Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Heartland Group Holdings (HGH) / HY25

NPAT collapsed 90.4% on one-off charges, dividend halved to 2 cents

Reported NPAT of NZ$3.6m versus underlying NZ$10.7m and a 500% NPAT payout ratio leave the dividend reliant on retained earnings, not current profit.

Financials / Banking and finance

HGH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $172.3m, versus $322.9m in FY25.

HGH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 45.2%, versus 36.8% in HY25.

HGH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $299.5m, versus $673.2m in FY25.

HGH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was -$0.2m, versus $0.4m in FY23.
Release date
27 February 2025
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$155.3m

+9.9% ↑ vs $141.2m

Net profit after tax

$3.6m

-90.4% ↓ vs $37.6m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$236.6m

n/m ↑ vs −$8.8m

Interim dividend per share

2.0c

-50.0% ↓ vs 4.0c

Operating profit

$57.2m

-23.5% ↓ vs $74.7m

Profit before tax

$5.3m

-89.9% ↓ vs $52.6m

Cash and cash equivalents

$377.1m

+31.4% ↑ vs $286.9m

Total assets

$8.8b

+10.4% ↑ vs $7.9b

What changed

Reported NPAT collapsed 90.4% to NZ$3.6m, with PBT down 89.9% to NZ$5.3m, despite net operating income (Heartland's revenue equivalent) rising 9.9% to NZ$155.3m

Management's underlying NPAT was NZ$10.7m, with the gap to reported attributed to one-off regulatory assurance and other items. The PBT margin of 3.4% is an unprecedented low against a four-period historical range of 37.2%-49.6%, and ROE of 0.3% is also unprecedented low against the 6.1%-10.8% historical range.

The interim dividend was cut from 4.0 to 2.0 cents, but the implied NPAT payout ratio still rose to 500% versus a historical 67%-76% range. Total assets grew 10.4% to NZ$8.8b, indicating the lending franchise itself continued to expand even as profitability evaporated.

What matters

Underlying earnings still fell sharply, even before one-offs

Underlying NPAT of NZ$10.7m is roughly 72% below the prior comparable's NZ$37.6m. So while one-off regulatory assurance charges explain most of the headline gap, this is not purely a presentation issue — the core run-rate compressed materially. NOI grew 8.4%, which means cost growth, credit charges or both expanded faster than the income base.

The dividend signal is sharper than the cut itself. Halving the dividend to 2.0 cps is consistent with the 500% NPAT payout ratio versus a historical 67%-76% range — the distribution is now being funded from retained earnings or capital, not from the period's profit. This matters because it tells investors the board sees the earnings reset as durable enough to warrant rebasing capital returns.

The effective tax rate jumped to 32.4% (unprecedented high) from 28.5%. When PBT is only NZ$5.3m, non-deductible items disproportionately inflate the rate, so this is partly a denominator effect rather than a sustained tax change — but it amplified the NPAT hit relative to PBT and should normalise as PBT recovers.

Expectations

No FY25 NPAT target is supplied in the materials

Historical shape data shows HY24 was 48.6% of FY24 revenue and 50.4% of FY24 NPAT, so Heartland has not historically been heavily second-half weighted. Annualising HY25 revenue gives roughly NZ$310.6m, broadly in line with FY24's NZ$290.7m, so the top-line is tracking ahead.

The bottom-line picture is far less supported. Even doubling underlying HY25 NPAT of NZ$10.7m points to a full-year run-rate well below FY24's NZ$74.5m, and the release flags continued macro volatility. Without management quantifying which one-offs will not recur in 2H25, the release does not support a clean profit recovery path for the second half.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is poor on multiple dimensions

The reported NZ$3.6m NPAT is materially distorted by one-off charges, while the underlying NZ$10.7m is itself a sharp step-down from prior periods on a like-for-like basis. The PBT margin of 3.4%, NPAT margin of 2.3% and ROE of 0.3% are all unprecedented lows in the historical baseline supplied.

Operating cash flow swung from negative NZ$8.8m to positive NZ$236.6m, and pre-lease free cash flow of NZ$234.8m is within the historical NZ$-150.9m to NZ$297.2m range. For a balance-sheet lender, however, period operating cash flow is dominated by movements in receivables, deposits and wholesale funding rather than operating earnings, so this swing should not be read as a sign of underlying earnings quality. Capex fell 89.1% to NZ$1.8m (1.2% of revenue), which lowers near-term cash demands but does not address the earnings issue.

The gross borrowings line shows NZ$1.4b versus NZ$6.8b, but the source labels indicate the prior period figure is "Total deposits and other borrowings" while the current is "Other borrowings" only, so the apparent leverage decline is not a clean comparison.

Unresolved

Open questions

What was the dollar quantum of the regulatory assurance one-off, and what specifically does it cover?
Why did underlying NPAT also fall around 72%, and how much of that step-down is credit impairments versus cost growth?
Is the rebased 2.0 cps interim dividend a new policy floor, or a one-period response that could revert if 2H25 underlying earnings recover?
What is management's expected path back to the historical 6.1%-10.8% ROE range, and over what timeframe?
How should investors reconcile the 10.4% total-asset growth with the collapse in profitability — is this a margin issue, a provisioning issue, or both?

This briefing cannot assess the credit quality of Heartland's lending book or the recoverability of the assurance-related charges without underlying provisioning and segment-level disclosure.

Chat

Ask about HGH HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Heartland Group Holdings's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about HGH HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Heartland Group Holdings's HY25 result.

What was the dollar quantum of the regulatory assurance one-off, and what specifically does it cover?Why does "Underlying earnings still fell sharply, even before one-offs" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for HGH after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Heartland 1H2025 - Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

Heartland 1H2025 - Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Heartland 1H2025 - Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

Heartland 1H2025 - Results Announcement Template

HY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Heartland 1H24 - HGH Financial Statements

HY24 / financial report↗

Heartland 1H24 - Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Heartland 1H24 - Results Announcement

HY24 / results release↗

Full-year context

Heartland FY2024 – Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

Heartland FY2024 – Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Heartland FY2024 – Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

Release context

Market update: Increase in Heartland Bank impairment expense

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 500.0%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.5pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 9.9% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 0.3%, -3.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when HGH publishes next

Get the next Heartland Group Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.