Net profit after tax
$142.7m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
NTA per share hit a fresh high of $1.77, but recurring investment income fell 10.9% and covered only 25.4% of distributions paid.
Net tangible asset or net asset value per share, shown in per-share cents for chart readability.
Recurring investment-income or revenue-return proxy, excluding fair-value movement where disclosed.
Total income or return including fair-value or capital movement where disclosed.
Net asset base attributable to shareholders or unitholders.
Key metrics
FY21 vs FY20
Net profit after tax
$142.7m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Net cash inflow from operating activities
−$48.3m
-42.8% ↓ vs −$33.8m
Full-year dividend per share
13.5c
+6.7% ↑ vs 12.6c
Investment income
$156m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Operating profit
$142.7m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Profit before tax
$142.7m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Cash and cash equivalents
$33.5m
+81.3% ↑ vs $18.5m
Total assets
$560.4m
+62.0% ↑ vs $345.8m
What changed
Both figures sit well outside Annolyse's historical baseline (portfolio mean 0.7%; benchmark mean 1.6%). NTA per share reached $1.77, an unprecedented high against the historical mean of $1.38 across the recent four-period window. Net assets attributable to shareholders rose to NZ$551.4m from NZ$345.4m (+59.7%), reflecting gains on investments of NZ$150.5m disclosed in the commentary alongside warrant exercises during the year. Reported NPAT of NZ$142.7m compared with NZ$1.7m in the COVID-affected FY20 base; the year-on-year growth percentage is dominated by mark-to-market movement and is not surfaced as a clean growth figure. The full-year dividend declared was 13.48 cps (FY20: 12.63 cps), with a 3.6 cps final component.
What matters
A 12.9pp lead over the index is large in absolute terms and unprecedented in the supplied historical baseline. The commentary attributes the result to "the recovery of key portfolio stocks", which means investors should test how much of the spread came from concentrated recovery positions versus repeatable security selection in a market-wide rebound.
NTA at $1.77 reflects portfolio revaluation, not income generation. Net assets grew NZ$206m, but investment income excluding fair-value movements fell to NZ$5.5m from NZ$6.1m (-10.9%). This matters because distribution coverage from underlying yield was only 25.4% (FY20: 33.1%) on the company's disclosed basis.
Distributions are funded from capital returns, not recurring income. The company paid NZ$21.5m in distributions against NZ$5.5m of recurring investment income. That is sustainable while portfolio returns stay positive but introduces structural sensitivity to drawdowns. ROE of 25.9% (FY20: 0.5%) sits well above the historical mean of 0.4%, but that baseline includes loss-making periods and is dominated by mark-to-market movement in this year.
Expectations
Against Annolyse's historical baseline, both portfolio total return and the benchmark return are unprecedented, so the reference point for next year is mean-reversion rather than a managed target. The HY21 share of full-year NPAT was 60.9% and of full-year investment income 61.3%, indicating a front-loaded recovery half within FY21. Because the FY20 base captured the March COVID drawdown, the half-shape is a function of timing rather than operating cadence. Forward dividend rate and any change to distribution policy following the higher net-asset base remain to be tested in subsequent periods.
Quality of result
Gains on investments of NZ$150.5m dominate the NZ$156.0m total income line, while recurring investment income (dividend plus interest) fell 10.9% to NZ$5.5m. ROE of 25.9% and the lift in net assets to NZ$551.4m therefore reflect mark-to-market revaluation across the equity book rather than realised yield.
For this reporting shape, the relevant durability test is the 12.9pp spread over benchmark and the persistence of NTA gains, not cash conversion or working-capital movement. Net cash outflow from operating activities of NZ$48.3m (FY20: NZ$33.8m outflow) reflects net portfolio purchases and capital deployment rather than an earnings-quality signal. Distribution coverage from recurring income narrowed to 25.4% on the disclosed basis, which means a sustained portfolio drawdown would force distributions to be funded from realised gains or capital. That is consistent with an NTA-plus-distribution return policy but is a structural feature investors should price explicitly.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess portfolio concentration, individual security weightings, or any forward management views not included in the supplied release commentary.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Kingfish's FY21 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
KFL - Commentary for the year ended 31 March 2021
FY21 / results releaseKFL - Financial Statements for year ended 31 March 2021 incl audit report
FY21 / financial reportKFL - Preliminary year end announcement - 31 March 2021
FY21 / results announcementKingfish Limited 2020 Annual Report
FY20 / financial reportKFL - Financial Statements for period 30 Sep 20 incl review report
HY21 / financial reportKFL - Preliminary half year announcement
HY21 / results releaseRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Get the next Kingfish briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.