.1b in HY26.

FPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was 27.6%, versus 26.3% in HY26.

FPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $663.2m, versus $245.8m in HY26.

FPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 FPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $58.7m; 3-period range $-4.1m to $7.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$58.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY25 FPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-4.1m; 3-period range $-2.9m to $58.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.1m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$33.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.9m.
Release date
28 November 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$951.2m

+18.4% ↑ vs $803.7m

Net profit after tax

$153.2m

+42.8% ↑ vs $107.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$233m

+48.9% ↑ vs $156.5m

Interim dividend per share

18.5c

+2.8% ↑ vs 18.0c

Operating profit

$218.1m

+42.9% ↑ vs $152.6m

Profit before tax

$206.4m

+46.8% ↑ vs $140.6m

Cash and cash equivalents

$116.6m

+65.4% ↑ vs $70.5m

Total assets

$2.4b

+1.9% ↑ vs $2.4b

What changed

Revenue grew 18.4% to NZ$951.2m and PBT grew 46.8% to NZ$206.4m, with NPAT up 42.8% to NZ$153.2m

Annolyse's historical baseline shows all three growth rates as above the normal range: revenue against a 3-period mean of 2.5% (range -23.3% to 16.4%), PBT against a mean of -0.5%, and NPAT against a mean of -2.0%. Operating profit of NZ$218.1m rose 42.9%, and PBT margin at 21.7% sits inside the supplied historical band of 16.6%-26.1%.

Pre-lease free cash flow swung from -NZ$127.5m to +NZ$169.4m, the upper edge of the supplied historical range (3-period mean NZ$34.9m). That swing reflects operating cash inflow of NZ$233.0m (up 48.9%) combined with capex falling 80% from NZ$275.5m to NZ$55.1m. Gross borrowings fell 72.6% to NZ$66.6m, taking FPH from NZ$172.7m of net debt into a net cash position of approximately NZ$50.0m.

What matters

Top-line acceleration is well above the company's recent baseline

  • Revenue growth of 18.4% is 15.9 percentage points above the 3-period mean and exceeds the prior peak of 16.4% in the supplied window. Coupled with PBT growth of 46.8%, the result indicates meaningful operating leverage: PBT margin moved to 21.7% from 17.5%, even as the effective tax rate rose to 25.8% from 23.7%.
  • The cash and leverage transformation is largely a capex-cycle effect. Capex/revenue dropped from 34.3% to 5.8%, which is the dominant driver of the NZ$296.9m pre-lease FCF swing. The prior comparable was distorted by elevated property and plant spend, so the current FCF figure should not be read as a steady-state run rate.
  • Capital allocation is more conservative than headline FCF suggests. The interim dividend rose only 2.8% to 18.5 cents per share, taking the payout to 70.6% of NPAT versus 97.3% prior - the lower edge of the supplied historical range (mean 85.0%). Management is retaining a larger share of earnings even as cover from FCF improved sharply.

Expectations

No stated targets or constant-currency figures are provided in the supplied excerpts, so the read is anchored to FY24 shape rather than guidance

In FY24, HY24 represented 50.8% of full-year revenue and 42.9% of full-year NPAT, indicating a second-half-weighted earnings profile. If that shape holds, the HY25 base annualises to NZ$1.9b revenue, and 2H NPAT would be expected to exceed 1H.

The current release does support a step-change in the revenue trajectory and a normalised capex base, but it does not confirm whether 1H demand strength was front-loaded or sustainable. The supplied excerpts reference an updated full-year outlook but do not quantify it, which leaves forward shape uncertain.

Quality of result

Operating earnings quality looks high: PBT growth (46.8%) exceeds NPAT growth (42.8%) by only 4.0 percentage points, with the small gap explained by the higher effective tax rate (25.8% versus 23.7%, above the supplied 16.1%-24.9% range)

PBT is therefore the cleaner read, and it confirms that the headline NPAT lift is operating, not tax-aided.

Cash quality is more nuanced. Operating cash flow growth of 48.9% outpaced PBT growth, helped by working capital easing - inventory days fell to 63.7 from 81.5 (lower edge of the supplied historical range), unwinding NZ$27.4m of inventory. Debtor days at 40.7 are also at the lower edge of the historical range. These working-capital tailwinds support the period but are unlikely to repeat at the same magnitude. The NZ$220.4m year-on-year capex reduction is the single largest item flattering FCF/NPAT to 110.6%, and that ratio will compress as capex normalises further. ROE at 7.9% remains at the lower edge of the supplied 6.5%-12.2% range despite the earnings rebound, reflecting the equity build (total equity up 10.2%).

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the underlying capex run-rate now that the prior elevated cycle has rolled off, and how should investors think about steady-state FCF conversion?
How much of the 18.4% revenue lift came from constant-currency volume versus price and FX, given disclosed material FX exposure?
Why did the effective tax rate move above the supplied historical range to 25.8%, and is that the new base?
Will the more conservative payout ratio (70.6% of NPAT) be maintained as earnings normalise, or is it transitional given the balance-sheet rebuild?
What does the updated full-year outlook referenced in the release imply for second-half growth versus the FY24 second-half-weighted shape?

This briefing cannot assess segment-level revenue or margin trends for HY25, as current-period Hospital and Homecare splits are not present in the supplied data.

Chat

Ask about FPH HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about FPH HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Fisher & Paykel Healthcare's HY25 result.

What is the underlying capex run-rate now that the prior elevated cycle has rolled off, and how should investors think about steady-state FCF conversion?Why does "Top-line acceleration is well above the company's recent baseline" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for FPH after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Report 2025

HY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Report 2024

HY24 / financial report↗

News Release

HY24 / media release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

FY23 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

FY23 Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

FY23 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Release context

2024 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting Speech and Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

FPH provides 1H25 guidance and updates FY25 outlook

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 4.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 18.4% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 51.7%, with NPAT payout at 70.6%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 7.9%, +1.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when FPH publishes next

Get the next Fisher & Paykel Healthcare briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.