Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Kiwi Property Group (KPG) / FY26

PBT fell 17.0% while FCF swung to NZ$25.5m on a 45% capex cut

Reported earnings declined and the 5.6cps full-year dividend ran at 182.4% of NPAT, with lower capex rather than profit growth funding deleveraging.

Property / Property investment

KPG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $271.4m, versus $136.7m in HY26.

KPG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 46%, versus 43.9% in HY25.

KPG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $81.8m, versus $47.9m in HY26.

KPG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-5m; 5-period range $0m to $82.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.0m, below normal range; 4/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$30.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.4m; 4-period range $4.2m to $72m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.4m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$25.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $72m; 4-period range $-2.4m to $17.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$72.0m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$9.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY25 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $82.4m; 5-period range $-5m to $17.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Release date
18 May 2026
Published
18 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$271.4m

+2.9% ↑ vs $263.7m

Net profit after tax

$50.4m

-11.6% ↓ vs $57m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$81.8m

+1.7% ↑ vs $80.5m

Full-year dividend per share

5.6c

+3.7% ↑ vs 5.4c

Profit before tax

$78.4m

-17.0% ↓ vs $94.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$10.4m

-27.7% ↓ vs $14.4m

Total assets

$3.2b

-2.7% ↓ vs $3.3b

What changed

Revenue grew 2.9% to NZ$271.4m, within Annolyse's historical baseline (4-period mean 3.8%), but the operating profit line did not flow through

PBT fell 17.0% to NZ$78.4m and NPAT fell 11.6% to NZ$50.4m, even though the effective tax rate eased from 39.7% to 35.7%. The cleaner read on operating performance is PBT, and it weakened.

Operating cash flow was effectively flat at NZ$81.8m (+1.7%). Pre-lease free cash flow swung from –NZ$22.0m to NZ$25.5m, which the supplied historical pattern puts at the upper edge of the company's recent range (4-period mean –NZ$27.5m). The driver was a 45% step-down in capex on investment properties to NZ$56.4m, not earnings growth.

Gross borrowings fell to NZ$1.2b, gearing reduced 100bps to 37.4%, and the weighted average interest rate dropped from 5.30% to 4.81%. NTA per share eased from NZ$1.14 to NZ$1.12.

What matters

Earnings declined while cash improved, and the gap is mechanical

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$1b capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

Plaza sale adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$118.9m disclosed value, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

PBT fell 17.0% on revenue up 2.9%, so something in the cost, fair-value, or financing stack absorbed the rent uplift. At the same time, the headline FCF improvement is almost entirely a capex story — capex/revenue dropped from 38.9% to 20.8%. The cash quality therefore looks better than the earnings quality, but only because spend was deferred.

Dividend coverage versus statutory earnings has widened. The full-year dividend of 5.6cps (vs 5.4cps) sits at 182.4% of NPAT, up from 151.3% the year prior. Guidance of 5.75cps for FY27 implies a further step in cash distribution against an earnings base that just shrank. This matters because the deleveraging narrative depends on internal cash retention and disposal proceeds, not on dividends moving in line with profitability.

Segment mix shifted materially. The Office segment fell from 24.6% to 17.8% of revenue, while Retail-led mixed-use rose to 65.1% and a re-grouped "Other" line jumped from 0.3% to 15.5%. Reported leasing spreads (office +13.4%, retail-led mixed-use +6.6%) suggest rent growth is intact within categories, so the headline revenue rate understates underlying leasing momentum once the portfolio composition change is stripped out.

Expectations

ASB North Wharf sale changes the revenue-base context, with NZ$205m disclosed value, but reported revenue still needs source-backed operating support

No quantitative FY27 financial targets were supplied beyond the 5.75cps dividend guidance. The half-year shape was unusually second-half-weighted: HY26 carried 50.3% of full-year revenue but only 19.5% of full-year NPAT, so the H2 NPAT print of roughly NZ$40.6m carried the year. That skew means the next interim is unlikely to look like a clean run-rate.

Forward revenue continuity is a real question because the portfolio has been reshaped through disposals during and after the period, and a further large disposal is set to settle in FY27. The release does not quantify the rental income lost, so the FY27 starting base for like-for-like revenue cannot be triangulated from the supplied materials.

Quality of result

The FCF inflection is timing-driven rather than earnings-driven

Pre-lease FCF at NZ$25.5m sits at the upper edge of Annolyse's historical baseline (range –NZ$72.7m to NZ$34.2m), but it is anchored on capex falling NZ$46m, not on operating cash conversion improving. Operating cash flow itself rose only 1.7%. If capex normalises toward the historical pattern, the FCF print does not repeat at this level.

Working-capital and receivables signals are constructive but secondary. Operating working-capital build of NZ$7.8m is within the historical range (4-period mean NZ$22.8m), and debtor days at 11.1 sit below the historical baseline of 14.1 days, which is favourable but small in dollar terms. Inventory days rose to 132.5 from 123.4, reflecting development-land holdings. The interest rate reduction to 4.81% is a durable benefit to FY27 net interest if held, but the disposal-supported gearing improvement is non-repeating once the asset base finishes resetting.

Unresolved

Open questions

What absorbed the 17.0% PBT decline given revenue grew 2.9% and the weighted average interest rate fell — was it fair-value movement, one-off costs, or underlying cost growth?
How is the 5.75cps FY27 dividend supported given the current 5.6cps already runs at 182.4% of NPAT and pre-lease FCF is capex-suppressed?
What is the expected FY27 capex envelope, and does the 20.8% capex/revenue ratio represent the new run rate or a deferral?
How much rental income leaves the portfolio at FY27 settlement of the announced disposals, and what backfills it?
Will the segment re-grouping into "Other" persist on this basis, and what is the underlying like-for-like Office revenue trend stripping the disposed asset out?

This briefing cannot assess fair-value movements on investment properties or the specific line-by-line bridge between PBT and the prior comparable.

Chat

Ask about KPG FY26

Ask follow-up questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about KPG FY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Kiwi Property Group's FY26 result.

What absorbed the 17.0% PBT decline given revenue grew 2.9% and the weighted average interest rate fell — was it fair-value movement, one-off costs, or underlying cost growth?Why does "Earnings declined while cash improved, and the gap is mechanical" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY26?What should I watch next for KPG after FY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Kiwi Property Annual Report 2026

FY26 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Annual Results Presentation 2026

FY26 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement Notice 2026

FY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Kiwi Property Annual Report 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Annual Results Presentation 2025

FY25 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property Results Announcement Notice 2025

FY25 / results announcement↗

Interim context

Kiwi Property Interim Report 1H26

HY26 / financial report↗

Kiwi Property Interim Results presentation 1H26

HY26 / results presentation↗

Kiwi Property NZX results announcement notice 1H26

HY26 / results announcement↗

Release context

Annual meeting date and closing date for director nominations

FY25 / commentary↗

Annual meeting date, closing date for director nominations

FY26 / commentary↗

Sale of ASB North Wharf unconditional

FY26 / commentary↗

Kiwi Property’s credit rating outlook revised to stable

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 5.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 92.0% on a company-disclosed basis, with NPAT payout at 182.4%.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 132 days, +9 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 2.9% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when KPG publishes next

Get the next Kiwi Property Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.