Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC) / FY24

PBT down 61.7% and H2 swung to a $21.2m NPAT loss

Operating deterioration plus a sharply higher tax rate left FY24 NPAT at $7.7m, well below the $17–22m underlying earnings guided at the half.

Primary Industries / Dairy genetics

LIC revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $195.2m, versus $267.3m in FY24.

LIC operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $12.2m, versus $40.1m in FY24.

LIC working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$0.9m, versus -$30.1m in FY24.

LIC NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $33.8m, versus $7.7m in FY24.
Release date
19 July 2024
Published
18 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$267.3m

-3.3% ↓ vs $276.5m

Net profit after tax

$7.7m

-71.9% ↓ vs $27.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$40.1m

+8.9% ↑ vs $36.8m

Full-year dividend per share

5.8c

-64.3% ↓ vs 16.4c

Profit before tax

$13.8m

-61.7% ↓ vs $36m

Cash and cash equivalents

$42.3m

-22.4% ↓ vs $54.6m

Total assets

$358.6m

-6.2% ↓ vs $382.3m

What changed

Revenue fell 3.3% to $267.3m, but the operating read is much weaker than the top line suggests

Profit before tax dropped 61.7% to $13.8m, and NPAT fell 71.9% to $7.7m as the effective tax rate jumped to 43.9% from 24.0%. Because LIC reported HY24 NPAT of $29.0m, the implied second-half outcome was a loss of roughly $21.2m, swinging the result from a strong H1 to a materially loss-making H2.

Operating cash flow rose 8.9% to $40.1m despite the earnings collapse, but capex more than doubled to $27.7m (10.4% of revenue, up from 4.0%), inventories grew 61.1% to $19.9m, and the cash balance fell from $54.6m to $42.3m. The balance sheet remains debt-free. The declared final ordinary dividend is 5.84cps versus 16.38cps a year earlier, alongside a separate 13cps special paid earlier in the year from UK share-sale proceeds.

What matters

The second half drove the result, not the headline revenue decline

A 3.3% revenue fall does not produce a 61.7% PBT collapse without something more structural happening in H2. With H1 NPAT of $29.0m flipping to an implied $21.2m H2 loss, the year contains a material adverse second-half event or charge that the headline figures do not isolate. This matters because the underlying H2 run-rate, not the full-year average, is the relevant base for FY25.

Tax distortion compounded an already weak operating result. The effective tax rate of 43.9% (versus 24.0% prior) adds roughly 10 percentage points to the NPAT decline beyond the PBT decline. With PBT still down 61.7%, the cleaner operating read remains poor; the tax line simply made a bad result look worse. Whether the elevated rate reflects non-deductible items, prior-period adjustments, or jurisdictional mix is not explained in the release excerpts.

Capital intensity stepped up sharply while returns fell. Capex rose 151.8% to $27.7m — driven heavily by software development at $16.1m — lifting capex/revenue to 10.4%. ROE dropped to 2.8% from 9.2%. The combination of rising reinvestment and falling returns is the central capital-allocation tension for FY25 unless management can demonstrate the spend is generating future earnings rather than maintenance burden.

Expectations

At the half-year LIC guided FY24 underlying earnings of $17–22m

Reported NPAT of $7.7m falls well short of that range, and the company-disclosed payout (60% of underlying earnings, implying about $13.8m of underlying earnings) confirms the result missed guidance even on a non-GAAP basis. The release attributes the year to "challenging conditions" without disaggregating the H2 deterioration.

The release excerpts contain no FY25 revenue, earnings, capex, or dividend guidance, and no stated multi-year target. That absence matters: investors are left without a quantified anchor for whether the H2 weakness was a one-off, a step-down to a new base, or a sign of further pressure as the lower milk price environment continues to flow through to farmer demand.

Quality of result

Reported operating cash flow of $40.1m looks healthy against $7.7m of NPAT (160.2% conversion), but that ratio flatters the result because NPAT itself collapsed

The cash conversion is supported by a working-capital release at the receivable line — debtors of $37.6m at the prior balance date have been replaced in the inventory line by a $7.6m inventory build, with inventory days nearly doubling to 27.2 from 16.3. That direction in inventory is unfavourable for cash quality going into FY25 and is the opposite of what a deteriorating earnings backdrop normally wants.

Free cash flow pre-lease fell to $12.4m from $25.8m as capex absorbed most of the operating cash uplift. The 5.84cps ordinary dividend is covered by FCF (67.0% payout) but exceeds NPAT (116.8% payout), meaning capital return is being funded out of pre-investment cash rather than reported earnings. With cash on hand down $12.3m year-on-year and capex running at roughly 2.5x its prior rate, the room for further policy of this kind is narrower than the debt-free balance sheet implies in isolation.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove the H2 swing from a $29.0m H1 NPAT to an implied $21.2m H2 loss, and how much of it is non-recurring?
Why did the effective tax rate jump from 24.0% to 43.9%, and is the elevated rate expected to persist in FY25?
What is the inventory build of 61.1% composed of, and is the elevated stock position a deliberate positioning ahead of FY25 or a demand-related accumulation?
How much of the $16.1m software development spend is capitalised versus expensed in future periods, and what is the expected revenue contribution and payback?
What is the FY25 ordinary dividend policy now that the underlying earnings base appears materially lower than the prior year?

This briefing cannot assess what specific events or charges sit inside the H2 result, because the release excerpts do not disaggregate them.

Chat

Ask about LIC FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Livestock Improvement Corporation's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about LIC FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Livestock Improvement Corporation's FY24 result.

What specifically drove the H2 swing from a $29.0m H1 NPAT to an implied $21.2m H2 loss, and how much of it is non-recurring?Why does "The second half drove the result, not the headline revenue decline" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for LIC after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

LIC FY 2023-24 Financial Results

FY24 / results announcement↗

LIC FY 2023-24 Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

LIC Market Statement

FY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

LIC FY2022-23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

Market Statement - LIC full year result 2022-23

FY23 / results release↗

Interim context

Interim Accounts

HY24 / financial report↗

Media Release

HY24 / media release↗

Results announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Release context

AGM 2024 Date

FY24 / commentary↗

LIC 2023 AGM Chief Executive and Chair Address

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 10.2pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 60.0% on a company-disclosed basis, with NPAT payout at 116.8%.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 27 days, +11 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 2.8%, -6.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when LIC publishes next

Get the next Livestock Improvement Corporation briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.