Revenue
$2b
-11.0% ↓ vs $2.3b
Record wind and second-best lake inflows drove a $485m PBT swing, but the prior comparable was depressed by hydro and gas constraints.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDAF margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY26 vs HY25
Revenue
$2b
-11.0% ↓ vs $2.3b
Net profit after tax
$227m
+287.6% ↑ vs −$121m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$336m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Interim dividend per share
6.4c
+4.1% ↑ vs 6.2c
EBITDAF
$506m
+96.9% ↑ vs $257m
Profit before tax
$317m
+288.7% ↑ vs −$168m
Cash and cash equivalents
$183m
+64.9% ↑ vs $111m
Total assets
$15.1b
+16.5% ↑ vs $13b
What changed
Management cites record wind generation, the second-best lake inflows on record, and record retail sales volumes (+12%). NPAT followed at $227m versus a $121m loss (+287.6%), with the 1.1pp gap to PBT growth indicating no meaningful tax distortion.
Revenue, however, fell 11.0% to $2b – classified as below the company's recent historical range (3-period mean +12.1%) – because lower wholesale price exposure and the absence of the prior-period hedge cost recovery compressed the top line even as margin expanded sharply.
Operating cash flow leapt to $336m from $50m. Net debt/EBITDA strengthened to 3.33x from 6.0x, and the interim dividend rose 4.1% to 6.4 cps.
What matters
PBT growth of 288.7% sits well above the company's historical range (3-period mean -43.6%), but it comes off a HY25 base depressed by record-low inflows, an unprecedented domestic gas shortage, and the calling of the largest demand response option with NZAS. EBITDAF margin recovery to a 15.8% PBT margin (upper edge of the historical 3-period range) is real, but the lift is largely the absence of last year's exceptional cost rather than a step-change in underlying economics.
Cash conversion swung dramatically but off a distorted base. OCF/EBITDA at 66.4% versus 19.5% looks transformative, yet the prior reading was abnormally low because of hedge settlement costs. The current 66.4% sits below typical gentailer norms, so cash quality has recovered rather than become outstanding.
Leverage strengthened despite higher absolute borrowings. Net debt/EBITDA fell to 3.33x – within the company's historical range (mean 3.62x) – purely because EBITDAF rebased upward. Absolute net debt still rose to $1.7b from $1.5b, and total assets are now $15.1b, materially above the historical mean of $11b, reflecting an expanding balance sheet supporting growth capex.
Expectations
The supplied seasonality shape shows HY25 contributed only 42.1% of FY25 EBITDAF and 46.6% of FY25 revenue – an unusually back-end-loaded year because of the HY25 hydro shock. With HY26 EBITDAF of $506m already exceeding the implied 2H FY25 EBITDAF of $354m, the read into the full year depends on whether second-half hydrology and wind conditions hold and whether retail volume growth (+12%) sustains.
The release flags an indicative growth capex range of $315–$345m and a target FID in Q4 2026, signalling continued capital intensity ahead. This matters because the leverage improvement is EBITDAF-driven; if hydrology mean-reverts, the 3.33x ratio will widen against a higher absolute debt base.
Quality of result
The $485m PBT swing decomposes into the unwind of HY25's exceptional hedge and demand response costs plus favourable hydrology and wind conditions – none of which the company controls period-to-period. Underlying retail volume growth (+12%) and regulated transmission revenue (+6.6–6.8%) are the more durable contributors, but they are not sized in the available excerpts.
Cash quality is supportive without being exceptional. FCF pre-lease of $250m converted at 110.1% of NPAT, helped by capex falling to $86m (4.3% of revenue) from $104m. Working capital was broadly stable: trade receivables held at $295m and debtor days at 26.7 (lower edge of the historical 24.0–39.5 range), so the cash beat was not balance-sheet-assisted.
The 74.4% NPAT payout sits within the company's historical range, but on an underlying basis – stripping out fair-value movements management explicitly excludes – the dividend cover read is harder to verify from the disclosed excerpts.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess forward hydrology, wholesale price paths, or the underlying (ex-fair-value) NPAT bridge, none of which are quantified in the supplied excerpts.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Meridian Energy's HY26 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
Condensed Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 31 December 2025
HY26 / financial reportInvestor Presentation
HY26 / results presentationMedia Announcement
HY26 / results releaseNZX Results Announcement
HY26 / results announcementCondensed Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 31 December 2024
HY25 / financial reportMedia Announcement
HY25 / results releaseNZX Results Announcement
HY25 / results announcementMedia Announcement
FY25 / results releaseMeridian Integrated Report FY25
FY25 / financial reportNZX Results Announcement
FY25 / results announcementInterim results webcast and conference call registration details
HY26 / commentaryInvestor Day Presentation
HY26 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is 3.33x, -2.69x versus the prior comparable period.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 66.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +46.9pp versus the prior comparable period.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Dividend payout versus NPAT is 74.4%.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 1.1pp.
Get the next Meridian Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.