Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Goodman Property Trust (GNZ) / HY26

Gross borrowings fell 53% as PBT rose 17.1% on issuer transition

Cash rose to $531.8m and total assets fell $663.1m, signalling a material balance sheet reshape that complicates the like-for-like read.

Property / Property trust

GNZ revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $148.8m, versus $277.9m in FY25.

GNZ Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 55.9%, versus 55.5% in FY25.

GNZ operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $75.9m, versus $161.3m in FY25.

GNZ NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $61.8m, versus $109.6m in FY25.
Release date
20 November 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$148.8m

+10.4% ↑ vs $134.8m

Net profit after tax

$61.8m

+35.8% ↑ vs $45.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$75.9m

+8.6% ↑ vs $69.9m

Interim dividend per share

1.7c

+5.0% ↑ vs 1.6c

Operating profit

$83.2m

+10.5% ↑ vs $75.3m

Profit before tax

$62.2m

+17.1% ↑ vs $53.1m

Cash and cash equivalents

$531.8m

n/m ↑ vs $10.9m

Total assets

$4.1b

-14.0% ↓ vs $4.7b

What changed

The dominant change is balance sheet, not income statement

Gross borrowings fell from $1.5b to $698.8m (-52.7%), cash and equivalents jumped from $10.9m to $531.8m, and total assets contracted by $663.1m to $4.1b. Net debt collapsed from roughly $1.5b to $167.0m. This sits alongside an issuer transition flag, indicating the period is not a clean like-for-like comparison.

On the income statement, revenue rose 10.4% to $148.8m, PBT rose 17.1% to $62.2m, and NPAT rose 35.8% to $61.8m. Operating cash flow rose 8.6% to $75.9m. The interim distribution per unit rose 5.0% to 1.70625 cents, with the release referencing 3.4125 cents per unit on a fuller basis.

What matters

The balance sheet has been re-based

A near-$779m reduction in gross borrowings funded by a $521m cash build and a $663m asset reduction points to material asset rotation, consistent with the release's reference to management fee income from the Highbrook Fund. This matters because forward earnings will increasingly reflect a manager-of-capital model (fee streams from co-owned funds) rather than pure direct property ownership, changing both the earnings mix and the asset-intensity of the trust.

NPAT growth overstates the operating read. The effective tax rate dropped from 14.3% to 0.6%, so the +35.8% headline NPAT move is tax-assisted. PBT growth of +17.1% is the cleaner operating read, and even that is helped by the 10.4% revenue uplift that includes new fee income. Investors should anchor to PBT, the disclosed 5.2% like-for-like rental growth, and management's cited 6.7% rise in cash earnings per unit rather than the statutory NPAT line.

Operating cash flow lagged earnings. OCF grew 8.6% against PBT growth of 17.1%, so cash conversion relative to operating earnings deteriorated this half. With capex roughly halved to $28.0m (-50.1%), FCF before lease payments rose to $47.9m and FCF/NPAT improved to 77.5%, but the underlying driver is lower investment spend rather than stronger cash generation from rents.

Expectations

No quantitative forward target is provided in the supplied data, and the issuer transition makes second-half shape comparisons less reliable

Using the FY25 split as a rough anchor, HY25 was 48.5% of FY25 revenue and 41.5% of FY25 NPAT, implying a modestly second-half-weighted profile historically. Annualising the current half gives revenue of $297.6m, ahead of FY25's $277.9m, but this includes new fee income whose run-rate is not disclosed here.

The release reaffirms full-year guidance for distributions and references continued like-for-like rental growth. Without a numeric guidance figure in the data, the half supports the qualitative reaffirmation but does not allow an independent test of the full-year shape.

Quality of result

The recurring rental engine looks intact: 5.2% like-for-like rental growth and 10.4% top-line growth provide a real underlying lift, and PBT growth of 17.1% confirms operating leverage on that base

NTA is reported at $2.03 per share and total equity rose marginally to $3.1b, so the balance sheet repositioning has not eroded book value.

Set against that, the headline NPAT growth is partly a tax artefact (effective rate 0.6% versus 14.3%), cash conversion slipped relative to earnings, and the FCF improvement is dominated by a halving of capex rather than stronger operating cash. The deleveraging is genuine and durable, but it has been delivered through asset rotation rather than retained earnings, so the trust is exchanging direct rental income for a mix of rental plus fund management fees. Quality of the result therefore depends heavily on the economics of that fee stream, which are not disclosed in the supplied materials.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the run-rate and margin of the Highbrook Fund management fee income, and how much of HY26 revenue growth does it represent?
How will the $531.8m cash balance be deployed, and over what timeframe, between development, further fund seeding, and capital return?
Why did the statutory effective tax rate fall to 0.6% this half, and is this repeatable or a one-off arising from the issuer transition?
Is the lower capex run-rate ($28.0m versus $56.1m) a deliberate slowdown in development, or timing within the existing pipeline?
What is the sustainable pace of like-for-like rental growth given the commentary that occupier demand has been "relatively stable this year"?

This briefing cannot assess the economics of the Highbrook Fund arrangement, the durability of the lower effective tax rate, or the intended use of the rebuilt cash balance from the supplied disclosures.

Chat

Ask about GNZ HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Goodman Property Trust's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about GNZ HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Goodman Property Trust's HY26 result.

What is the run-rate and margin of the Highbrook Fund management fee income, and how much of HY26 revenue growth does it represent?Why does "The balance sheet has been re-based" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for GNZ after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

GMT achieves earnings targets and delivers interim profit of $61.8 million

HY26 / results release↗

GMT and GMT Bond Issuer Interim Report 2026

HY26 / financial report↗

GMT Interim Results Presentation 2026

HY26 / results presentation↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

GMT and GMT Bond Issuer Interim Report 2025

HY25 / financial report↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Full-year context

GMT’s 2025 Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

NZX GMT Result Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

Release context

GMT Annual Meeting - Voting Result

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 18.7pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 42.4%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 10.4% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 2.0%, +0.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when GNZ publishes next

Get the next Goodman Property Trust briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.