Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC) / FY20

PBT up 58% on continuing ops, but operating cash flow fell 22%

Continuing-operations revenue grew 3.4% after the farm automation exit, while cash conversion weakened as capex more than doubled to $15.5m.

Primary Industries / Dairy genetics

LIC metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$170.3m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EPS

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

0.54x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

10.2%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
22 July 2021
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY20 vs FY19

Revenue

$249m

-2.0% ↓ vs $254m

Net profit after tax

$22.9m

+30.9% ↑ vs $17.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$40.5m

-22.2% ↓ vs $52m

Final dividend per share

12.5c

-1.9% ↓ vs 12.7c

Profit before tax

$31m

+58.2% ↑ vs $19.6m

Cash and cash equivalents

$18.8m

+14.1% ↑ vs $16.5m

Total assets

$382m

+0.5% ↑ vs $379.9m

What changed

LIC exited its farm automation business during the year, recognising a $0.7m after-tax loss on the discontinued operation

That changes the read on the headline comparison: reported revenue of $249.0m is continuing-operations only and is 2.0% below the $254.0m prior total, but on a like-for-like continuing basis (excluding $18.4m of prior-year automation revenue) the underlying business grew 3.4% from $240.9m.

Profit before tax from continuing operations rose 58.2% to $31.0m, but NPAT grew only 30.9% to $22.9m because the effective tax rate normalised from 10.6% to 23.9%. Operating cash flow fell 22.2% to $40.5m while capex rose 148.9% to $15.5m, taking cash conversion sharply lower even as the balance sheet finished with no debt (vs $1.6m prior) and $18.8m of cash.

What matters

Operating leverage in the continuing business is real

  • PBT growth of 58.2% on 3.4% continuing-revenue growth was driven by margin expansion in the higher-mix segments: herd testing result rose to $20.1m on revenue of $35.4m (gross margin 56.8% from 33.7%), and farm software result rose to $36.6m on revenue of $50.8m (gross margin 72.1% from 62.4%). This matters because mix is shifting toward higher-margin, less cyclical revenue streams.
  • Tax distortion suppresses the NPAT signal. The +27.3 percentage-point gap between PBT and NPAT growth is almost entirely a tax-rate effect. PBT growth is the cleaner read on operating performance; users anchoring to the 30.9% NPAT figure will understate underlying earnings improvement.
  • Cash conversion deteriorated even as profit rose. OCF fell $11.6m while PBT rose $11.4m, and capex more than doubled to $15.5m (6.2% of revenue, up from a net inflow on disposals last year). FCF pre-lease of $25.0m covered the $17.8m dividend (FCF payout 71.3%), but the prior year's exceptional $58.2m of FCF and 103.5% NPAT payout are not a useful baseline.

Expectations

No forward targets or shape context are provided, so this release cannot be judged against management guidance

The relevant questions are durability rather than pacing: whether the herd testing and farm software margin step-ups are sustainable, whether the elevated capex run-rate (split roughly evenly between software development and physical assets) becomes recurring, and whether the tax rate stays near 23.9%. The 78.2% NPAT payout looks more sustainable than the 103.5% prior payout, but the lower dividend per share (12.51c vs 12.75c) signals the board is calibrating to a more normalised earnings and cash base rather than the prior year's tax-assisted print.

Quality of result

The underlying operating result looks durable

PBT growth comes from the core continuing segments, with herd testing and farm software both expanding margin meaningfully and NZ market genetics holding share at 39.9% of revenue. The disposal of farm automation removes a low-margin business (27.4% gross margin last year on $18.4m revenue) and should be earnings-accretive on mix.

The cash quality is the weaker side of the print. OCF fell 22.2% against rising profit, which means working capital and timing absorbed cash even before the capex step-up. Receivable days extended to 63.0 from 59.2, partly offsetting an inventory release. The 148.9% capex increase ($7.7m software development plus $7.8m of land, buildings and equipment) is investment rather than deterioration, but it materially lowered FCF-to-NPAT to 108.8% from an unusually high 333% prior. Investors should treat the prior-year FCF and payout ratios as the anomaly, not the current year.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected steady-state capex run-rate now that software development spend has stepped up to $7.7m?
Why did receivable days extend to 63.0, and is this a structural change in customer mix or timing?
How much of the herd testing and farm software margin expansion is volume leverage versus pricing or cost reset, and is it sustainable into next year?
What residual costs, contingent liabilities, or earn-outs remain from the farm automation exit beyond the $0.7m after-tax loss?
Will the effective tax rate stay near 23.9%, or were prior-year items (which drove the 10.6% rate) one-off?

This briefing cannot assess management's forward outlook, segment guidance, or capital-return policy beyond what is disclosed in the supplied release.

Chat

Ask about LIC FY20

Ask follow-up questions about Livestock Improvement Corporation's FY20 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about LIC FY20

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Livestock Improvement Corporation's FY20 result.

What is the expected steady-state capex run-rate now that software development spend has stepped up to $7.7m?Why does "Operating leverage in the continuing business is real" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY20?What should I watch next for LIC after FY20?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report July 2021

FY20 / financial report↗

Market Statement July 2021

FY20 / results announcement↗

Market Statement July 2021

FY20 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report

FY19 / financial report↗

Financial Results Announcement

FY19 / results announcement↗

Financial Results Announcement

FY19 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 27.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 61.7%, with NPAT payout at 78.2%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -2.0% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 20 days, -4 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when LIC publishes next

Get the next Livestock Improvement Corporation briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.