Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Hallenstein Glasson (HLG) / HY23

HLG NPAT jumped 74.8% off a weak base, but FCF sat below historical mean

Margins normalised rather than expanded, working capital absorbed NZ$5.9m and capex tripled, leaving free cash flow below the multi-year average.

Consumer / Retail apparel

HLG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $275.2m, versus $470.7m in FY25.

HLG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 15%, versus 13% in FY25.

HLG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $53.5m, versus $88.6m in FY25.

HLG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 HLG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $5.9m; 4-period range $-3.4m to $3.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.9m, unprecedented high; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.4m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.0m.
  • HY23 HLG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $5.9m; 4-period range $-5.4m to $5.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$5.9m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.6m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-3.5m.
  • HY24 HLG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-5.4m; 4-period range $-1.7m to $5.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.4m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.7m.
  • FY24 HLG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-3.4m; 4-period range $-2.6m to $5.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.4m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-3.4m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.5m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.6m.
Release date
31 March 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$223.3m

+30.9% ↑ vs $170.6m

Net profit after tax

$20.8m

+74.8% ↑ vs $11.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$35m

+64.8% ↑ vs $21.2m

Interim dividend per share

24.0c

+33.3% ↑ vs 18.0c

Operating profit

$30.6m

+71.4% ↑ vs $17.8m

Profit before tax

$29.5m

+74.6% ↑ vs $16.9m

Total assets

$201.8m

+11.1% ↑ vs $181.6m

What changed

Revenue rose 30.9% to NZ$223.3m, profit before tax climbed 74.6% to NZ$29.5m and net profit after tax rose 74.8% to NZ$20.8m

Each of those growth rates is unprecedented against Annolyse's historical baseline (revenue mean 4.0%, PBT mean -1.3%, NPAT mean -1.5%), but the prior comparable was unusually soft: HY22 revenue fell 6.2% and NPAT fell 40.0% on COVID-related disruption.

Operating cash flow rose 64.8% to NZ$35.0m, and the interim dividend lifted to 24.0 cents per share from 18.0 cents. Two offsets sit beneath the headlines: gross margin contracted 140 bps to 56.5%, and capex rose 159.5% to NZ$7.9m (3.5% of revenue versus 1.8% a year earlier). Pre-lease free cash flow at NZ$27.1m is up NZ$8.9m year-on-year but sits at the lower edge of the historical range (mean NZ$32.1m).

What matters

The rebound restored normal profitability rather than lifting it

  • PBT margin of 13.2% and NPAT margin of 9.3% are both within the supplied historical range (means 12.6% and 8.9%), and gross margin actually fell 140 bps. The unprecedented growth rates therefore reflect a weak HY22 base rather than a structural step-up in earnings power, which matters because the read-through to FY23 is closer to a return to trend than a new earnings level.
  • Working capital absorbed NZ$5.9m versus a historical mean of NZ$0.6m. Inventory grew 27.3% to NZ$28.5m, pushing inventory days to 23.2 — the upper edge of the historical range. With revenue growing 30.9% the inventory build is broadly proportionate, but the absolute cash absorption is above normal and is the main reason cash generation lagged earnings.
  • Capex tripled while FCF stayed below its historical average. Capex of NZ$7.9m is up 159.5% and lifted capital intensity from 1.8% to 3.5% of revenue. With no commentary on what is being funded, the step-up is unexplained and matters for the durability of the elevated dividend (24 cps; payout 68.8% of NPAT).

Expectations

No forward targets are provided

The supplied second-half shape shows HY22 contributed only 48.6% of FY22 revenue and 46.5% of FY22 NPAT, indicating the business is typically second-half weighted; however, that pattern is distorted because HY22 was itself COVID-affected. Annualising current first-half revenue gives roughly NZ$446.6m, but applying the historical first-half share to this result would imply something higher, and neither anchor is reliable given the comparable's quality.

The release commentary describes the result as in line with prior guidance given in February. Beyond that, the release does not support a specific FY23 trajectory, so the second-half outcome remains the principal open variable.

Quality of result

The headline earnings look clean at the statutory line: the effective tax rate of 29.4% matches the four-period mean of 29.4%, no non-recurring items are flagged, and there is no discontinued-operation or one-off distortion separating PBT growth (74.6%) from NPAT growth (74.8%)

On that basis the profit lift is real and durable in composition.

Cash quality is weaker than earnings quality. FCF-to-NPAT fell from 152.9% to 130.3%, and pre-lease FCF of NZ$27.1m is NZ$5.0m below the historical mean despite earnings being at a record. The drivers are identifiable rather than mysterious — a NZ$5.9m working-capital build (above normal range) and a NZ$4.8m year-on-year capex increase — but together they mean reported earnings overstate this period's cash generation relative to history. ROE of 22.3% (versus 13.7% prior) confirms the operating rebound, yet sits below the three-period mean of 26.8%.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did gross margin contract 140 bps to 56.5% despite a 30.9% revenue lift, and is the compression a pricing, mix or cost-of-goods issue?
What is the NZ$7.9m capex (up 159.5%) being spent on, and is the elevated capital intensity expected to persist?
Is the NZ$28.5m inventory position (up 27.3%) sized for continued growth, or does it carry markdown risk into the second half?
How sustainable is Glassons Australia's 43.1% revenue lift to NZ$102.9m, which drove most of the group's incremental profit?
Will management hold the 24-cent interim dividend trajectory if pre-lease FCF remains below the historical mean?

This briefing cannot assess management's internal expectations for the second half or the medium-term capital plan, because neither forward targets nor capex guidance are disclosed in the release.

Chat

Ask about HLG HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Hallenstein Glasson's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about HLG HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Hallenstein Glasson's HY23 result.

Why did gross margin contract 140 bps to 56.5% despite a 30.9% revenue lift, and is the compression a pricing, mix or cost-of-goods issue?Why does "The rebound restored normal profitability rather than lifting it" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for HLG after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Financial Results for 6 months ended 1 February 2023

HY23 / financial report↗

Group CEO's Report for period ended 1 February 2023

HY23 / results release↗

Results Announcement 1 February 2023

HY23 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Financial Results for 6 months ended 1 February 2022

HY22 / financial report↗

Results Announcement 1 February 2022

HY22 / results announcement↗

Results Announcement 1 February 2022

HY22 / results release↗

Full-year context

Audited Financial Statements and Independent Auditors Report for the year ended 1 August 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Results Announcement 1 August 2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Results Announcement 1 August 2022

FY22 / results release↗

Release context

AGM Results from 15 December 2022

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 30.9% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 68.8%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.2pp.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 22.3%, +8.6pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when HLG publishes next

Get the next Hallenstein Glasson briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.