Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Kiwi Property Group (KPG) / FY22

PBT up 17.2% but operating profit up just 7.3% as valuation gains dominate

Statutory earnings are inflated by non-cash investment property revaluations while debtor days rose materially above the historical range.

Property / Property investment

KPG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $271.4m, versus $136.7m in HY26.

KPG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 46%, versus 43.9% in HY25.

KPG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $81.8m, versus $47.9m in HY26.

KPG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-5m; 5-period range $0m to $82.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.0m, below normal range; 4/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$30.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.4m; 4-period range $4.2m to $72m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.4m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$25.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $72m; 4-period range $-2.4m to $17.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$72.0m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$9.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY25 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $82.4m; 5-period range $-5m to $17.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Release date
23 May 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$246.8m

+6.2% ↑ vs $232.4m

Net profit after tax

$224.3m

+14.1% ↑ vs $196.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$115.6m

+7.8% ↑ vs $107.2m

Full-year dividend per share

5.6c

+8.7% ↑ vs 5.2c

Profit before tax

$260.6m

+17.2% ↑ vs $222.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$11.6m

-27.7% ↓ vs $16m

Total assets

$3.6b

+6.8% ↑ vs $3.4b

What changed

Statutory PBT rose 17.2% to $260.6m, but underlying operating profit grew just 7.3% to $124.8m on revenue up 6.2% to $246.8m

The gap — about $135.8m — sits outside the operating result and reflects non-cash valuation gains on the investment property portfolio. A PBT margin of 105.6% and NPAT margin of 90.9% both sit above Annolyse's historical baseline for KPG, where the three-period mean margins are deeply negative, confirming the headline is being lifted by revaluation rather than rental performance alone.

NPAT rose 14.1% to $224.3m, operating cash flow rose 7.8% to $115.6m, and NTA per share moved to $1.45 from $1.36. Trade debtors jumped 56.3% to $11.8m, taking debtor days to 17.5 from a historical range of 12.1–13.5. Gross borrowings rose 8.2% to $1.1b.

What matters

Statutory earnings depend heavily on portfolio revaluation

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$100m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$150m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$193.7m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

Operating profit grew 7.3% on revenue up 6.2%, so the cash-earnings engine is expanding mid-single digits, while around $135.8m of non-cash items lifts PBT to $260.6m. For a property issuer, this matters because the durable cash dividend is anchored to rental operating profit; investors should not extrapolate 17.2% PBT growth as a forward run-rate.

Debtor days have stepped up materially. At 17.5 days, debtor days are above the historical baseline (mean 13.0, range 12.1–13.5), with trade debtors up 56.3% to $11.8m on revenue up only 6.2%. This matters because elevated receivables can foreshadow tenant payment stress or larger uncollected billings, both of which would weigh on subsequent cash conversion.

ROE strengthened but is revaluation-assisted. ROE of 9.9% sits above the historical baseline (three-period mean -2.9%, range -11.8% to 3.1%), driven by the same fair-value gains lifting NPAT. The underlying return from rental operations is more modest given operating profit of $124.8m on total assets of $3.6b. The apparent ROE step-up may not persist if cap rates reverse.

Expectations

Management has guided to an FY23 cash dividend of 5.7cps, modestly above the FY22 full-year dividend of 5.6cps (versus 5.15cps in FY21)

HY22 NPAT carried 63.9% of the full-year result while operating cash flow split closer to evenly (48.6% in HY22), so the second-half NPAT compression reflects a smaller revaluation contribution rather than weaker cash earnings. The 5.7cps target is a small step-up that looks well within reach if rental income stays on its current track and does not require further fair-value gains.

What the release does not support is a view on tenant demand into the next cycle. Without extractable WALT, occupancy, or rent reversion disclosure in the supplied data, the durability read for FY23 depends on commentary investors will need to confirm directly.

Quality of result

Underlying cash-generating quality is acceptable but more modest than the headline implies

Operating cash flow of $115.6m closely tracks operating profit of $124.8m, and pre-lease free cash flow of $34.2m (versus $4.0m prior) sits above the historical baseline (mean -$48.0m). The swing is largely driven by a 21.1% drop in capex to $81.4m rather than stronger operations: capex intensity fell to 33.0% of revenue from 44.4%, which mechanically supports near-term cash but defers the development pipeline underwriting future rental growth.

The operating working-capital movement of $4.2m sits at the lower edge of the historical range (mean $29.0m), and with debtor days at 17.5 above the baseline, the cash result has absorbed receivables pressure rather than been flattered by a one-off release. Net debt rose to $1.1b from $1b as gross borrowings grew faster than equity, with leverage direction weakening; the effective tax rate of 14.0% (versus 11.6% prior, both at the lower edge of the historical baseline) provides no help to NPAT comparability.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the FY22 fair-value revaluation reflects compressed cap rates that may reverse in FY23?
Why did trade debtors grow 56.3% on revenue up just 6.2%, and which tenant categories or segments drove the build?
How does management reconcile the 5.7cps FY23 dividend target with the disclosed 88% AFFO payout ratio, and what is the buffer if rent collection softens?
What is current portfolio occupancy and WALT, and how do rent reversions on FY23 expiries compare to passing rents?
Will the development capex profile rebuild from the reduced FY22 level, and how will it be funded given net debt has already risen?

This briefing cannot assess KPG's occupancy, WALT, rent-reversion trajectory, or the cap-rate sensitivity of the investment property valuation, because the supplied data does not include those disclosures.

Chat

Ask about KPG FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about KPG FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY22 result.

What share of the FY22 fair-value revaluation reflects compressed cap rates that may reverse in FY23?Why does "Statutory earnings depend heavily on portfolio revaluation" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for KPG after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Kiwi Property Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Annual Results Presentation 2022

FY22 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement 2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Kiwi Property Annual Report FY21

FY21 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Annual Results Presentation FY21

FY21 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property NZX Announcement FY21

FY21 / results release↗

Interim context

KPG Interim report 1H22

HY22 / financial report↗

KPG Interim results announcement 1H22

HY22 / results announcement↗

KPG Interim results NZX release 1H22

HY22 / results release↗

KPG Interim results presentation 1H22

HY22 / results presentation↗

Release context

Annual meeting and closing date for director nominations

FY21 / commentary↗

Kiwi Property increases FY22 dividend guidance

FY22 / commentary↗

KPG annual meeting and closing date for director nominations

FY22 / commentary↗

Results of Kiwi Property Annual Meeting 2021

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 3.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 88.0% on an AFFO basis, with NPAT payout at 39.2%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 6.2% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 9.9%, +0.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when KPG publishes next

Get the next Kiwi Property Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.