Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Hallenstein Glasson (HLG) / HY22

NPAT fell 39.9% as NZ lockdowns overwhelmed a 140bps gross-margin lift

Operating deleverage on a 6.2% revenue decline cut PBT margin to an unprecedented 9.9% and pushed the NPAT payout ratio to 90.1%.

Consumer / Retail apparel

HLG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $275.2m, versus $470.7m in FY25.

HLG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 15%, versus 13% in FY25.

HLG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $53.5m, versus $88.6m in FY25.

HLG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 HLG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $5.9m; 4-period range $-3.4m to $3.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.9m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.4m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.0m.
  • HY23 HLG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $5.9m; 4-period range $-5.4m to $5.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.9m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.6m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY24 HLG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-5.4m; 4-period range $-1.7m to $5.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.4m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.7m.
  • FY24 HLG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-3.4m; 4-period range $-2.6m to $5.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.4m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.4m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.6m.
Release date
25 March 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY22 vs HY21

Revenue

$170.6m

-6.2% ↓ vs $182m

Net profit after tax

$11.9m

-39.9% ↓ vs $19.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$21.2m

-23.9% ↓ vs $27.9m

Interim dividend per share

18.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$16.9m

-39.6% ↓ vs $28m

Total assets

$181.6m

-5.1% ↓ vs $191.5m

What changed

NPAT fell 39.9% to NZ$11.9m and PBT fell 39.6% to NZ$16.9m on a 6.2% revenue decline to NZ$170.6m

Annolyse's historical baseline classifies both PBT growth (4-period mean +27.3%) and NPAT growth (mean +27.2%) as unprecedented lows; PBT margin at 9.9% and NPAT margin at 7.0% are also unprecedented relative to the 12.5%–14.5% PBT-margin range seen across the comparable history window. Gross margin actually expanded 140bps to 57.9%, so the earnings drop reflects operating deleverage on lost revenue rather than price or mix erosion.

Segment splits make the driver explicit: Glassons Australia grew revenue 5.1% to NZ$71.9m with segment result up to NZ$10.7m, while Glassons New Zealand fell 13.6% (result NZ$3.7m, from NZ$5.8m) and Hallenstein Brothers fell 12.4% (result NZ$2.3m, from NZ$3.7m). Operating cash flow dropped 23.9% to NZ$21.2m, and the interim dividend was set at 18 cents per share.

What matters

Earnings broke the historical operating range, not the margin range

  • Gross margin rose 140bps, yet PBT margin landed at 9.9% versus a 13.4% historical mean. That gap is fixed-cost deleverage on the New Zealand and Hallenstein Brothers stores, not a structural margin reset, but it shows how thin the operating buffer is when ~13% of NZ-side revenue is removed. Investors should read this as a demand-side, not a cost-side, problem.

  • The dividend payout is stretched well above the historical band. At 90.1% of NPAT, the payout sits 23.6 points above the 3-period historical mean of 66.5% and above the 61.7%–69.0% range. FCF pre-lease of NZ$18.2m still covers the declared dividend (payout 78.6% of FCF pre-lease), so the dividend is funded, but the NPAT-coverage gap signals the board is holding the dividend flat through the cycle rather than rebasing it.

  • Cash generation weakened to an unprecedented low in absolute terms. Pre-lease FCF of NZ$18.2m sits NZ$16.1m below the NZ$34.3m historical mean and below the prior NZ$27.1m–NZ$40.9m range, even with a NZ$1.7m working-capital release helping the period. Lower earnings, not working-capital absorption, drove the shortfall.

Expectations

No HY22 target was issued; the company states only that the result was in line with guidance flagged on 17 February 2022

Annualising current revenue gives NZ$341.3m, roughly 3% below FY21's NZ$350.8m, but the historical first-half share of FY21 was 51.9% of revenue and 59.6% of NPAT, so the second half is structurally lighter on profit. That shape means an FY22 NPAT comparable to FY21's NZ$33.3m would require the second half to outperform its usual seasonal profile, which the release does not commit to and the lockdown-driven 1H weakness does not obviously set up.

Quality of result

The underlying quality is mixed

The gross-margin lift is genuine and was achieved despite revenue pressure, which supports the read that the business is not discounting through the downturn. Working capital provided a NZ$1.7m release (lower edge of the historical range, where prior periods averaged builds of NZ$4.3m), so cash conversion was modestly assisted but not abnormally so; inventory days at 23.9 sit above the 18.6–23.2 historical band, which is a balance-sheet item to monitor rather than a current cash drag.

The FCF/NPAT conversion of 152.9% looks flattering, but it reflects compressed NPAT as much as cash quality — absolute pre-lease FCF still fell roughly 30% versus the NZ$25.9m prior comparable. ROE at 28.0% remains within the historical range and ahead of the lowest historical reading, indicating the franchise has not structurally impaired even after a heavy earnings hit.

Unresolved

Open questions

What proportion of the NPAT decline is directly attributable to mandated New Zealand store closures versus underlying demand softness, and how should investors size the recovery once lockdowns lifted?
Why was the payout ratio held at 90.1% of NPAT rather than rebased — is this a signal of board confidence in 2H recovery, or simply a willingness to draw on the cushion?
How sustainable is the 140bps gross-margin expansion, and how much of it reflects clearance discipline rather than pricing power?
Can inventory days return inside the historical 18.6–23.2 range without margin sacrifice in the second half?
Will Australia's 5.1% revenue growth and improved segment result hold as a structural mix shift, or was it cycle-flattered by relative reopening timing?

This briefing cannot assess post-period trading momentum, the specific lockdown-day impact on lost sales, or the company's working-capital intent for 2H without further disclosure.

Chat

Ask about HLG HY22

Ask follow-up questions about Hallenstein Glasson's HY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about HLG HY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Hallenstein Glasson's HY22 result.

What proportion of the NPAT decline is directly attributable to mandated New Zealand store closures versus underlying demand softness, and how should investors size the recovery once lockdowns lifted?Why does "Earnings broke the historical operating range, not the margin range" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY22?What should I watch next for HLG after HY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Financial Results for 6 months ended 1 February 2022

HY22 / financial report↗

Group CEO's Report for period ended 1 February 2022

HY22 / results release↗

Results Announcement 1 February 2022

HY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

HLG Interim Report for the 6 months ended 1 February 2021

HY21 / financial report↗

Full-year context

Audited Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Report for the year ended 1 August 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

Results Announcement 1 August 2021

FY21 / results announcement↗

Results Announcement 1 August 2021

FY21 / results release↗

Release context

AGM Results from 21 December 2021

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 28.0%, -18.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 78.6%, with NPAT payout at 90.1%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.3pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -6.2% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when HLG publishes next

Get the next Hallenstein Glasson briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.