Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology
  • API Reference

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Meridian Energy (MEL) / HY26

Result released25 February 2026·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

PBT recovered 288.7% from a hedge-crisis loss, masking revenue's 11% decline

Meridian's profit swing reflects last year's hedging crisis easing, not underlying growth, since revenue fell 11.0%.

Energy & Utilities / Integrated gentailer

MEL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $2b, versus $2.3b in HY25.

MEL EBITDAF margin

EBITDAF margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 MEL HY: Outside range high ebitda margin. 27.8%; 3-period range 11.4% to 25.2%. EBITDA margin: 27.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 19.2%, range 11.4%-25.2%.
  • HY25 MEL HY: Outside range low ebitda margin. 11.4%; 3-period range 21% to 27.8%. EBITDA margin: 11.4%, below normal range; 3-period mean 24.7%, range 21.0%-27.8%.
EBITDA margin: 11.4%, below normal range; 3-period mean 24.7%, range 21.0%-27.8%.

MEL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $336m, versus $50m in HY25.

MEL NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $227m, versus -$121m in HY25.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 20 July 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$14.9b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.04

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

21.31x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

27.46x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.67x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

3.8%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
25 February 2026
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$2b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$227m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$336m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

6.4c

+4.1% ↑ vs 6.2c

EBITDAF

$506m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Profit before tax

$317m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Cash and cash equivalents

$183m

+64.9% ↑ vs $111m

Total assets

$15.1b

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofMEL HY26·Result released25 February 2026·Annolyse analysis published22 April 2026

What changed

Profit before tax rose 288.7% to NZ$317.0m and NPAT rose 287.6% to NZ$227.0m, but this is a base-effect recovery, not comparable growth: the prior half was a NZ$168.0m pre-tax loss caused by record-low inflows, an unexpected domestic gas shortage, and the largest demand-response call to the Aluminium Smelter

Annolyse's historical baseline classifies this PBT growth rate as above its normal range (three-period mean -43.6%), which signals the comparison is being flattered by an unusually weak prior base rather than a repeatable step-change.

Revenue fell 11.0% to NZ$2b, below the historical range (three-period mean +12.1%), even as EBITDAF nearly doubled to NZ$506.0m on record wind generation and the second-best lake inflows on record. Gross borrowings rose 118.8% to NZ$3.6b, lifting total assets 16.5% to NZ$15.1b, above the historical range (mean NZ$11b), while net debt/EBITDA improved to 3.33x from 6.01x.

What matters

Growth optics versus operating reality

The 288.7% PBT and 287.6% NPAT growth headlines are mathematically real but economically distorted by last year's hedging crisis; the effective tax rate also swung to -28.4% from 27.0%, adding noise to the NPAT read. Investors comparing this half to consensus growth expectations should anchor to the underlying generation and margin recovery rather than the percentage itself.

Debt-funded balance-sheet expansion. Gross borrowings more than doubled to NZ$3.6b and total assets are now above Meridian's historical range, funding a growth capital programme (indicative capex NZ$315m-NZ$345m, 85MW/360GWh, FID targeted Q4 2026). Leverage still improved to 3.33x net debt/EBITDA because EBITDAF recovery outpaced the debt increase, but the direction of gross debt matters for financial flexibility if hydrology turns again.

Segment mix is uneven. Wholesale contributed a NZ$563.0m result while Retail was a NZ$21.0m loss and Other/unallocated a NZ$36.0m loss, despite record retail sales volumes up 12%. This means volume growth in retail is not yet translating into segment profit, which matters for anyone assessing the durability of the EBITDAF recovery beyond wholesale generation conditions.

Expectations

No stated full-year targets or guidance are disclosed in this release, so the result cannot be judged against a management-set bar

Meridian's own second-half shape context shows the prior comparable half (HY25) represented only 26.8% of FY25's full-year NPAT, illustrating how skewed hydrology-driven half-year results can be; that pattern was itself a loss year, so it cannot be used to infer this year's second-half trajectory.

Absent forward guidance, the release supports a read on operating recovery from an unusually poor prior half but does not support extrapolating the 288.7% PBT growth rate or the current EBITDAF level into the full year.

Quality of result

Cash quality genuinely improved: operating cash flow rose to NZ$336.0m from NZ$50.0m, lifting OCF/EBITDAF conversion to 66.4% from 19.5%, and capex intensity remained modest at 4.3% of revenue

This is a durable quality signal because it reflects lower hedge-cost cash outflows and better generation conditions rather than working-capital timing; trade debtors were broadly flat at NZ$295.0m versus NZ$297.0m.

That said, the scale of the NPAT and PBT growth rates is inflated by comparison against a genuinely distressed prior half, so the headline percentages should not be read as evidence of a structurally higher earnings run-rate. The interim dividend of 6.4 cents per share compares to a 6.15 cents prior interim component; this is the current declared instalment only and should not be read as a statement about full-year dividend policy.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is management's outlook for hedge and demand-response costs if hydrology conditions normalise or worsen again?
Why did Retail post a loss despite record 12% volume growth, and when does management expect Retail profitability to turn positive?
How does the NZ$3,625.0m gross borrowings level, versus NZ$1,657.0m a year earlier, affect covenant headroom and credit metrics as the growth capex programme proceeds toward the Q4 2026 FID?
Will the full-year dividend track NPAT given the current 74.4% payout ratio against NPAT, or is that ratio itself distorted by the low prior-year base?

This briefing cannot assess forward hydrology risk, wholesale price forecasts, or the sustainability of the current EBITDAF level beyond the information disclosed in this half-year release.

Chat

Ask about MEL HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Meridian Energy's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MEL HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Meridian Energy's HY26 result.

What is management's outlook for hedge and demand-response costs if hydrology conditions normalise or worsen again?Why does "Growth optics versus operating reality" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for MEL after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Condensed Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 31 December 2025

HY26 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Media Announcement

HY26 / results release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Condensed Interim Financial Statements for the six months ended 31 December 2024

HY25 / financial report↗

Media Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Media Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

Meridian Integrated Report FY25

FY25 / financial report↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Interim results webcast and conference call registration details

HY26 / commentary↗

Investor Day Presentation

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.33x, -2.69x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 66.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +46.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 74.4%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 1.1pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MEL publishes next

Get the next Meridian Energy briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.