Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Infratil (IFT) / HY23

Pre-lease FCF hit unprecedented -NZ$286.5m as cash conversion collapsed

PBT rose 53.2% and the margin was a record, but operating cash outflow widened to -NZ$234.6m and the lifted dividend is uncovered by cash.

Transport & Infrastructure / Infrastructure investment

IFT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.5b, versus $3.3b in FY25.

IFT Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 45.1%, versus 11.9% in FY25.

IFT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $32.7m, versus $386.4m in FY25.

IFT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY25 IFT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-56.9m; 3-period range $-2.4m to $47.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-56.9m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$23.9m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY26 IFT: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $47.3m; 3-period range $-56.9m to $0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$47.3m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-29.6m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$47.3m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.5m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-29.6m.
Release date
15 November 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$604.4m

+11.7% ↑ vs $541.1m

Net profit after tax

$350.5m

-67.6% ↓ vs $1.1b

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$234.6m

n/m ↓ vs −$17.4m

Interim dividend per share

6.8c

+3.8% ↑ vs 6.5c

Operating profit

$325.5m

+63.8% ↑ vs $198.7m

Profit before tax

$297.9m

+53.2% ↑ vs $194.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$522.5m

-57.0% ↓ vs $1.2b

Total assets

$10.2b

+10.9% ↑ vs $9.2b

What changed

Cash quality is the headline

Pre-lease free cash flow was -NZ$286.5m, classified as an unprecedented low against Annolyse's historical baseline (4-period mean -NZ$96.5m; range -NZ$217.5m to NZ$1.3m). Operating cash outflow widened more than thirteen-fold to -NZ$234.6m from -NZ$17.4m, and capex rose 37.7% to NZ$51.9m (8.6% of revenue).

Headline earnings sent a mixed signal. Revenue grew 11.7% to NZ$604.4m, but that growth sits at the lower edge of the company's historical range (4-period mean 45.1%). PBT rose 53.2% to NZ$297.9m and PBT margin of 49.3% is an unprecedented high (4-period mean 8.7%). NPAT fell 67.6% to NZ$350.5m because the prior period included a NZ$993.9m discontinued-operations gain on the Tilt sale; the current period booked a NZ$336.5m discontinued-operations contribution.

Gross borrowings expanded to NZ$3.3b from NZ$789.5m, and the group moved from a NZ$424.3m net cash position to NZ$2.7b of net debt. The interim dividend was lifted to 6.75c from 6.5c.

What matters

Cash generation deteriorated to a record low

Pre-lease FCF of -NZ$286.5m is roughly NZ$190.0m below the historical mean and was driven by the operating-cash swing, not capex alone. Working-capital movement of NZ$0.5m sits within Annolyse's historical range, so the deterioration is not a one-off receivable build — it reflects the underlying operating cash profile. This matters because reported PBT and segment results suggest a strong half, while the cash account does not corroborate it.

PBT growth is the cleaner operating read; NPAT is distorted on both ends. The current effective tax rate of 0.0% (versus 29.9% prior) flatters the PBT-to-NPAT translation, and the prior period's Tilt gain mechanically inverts the comparison. PBT growth of 53.2% — with PBT margin at a record 49.3% — is the cleaner measure, though it leans heavily on associates (NZ$346.6m vs NZ$114.1m) and the Manawa Energy segment result (NZ$390.8m vs NZ$115.1m).

The lifted dividend is not covered by cash. Payout versus NPAT rose to 13.9% — above the company's historical range (3-period mean 7.0%) — and payout versus pre-lease FCF is -17.1%, meaning the distribution is being funded from the balance sheet rather than current cash generation. ROE also fell to 6.1% from 22.3% as the prior period's disposal gain rolled off.

Expectations

No forward targets were supplied with this release, and the FY22 shape is not a clean guide because both comparable periods are flagged for discontinued operations

The reference HY22 contributed 63% of FY22 revenue and 92.4% of FY22 NPAT — but the NPAT share is distorted by the Tilt gain landing in the first half. The release supports a directional read that continuing-operations profitability has stepped up materially, but it does not support a confident full-year shape on either earnings or cash. The gap matters because the second-half cash trajectory is what determines whether the lifted dividend is sustainable from operations.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is uneven

The PBT step-up and unprecedented PBT margin look durable on the income statement, but they are concentrated in associate income and the Manawa Energy segment result rather than in operating cash flow. The 0.0% effective tax rate is a meaningful presentational tailwind to NPAT optics that will not repeat at that level, and the current-period NZ$336.5m discontinued-operations contribution is not part of the recurring earnings base.

On the cash side, the unprecedented-low pre-lease FCF, the widening of operating cash outflow despite a normal-range working-capital movement, and the swing from net cash to NZ$2.7b of net debt all point to a result that is not yet self-funding. The acquisition flagged in this period (Gurīn Energy contributed -NZ$7.1m at the segment line) adds growth investment but does not yet contribute cash.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the 0.0% effective tax rate, and how should investors think about a normalised rate from here?
What specifically generated the NZ$336.5m discontinued-operations result in the current period?
How much of the NZ$390.8m Manawa Energy segment result and the NZ$346.6m associates line is fair-value or disposal-related versus recurring?
How will management fund a dividend that is uncovered by pre-lease FCF if the cash-generation profile persists into the second half?
What is the expected cash-flow profile of Gurīn Energy and other in-period acquisitions?

This briefing cannot assess management's specific commentary on tax, discontinued-operations composition, or second-half guidance, because the supplied release excerpts do not address those drivers in detail.

Chat

Ask about IFT HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Infratil's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about IFT HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Infratil's HY23 result.

What drove the 0.0% effective tax rate, and how should investors think about a normalised rate from here?Why does "Cash generation deteriorated to a record low" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for IFT after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

company filing

HY23 / results announcement↗

company filing

HY23 / results release↗

Infratil FY2023 Interim Results Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

Infratil Group FY2023 Interim Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Infratil Group FY2022 Interim Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

NZX Results Announcement (Rule 3.5)

HY22 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement (Rule 3.5)

HY22 / results release↗

Full-year context

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

company filing

FY22 / results release↗

Infratil FY2022 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

Release context

Infratil 2022 Annual Meeting Presentation

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 120.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 6.1%, -16.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 13.9%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 11.7% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when IFT publishes next

Get the next Infratil briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.