Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Genesis Energy (GNE) / HY25

NPAT up 83.6% but cash conversion fell to 58.3% with leverage at 6.6x

Pre-lease free cash flow of NZ$46.0m sits well below the NZ$191.7m historical mean and the dividend exceeds NPAT at a 109.7% payout.

Energy & Utilities / Integrated gentailer

GNE revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.5b, versus $3.7b in FY25.

GNE EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 GNE: Outside range high ebitda margin. 25.8%; 3-period range 12.3% to 19.7%. EBITDA margin: 25.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 15.6%, range 12.3%-19.7%.
  • HY25 GNE: Outside range low ebitda margin. 12.3%; 3-period range 14.8% to 25.8%. EBITDA margin: 12.3%, below normal range; 3-period mean 20.1%, range 14.8%-25.8%.
EBITDA margin: 12.3%, below normal range; 3-period mean 20.1%, range 14.8%-25.8%.

GNE operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $264m, versus $311.7m in FY25.

GNE working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 GNE: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-424.2m; 3-period range $-360.4m to $160.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-424.2m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$95.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-360.4m.
  • HY26 GNE: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $160.7m; 3-period range $-424.2m to $29.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$160.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$29.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-392.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$160.7m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$29.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-392.3m.
Release date
21 February 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$1.8b

+28.9% ↑ vs $1.4b

Net profit after tax

$70.3m

+83.6% ↑ vs $38.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$126.3m

-40.1% ↓ vs $210.8m

Interim dividend per share

7.1c

+1.9% ↑ vs 7.0c

EBITDAF

$216.5m

n/m ↑ vs $0.2m

Operating profit

$133.3m

+40.9% ↑ vs $94.6m

Profit before tax

$93.7m

+75.1% ↑ vs $53.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$102m

+46.8% ↑ vs $69.5m

What changed

Revenue rose 28.9% to NZ$1,761.2m, but EBITDAF gained only about 7% to NZ$216.5m as gross margin compressed 485 basis points to 23.2%

Below the line, NPAT grew 83.6% to NZ$70.3m and PBT grew 75.1% to NZ$93.7m, helped by a lower effective tax rate of 25.0% versus 28.4%.

The cash side moved the other way. Operating cash flow fell 40.1% to NZ$126.3m, dragging OCF/EBITDAF cash conversion to 58.3% — below the historical range and well under the three-period mean of 88.9% (range 75.3%–104.3%). Pre-lease free cash flow of NZ$46.0m sits NZ$145.7m below the NZ$191.7m baseline.

Net debt rose to NZ$1.4b and net debt/EBITDAF reached 6.6x, above the recent range and the 5.13x mean. The interim dividend lifted to 7.13 cents from 7.00 cents, taking the NPAT payout to 109.7%.

What matters

Cash quality has decoupled from reported earnings

OCF/EBITDAF of 58.3% is the weakest of the four-period set and 30.6 percentage points below the historical baseline of 88.9%. With NPAT up 83.6% but operating cash flow down 40.1%, the headline earnings growth overstates underlying cash generation, and pre-lease FCF/NPAT of 65.4% does not cover the dividend.

Leverage is rising into a heavier capex cycle. Net debt/EBITDAF at 6.6x is above the historical band, with capex up 96.7% to NZ$65.5m (3.7% of revenue) as renewable and flexible generation projects are progressed. Funding the dividend at 109.7% of NPAT alongside an expanding investment programme leaves little internal slack and increases reliance on debt or hybrid capacity.

Earnings growth was not driven by the operating margin. EBITDAF grew only 7% on a 28.9% revenue lift, and EBITDAF margin of 12.3% is 7.8 percentage points below the historical mean of 20.1%, consistent with the sector's higher wholesale and fuel costs. The reported PBT and NPAT lift therefore depends on items below EBITDAF — including a more favourable tax rate — rather than gross-margin recovery.

Expectations

No quantitative target was supplied

The supplied second-half shape from FY24 shows the prior first half delivered 44.8% of full-year revenue, 49.6% of EBITDAF and just 29.2% of NPAT, so the business is structurally H2-weighted on profit. Annualising current revenue gives NZ$3.5b, modestly above the NZ$3b FY24 outturn, but that says little about full-year EBITDAF given hydrology, hedge cycles and fuel cost variability are not disclosed for H2.

The release does not provide guidance, hydrology assumptions or hedge-position commentary, so the gap between reported NPAT strength and weak cash generation cannot be calibrated to a specific full-year shape from the supplied disclosure alone.

Quality of result

A meaningful share of the reported earnings improvement looks timing- and tax-assisted rather than operationally durable

The effective tax rate at 25.0% is below the historical 28.7% mean and contributed to the 8.5 percentage-point gap between PBT growth (75.1%) and NPAT growth (83.6%). EBITDAF margin remains below the historical range, so the lift in operating profit is not coming from gross-margin repair.

On the cash side, working capital absorbed NZ$29.5m — at the upper edge of the historical range and NZ$159.4m above the historical mean of an NZ$129.9m release. Trade debtors rose 9.0% and inventories rose 6.4% in dollar terms even as debtor and inventory days fell, so the absorption is volume-driven rather than collection deterioration. Capex roughly doubled, taking pre-lease FCF to NZ$46.0m versus the NZ$191.7m three-period baseline. Until cash conversion normalises, the durable read is closer to PBT growth and the gross-margin trajectory than to the headline NPAT figure.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove cash conversion to 58.3% versus a 88.9% historical mean — wholesale receivable timing, hedge settlements, fuel inventory, or tax payments?
How is the board justifying a dividend at 109.7% of NPAT when pre-lease FCF of NZ$46.0m does not cover the distribution?
Why did EBITDAF rise only 7% while operating profit rose 40.9% and PBT rose 75.1% — what fair-value or non-cash items sit between EBITDAF and reported profit?
Is net debt/EBITDAF at 6.6x within covenant headroom, and what is the funding plan for the renewable and flexible generation programme as capex scales?
Will the lower 25.0% effective tax rate persist, or should HY25 be treated as a one-off tax benefit?

This briefing cannot assess hydrology, hedge book positioning, or wholesale price assumptions for H2, all of which are central to whether the cash-conversion gap closes.

Chat

Ask about GNE HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Genesis Energy's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about GNE HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Genesis Energy's HY25 result.

What specifically drove cash conversion to 58.3% versus a 88.9% historical mean — wholesale receivable timing, hedge settlements, fuel inventory, or tax payments?Why does "Cash quality has decoupled from reported earnings" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for GNE after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

2025 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

H1 FY25 - NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

H1 FY25 Market Statement

HY25 / results release↗

H1 FY25 Results Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

2024 Interim Report

HY24 / financial report↗

H1 FY24 - NZX Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

H1 FY24 - NZX Results Announcement

HY24 / results release↗

Full-year context

company filing

FY24 / results announcement↗

Genesis FY24 Integrated Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Genesis FY24 Market Release

FY24 / results release↗

Release context

Genesis Energy H1 FY25 Conference Call Details

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 58.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -46.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 8.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 6.60x, +0.20x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 109.7%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when GNE publishes next

Get the next Genesis Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.