Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Goodman Property Trust (GMT) / HY26

Borrowings cut 76% via Highbrook Fund deal as PBT grew 17.1%

A 0.6% effective tax rate lifted NPAT 35.8%, but the cleaner 17.1% PBT growth and 5.2% like-for-like rental uplift set the operating read.

Property / Property trust

GMT metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.
Release date
20 November 2025
Published
21 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$148.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$61.8m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$75.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

1.7c

+5.0% ↑ vs 1.6c

Operating profit

$83.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$62.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$531.8m

n/m ↑ vs $10.9m

Total assets

$4.1b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

What changed

Goodman Property Trust's result was reshaped by a major balance-sheet event

Gross borrowings fell to $698.8m from $2.9b a 76.2% reduction while cash rose to $531.8m from $10.9m, leaving net debt at roughly $167.0m versus $2.9b in the prior comparable. Revenue rose 10.4% to $148.8m and profit before tax grew 17.1% to $62.2m, supported by like-for-like rental growth of 5.2% and new management-fee income from the Highbrook Fund. Reported NPAT rose 35.8% to $61.8m, but that headline was flattered by an effective tax rate of 0.6% versus 14.3% in HY25. The interim distribution was lifted 5.0% to 1.70625 cents per unit, and operating cash flow rose 8.6% to $75.9m.

What matters

The Highbrook Fund transaction has reshaped the equity story

Total assets fell 14.0% to $4.1b and total liabilities fell 42.4% to $939.7m, rotating GMT from a directly held, debt-financed property book toward a lighter balance sheet with $531.8m of cash and an external management-fee revenue stream. This means structurally lower interest cost going forward, but a portion of future earnings now depends on the performance of a fund GMT manages rather than wholly owned property.

PBT is the cleaner operating read. NPAT growth of 35.8% sits 18.7 percentage points above PBT growth of 17.1% solely because the effective tax rate collapsed from 14.3% to 0.6%. Underlying operating progress is the 17.1% PBT improvement, supported by 5.2% like-for-like rental growth and operating earnings after tax of $65.8m versus $62.1m. Modelling NPAT growth at headline rates would overstate forward earnings power.

Capex collapsed to near-zero. Cash capex on investment properties and PP&E was about $0.03m against $56.1m a year earlier, reflecting a deliberate development pause and the fund-related asset rotation rather than ongoing portfolio reinvestment. This materially flatters reported free cash flow optics.

Expectations

The supplied shape context shows HY25 represented 48.5% of FY25 revenue and 41.5% of FY25 NPAT, making the trust modestly second-half-weighted

Annualising HY26 revenue gives $297.6m versus FY25's $277.9m, broadly consistent with the company's reaffirmed cash earnings guidance and stated full-year distribution guidance in line with the 3.4125 cents per unit announced for HY26. No specific revenue or earnings target is provided in extraction, so the read on second-half shape hinges on whether like-for-like rental growth holds and Highbrook Fund management fees scale as expected. The release does not quantify either, which limits forward conviction beyond the reaffirmed cash earnings target.

Quality of result

The operating engine looks durable: like-for-like rental growth of 5.2% is consistent with property income momentum, and operating cash flow rose 8.6% to $75.9m

However, OCF growth lagged PBT growth of 17.1%, so cash conversion deteriorated relative to the operating earnings line. The very high FCF-to-NPAT ratio of 122.7% is balance-sheet assisted rather than evidence of stronger organic conversion: capex of $0.03m versus $56.1m last year reflects a paused development pipeline, not improved operating cash generation. The tax benefit driving NPAT growth is also unlikely to repeat at the same scale; a 0.6% effective rate should not be treated as a run-rate, and applying a more normal rate to PBT would compress reported NPAT growth materially.

The reduction in gross borrowings to $698.8m and the cash build to $531.8m do structurally lower interest expense and improve debt headroom, which is a genuine quality improvement provided the proceeds are deployed productively. Reported NPAT growth of 35.8% should therefore be read against the 17.1% PBT advance.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the recurring run-rate of management-fee income from the Highbrook Fund, and how sensitive is it to fund leverage, valuations, and investor flows?
Why did the effective tax rate fall from 14.3% to 0.6%, and what rate should be modelled for FY26 and beyond?
How will the $531.8m cash balance be deployed across further debt repayment, development restart, or distributions?
When does the development pipeline restart, and what capex intensity should investors expect once it does?
Is the 5.2% like-for-like rental growth representative of the post-transaction portfolio mix, or skewed by assets no longer wholly owned?

This briefing cannot assess the financial performance of the Highbrook Fund itself, the precise valuation mechanics of the transaction, or the trajectory of capitalisation rates and independent asset values, none of which are quantified in the supplied data.

Chat

Ask about GMT HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Goodman Property Trust's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about GMT HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Goodman Property Trust's HY26 result.

What is the recurring run-rate of management-fee income from the Highbrook Fund, and how sensitive is it to fund leverage, valuations, and investor flows?Why does "The Highbrook Fund transaction has reshaped the equity story" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for GMT after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

GMT achieves earnings targets and delivers interim profit of $61.8 million

HY26 / results release↗

GMT and GMT Bond Issuer Interim Report 2026

HY26 / financial report↗

GMT Interim Results Presentation 2026

HY26 / results presentation↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

GMT and GMT Bond Issuer Interim Report 2025

HY25 / financial report↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Full-year context

GMT’s 2025 Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

Release context

GMT Annual Meeting - Voting Result

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 18.7pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 42.4%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 10.4% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when GMT publishes next

Get the next Goodman Property Trust briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.