Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Kiwi Property Group (KPG) / HY21

Debtor days hit 36 days — nearly triple the historical norm of 13.7 days

Trade receivables tripled to NZ$22.2m against a revenue decline, signalling rent-collection stress that the headline PBT recovery does not resolve.

Property / Property investment

KPG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $271.4m, versus $136.7m in HY26.

KPG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 46%, versus 43.9% in HY25.

KPG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $81.8m, versus $47.9m in HY26.

KPG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-5m; 5-period range $0m to $82.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-5.0m, below normal range; 4/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$30.2m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 KPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-2.4m; 4-period range $4.2m to $72m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-2.4m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$25.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $72m; 4-period range $-2.4m to $17.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$72.0m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$9.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-2.4m.
  • HY25 KPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $82.4m; 5-period range $-5m to $17.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$82.4m, unprecedented high; 3/5 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$12.7m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-5.0m.
Release date
23 November 2020
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY21 vs HY20

Revenue

$112.2m

-5.1% ↓ vs $118.3m

Net profit after tax

$54.2m

+47.3% ↑ vs $36.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$56.7m

+14.7% ↑ vs $49.5m

Interim dividend per share

2.2c

-37.6% ↓ vs 3.5c

Profit before tax

$64.2m

+35.7% ↑ vs $47.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$13.5m

+21.2% ↑ vs $11.1m

Total assets

$3.3b

-3.1% ↓ vs $3.4b

What changed

Trade receivables tripled year-on-year to NZ$22.2m, pushing debtor days to 36.0 days — an unprecedented high against Annolyse's historical baseline mean of 13.7 days and a prior-period range of 10.9 to 19.2 days

This collection deterioration sits behind a headline result that otherwise looks constructive: PBT rose 35.7% to NZ$64.2m on revenue that fell 5.1% to NZ$112.2m, and operating cash flow improved 14.7% to NZ$56.7m. Management attributed the operating profit decline — which it reported as down 8.4% to NZ$55.2m on a pre-tax basis — to lockdown impacts in the period.

Gross borrowings fell NZ$67.3m to NZ$1b, reducing net debt to approximately NZ$1b, and capex moderated to NZ$77.3m from NZ$84.0m. The interim dividend was set at 2.2 cents per share, against 3.525 cents in the prior comparable period; because no full-year figure is yet disclosed, no annual policy comparison is possible.

What matters

Debtor-days spike signals deferred rent, not normal business

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$268m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

Capital raise is explicitly linked in the filing to balance-sheet leverage, with NZ$361m capital raised.

At 36.0 days — 22.3 days above the historical mean — the receivables build almost certainly reflects COVID-related rent abatements or deferrals that have not yet converted to cash. This matters because operating cash flow can look healthy while a growing uncollected receivable balance absorbs what would otherwise be cash income; the NZ$15.2m working-capital build is within the historical range but is itself driven by this receivables accumulation.

The PBT-versus-operating-profit divergence needs unpacking. Management's preferred operating profit of NZ$55.2m is 8.4% lower than the prior comparable, whereas statutory PBT of NZ$64.2m is 35.7% higher. The gap implies property valuation or other non-cash gains are lifting statutory PBT above the recurring rental earnings line. Investors relying on statutory profit as the durability signal would overstate recurring income.

Leverage is improving but the asset base is shrinking. Total assets fell to NZ$3.3b — at the lower edge of the company's historical range against a five-period mean of NZ$3.3b — while liabilities fell faster, producing modest equity erosion of NZ$29.2m. Deleveraging is credit-positive, but if asset values continue to compress, the gearing ratio improvement may reflect denominator shrinkage rather than balance-sheet strengthening.

Expectations

No formal earnings guidance was provided for FY21

The FY20 anchor year showed NPAT was heavily second-half-negative, driven by property write-downs in the pandemic; the HY20 first-half contributed a NZ$36.8m NPAT against a full-year loss of NZ$186.7m. HY21's NZ$54.2m NPAT therefore represents a genuine recovery in the first half, but a fair read requires watching whether valuation gains in this period reverse in the second half, as they did in the prior year.

Announced COVID-related rent abatements were flagged in the FY20 full-year release as expected to impact FFO by NZ$20m. This briefing cannot confirm how much of that has been absorbed in HY21 versus deferred into the receivables balance, which is the key uncertainty for the second half.

Quality of result

The operating cash flow of NZ$56.7m is real cash but its quality is qualified by the NZ$15.2m receivables build: some rental income that appears in revenue and earnings has not yet been collected

Pre-lease FCF of NZ$-20.6m is within the historical range (five-period mean NZ$-9.3m) given high capex intensity of 68.9% of revenue, but the shortfall confirms the portfolio is a net consumer of cash during the investment phase.

Statutory PBT and NPAT margins — at 57.2% and 48.3% respectively — sit at the upper edge of Annolyse's historical range against five-period means of 13.5% and 2.4%. This elevation is largely driven by the non-cash property valuation gain of NZ$11.8m and a lower effective tax rate of 15.5% versus 22.3% in the prior comparable. The recurring rental earnings base, as captured in management's operating profit measure, is weaker than the statutory numbers imply.

ROE of 2.7% is above Annolyse's historical range for recent comparable periods (four-period mean of -1.6%), reflecting the non-cash valuation uplift rather than improved cash returns on the equity base.

Unresolved

Open questions

What portion of the NZ$22.2m trade-debtor balance represents genuinely deferred versus formally abated (and therefore forgiven) rent, and what is the expected collection timeline?
Why does the statutory PBT of NZ$64.2m exceed management's operating profit of NZ$55.2m by NZ$9.0m, and what specific non-cash items — valuation gains, derivative fair values, or other — account for the gap?
How does the company expect the NTA per share of NZ$1.29 to hold if cap rates shift or further abatements are required in the second half?
Will the interim dividend of 2.2 cents per share be the only distribution for the full year, or is a second-half payment expected, and on what earnings basis is the 95% AFFO payout ratio calculated?
Is the potential disposal of The Plaza, Palmerston North, at an advanced enough stage to provide proceeds visibility for FY21 debt reduction?

This briefing cannot assess the recoverability of deferred receivables, the quantum of second-half valuation risk, or the full-year distributable earnings outlook without management's rent-collection data and updated cap-rate assumptions.

Chat

Ask about KPG HY21

Ask follow-up questions about Kiwi Property Group's HY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about KPG HY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Kiwi Property Group's HY21 result.

What portion of the NZ$22.2m trade-debtor balance represents genuinely deferred versus formally abated (and therefore forgiven) rent, and what is the expected collection timeline?Why does "Debtor-days spike signals deferred rent, not normal business" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY21?What should I watch next for KPG after HY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

KPG 1H21 Financial statements

HY21 / financial report↗

KPG 1H21 NZX release

HY21 / results release↗

KPG 1H21 Results announcement

HY21 / results announcement↗

KPG 1H21 Results presentation

HY21 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Half year result financial statements

HY20 / financial report↗

Half year result NZX release

HY20 / results release↗

Half year result presentation

HY20 / results presentation↗

Half year results announcement

HY20 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

FY20 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

NZX Results announcement

FY20 / results announcement↗

NZX Results announcement

FY20 / results release↗

Release context

Results of annual meeting

HY20 / commentary↗

Results of Kiwi Property 2020 annual meeting

HY21 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 11.6pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 95.0% on an AFFO basis, with NPAT payout at 63.6%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -5.1% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 2.7%, +0.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when KPG publishes next

Get the next Kiwi Property Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.