Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Kingfish (KFL) / FY21

Result released27 May 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

Portfolio returned 41.1%, beating benchmark by 12.9 points

NTA per share hit a fresh high of $1.77, but recurring investment income fell 10.9% and covered only 25.4% of distributions paid.

Investment Companies / Listed investment company

KFL metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 20 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$437.9m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

8.8%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Premium / discount

0.6%

i

For investment companies, price compared with reported NTA.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.04

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not useful for this reporting shape.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

Release date
27 May 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY21 vs FY20

Net profit after tax

$142.7m

n/m ↑ vs $1.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$48.3m

-42.8% ↓ vs −$33.8m

Full-year dividend per share

13.5c

+6.7% ↑ vs 12.6c

Investment income

$156m

n/m ↑ vs $6.1m

Operating profit

$142.7m

n/m ↑ vs $1.8m

Profit before tax

$142.7m

n/m ↑ vs $1.8m

Cash and cash equivalents

$33.5m

+81.3% ↑ vs $18.5m

Total assets

$560.4m

+62.0% ↑ vs $345.8m

Analysis ofKFL FY21·Result released27 May 2021·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Kingfish delivered a 41.1% portfolio total return in FY21, ahead of the benchmark's 28.2% by 12.9 percentage points

Both figures sit well outside Annolyse's historical baseline (portfolio mean 0.7%; benchmark mean 1.6%). NTA per share reached $1.77, an unprecedented high against the historical mean of $1.38 across the recent four-period window. Net assets attributable to shareholders rose to NZ$551.4m from NZ$345.4m (+59.7%), reflecting gains on investments of NZ$150.5m disclosed in the commentary alongside warrant exercises during the year. Reported NPAT of NZ$142.7m compared with NZ$1.7m in the COVID-affected FY20 base; the year-on-year growth percentage is dominated by mark-to-market movement and is not surfaced as a clean growth figure. The full-year dividend declared was 13.48 cps (FY20: 12.63 cps), with a 3.6 cps final component.

What matters

Benchmark outperformance is the central durability question

  • A 12.9pp lead over the index is large in absolute terms and unprecedented in the supplied historical baseline. The commentary attributes the result to "the recovery of key portfolio stocks", which means investors should test how much of the spread came from concentrated recovery positions versus repeatable security selection in a market-wide rebound.

  • NTA at $1.77 reflects portfolio revaluation, not income generation. Net assets grew NZ$206m, but investment income excluding fair-value movements fell to NZ$5.5m from NZ$6.1m (-10.9%). This matters because distribution coverage from underlying yield was only 25.4% (FY20: 33.1%) on the company's disclosed basis.

  • Distributions are funded from capital returns, not recurring income. The company paid NZ$21.5m in distributions against NZ$5.5m of recurring investment income. That is sustainable while portfolio returns stay positive but introduces structural sensitivity to drawdowns. ROE of 25.9% (FY20: 0.5%) sits well above the historical mean of 0.4%, but that baseline includes loss-making periods and is dominated by mark-to-market movement in this year.

Expectations

No stated forward targets, expense-ratio commentary, or benchmark-relative guidance are supplied for FY22 in this release

Against Annolyse's historical baseline, both portfolio total return and the benchmark return are unprecedented, so the reference point for next year is mean-reversion rather than a managed target. The HY21 share of full-year NPAT was 60.9% and of full-year investment income 61.3%, indicating a front-loaded recovery half within FY21. Because the FY20 base captured the March COVID drawdown, the half-shape is a function of timing rather than operating cadence. Forward dividend rate and any change to distribution policy following the higher net-asset base remain to be tested in subsequent periods.

Quality of result

The headline NPAT is portfolio-return driven, not income-driven

Gains on investments of NZ$150.5m dominate the NZ$156.0m total income line, while recurring investment income (dividend plus interest) fell 10.9% to NZ$5.5m. ROE of 25.9% and the lift in net assets to NZ$551.4m therefore reflect mark-to-market revaluation across the equity book rather than realised yield.

For this reporting shape, the relevant durability test is the 12.9pp spread over benchmark and the persistence of NTA gains, not cash conversion or working-capital movement. Net cash outflow from operating activities of NZ$48.3m (FY20: NZ$33.8m outflow) reflects net portfolio purchases and capital deployment rather than an earnings-quality signal. Distribution coverage from recurring income narrowed to 25.4% on the disclosed basis, which means a sustained portfolio drawdown would force distributions to be funded from realised gains or capital. That is consistent with an NTA-plus-distribution return policy but is a structural feature investors should price explicitly.

Unresolved

Open questions

What proportion of the 12.9pp benchmark outperformance came from a small number of concentrated holdings, and what is the current largest position weight?
Why did recurring investment income fall 10.9% while net assets grew 59.7%, and is portfolio yield expected to recover in FY22?
How does management view distribution sustainability given coverage of only 25.4% from recurring income?
What is the expected expense ratio now that net assets are NZ$192.9m above the historical mean?
Will distribution policy continue to be set against NAV irrespective of recurring income coverage?

This briefing cannot assess portfolio concentration, individual security weightings, or any forward management views not included in the supplied release commentary.

Chat

Ask about KFL FY21

Ask follow-up questions about Kingfish's FY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about KFL FY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Kingfish's FY21 result.

What proportion of the 12.9pp benchmark outperformance came from a small number of concentrated holdings, and what is the current largest position weight?Why does "Benchmark outperformance is the central durability question" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY21?What should I watch next for KFL after FY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

KFL - Commentary for the year ended 31 March 2021

FY21 / results release↗

KFL - Financial Statements for year ended 31 March 2021 incl audit report

FY21 / financial report↗

KFL - Preliminary year end announcement - 31 March 2021

FY21 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Kingfish Limited 2020 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

Interim context

KFL - Financial Statements for period 30 Sep 20 incl review report

HY21 / financial report↗

KFL - Preliminary half year announcement

HY21 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 466.3pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was n/m for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 25.9%, +25.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 23.9%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when KFL publishes next

Get the next Kingfish briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.