Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
My Food Bag Group (MFB) / FY26

Debtor days hit unprecedented 3.0 as receivables more than tripled

Working capital absorbed NZ$1.5m against a historical mean of NZ$-0.1m, yet net debt still fell NZ$5.1m on stronger free cash flow.

Consumer / Meal kits

MFB revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $170.2m, versus $85.4m in HY26.

MFB EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MFB: Outside range high ebitda margin. 17.6%; 3-period range 9.6% to 10.4%. EBITDA margin: 17.6%, above normal range; 3-period mean 10.0%, range 9.6%-10.4%.
  • HY23 MFB: Outside range high ebitda margin. 12.2%; 3-period range 8.4% to 9.5%. EBITDA margin: 12.2%, above normal range; 3-period mean 8.9%, range 8.4%-9.5%.
  • HY26 MFB: Outside range low ebitda margin. 8.4%; 3-period range 8.8% to 12.2%. EBITDA margin: 8.4%, below normal range; 3-period mean 10.2%, range 8.8%-12.2%.
  • FY26 MFB: Outside range low ebitda margin. 9.6%; 3-period range 9.9% to 17.6%. EBITDA margin: 9.6%, below normal range; 3-period mean 12.6%, range 9.9%-17.6%.
EBITDA margin: 9.6%, below normal range; 3-period mean 12.6%, range 9.9%-17.6%.

MFB operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $13.5m, versus $5.8m in HY26.

MFB working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 MFB: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-0.3m; 4-period range $-0.1m to $1.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.3m, below normal range; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.0m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.1m.
  • HY25 MFB: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.6m; 3-period range $-0.7m to $4.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.6m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.6m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.7m.
  • HY26 MFB: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $4.4m; 3-period range $-1.6m to $2.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$4.4m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.7m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-1.1m.
  • FY26 MFB: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $1.5m; 4-period range $-0.3m to $1.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-0.2m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-0.2m.
Release date
21 May 2026
Published
21 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$170.2m

+5.0% ↑ vs $162.1m

EBITDA

$16.4m

+1.9% ↑ vs $16.1m

Net profit after tax

$6.7m

+4.7% ↑ vs $6.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$13.5m

+2.3% ↑ vs $13.2m

Full-year dividend per share

1.9c

flat vs 1.9c

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.62m

-59.4% ↓ vs $1.5m

Total assets

$106.8m

+3.2% ↑ vs $103.5m

What changed

Working capital absorbed NZ$1.5m in FY26, above MFB's historical pattern where comparable builds averaged NZ$0.8m and the four-period mean was a release of NZ$0.1m

The driver was trade receivables, which more than tripled to NZ$1.4m and pushed debtor days to 3.0 — an unprecedented high against a four-period historical mean of 0.8 days and a prior range of 0.5-1.2 days.

Headline dollar movements were positive: revenue lifted to NZ$170.2m from NZ$162.1m, EBITDA to NZ$16.4m from NZ$16.1m, and NPAT to NZ$6.7m from NZ$6.4m. Source disclosures reference revenue from continuing operations, so the reported growth percentages carry a basis-discontinuity caveat and are not cited here as specific figures; the NPAT and PBT growth comparisons are not analytically comparable on a clean trend basis for the same reason.

Net debt fell NZ$5.1m to NZ$1.9m as gross borrowings reduced from NZ$8.5m to NZ$2.5m, and free cash flow rose to NZ$8.5m from NZ$7.6m.

What matters

Receivables build is the central anomaly

Debtor days of 3.0 sit well above the 0.5-1.2 day historical band, and trade receivables jumped from NZ$0.3m to NZ$1.4m. With no commentary in the supplied excerpts explaining the change, the read-through to FY27 cash conversion depends on whether this is a year-end timing position that unwinds in H1 or a structural shift in collection terms.

Leverage stepped down meaningfully. Net debt of NZ$1.9m versus NZ$6.9m a year ago, and net debt to EBITDA of just 0.1x, give MFB material balance-sheet flexibility. This matters because the business now has optionality to fund growth investment, sustain distributions, or absorb a softer trading period without refinancing pressure.

EBITDA and NPAT margins remain below historical range. EBITDA margin of 9.6% sits below the 9.9%-17.6% historical band, and NPAT margin at 3.9% also reads below the 5.8% four-period mean. The dollar uplift came from the revenue line rather than margin recovery toward the 12.6% EBITDA mean; the NPAT dollar increase itself is not a clean like-for-like trend given the continuing-operations basis caveat.

Expectations

No stated FY27 targets are present in the supplied excerpts beyond an "FY27 outlook" header without disclosed content

The release notes H2 revenue growth of 6.2%, and the half-year shape shows MFB delivered 50.2% of revenue in H1 but only 43.9% of EBITDA and 42.7% of NPAT in that period — earnings were second-half weighted.

Against the historical EBITDA margin band of 9.9%-17.6%, the FY26 print of 9.6% leaves limited operating leverage cushion if revenue softens. What this briefing cannot verify from the supplied excerpts is whether management has set or reaffirmed any explicit FY27 revenue, margin, or EBITDA target.

Quality of result

Cash conversion of 82.5% sits within MFB's historical range (mean 74.1%, range 53.6%-86.4%), and FCF-to-NPAT of 127.2% means reported earnings translated into more than NPAT-equivalent cash

The effective tax rate of 25.6% versus 26.5% prior is within the historical range, so no tax distortion is flattering the result this year, though the underlying NPAT dollar comparison still carries the continuing-operations basis caveat noted above and should not be read as a clean trend.

However, conversion held only because the absolute working capital build remained modest despite the unusual receivables jump, and inventory days fell to the lower edge of the historical band at 1.8 days against a 0.9-4.9 day range. The combination — receivables up sharply, inventory at the bottom of the band, and cash falling from NZ$1.5m to NZ$0.6m even as borrowings reduced — suggests timing and balance-sheet positioning, more than underlying operating improvement, supported the cash quality print.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did debtor days lift to an unprecedented 3.0 days from a historical mean of 0.8, and is the NZ$1.4m receivables balance expected to reverse in H1 FY27?
What basis adjustment underlies the shift to reporting "revenue from continuing operations", and which activities are now excluded from the NPAT and PBT comparisons?
Why did inventory days fall to 1.8 against a historical range of 0.9-4.9, and is this a deliberate working-capital position or a supply-side timing effect?
What does the FY27 outlook contain, and does management have a credible path back toward the 12.6% historical EBITDA margin mean?
Will the materially lower NZ$1.9m net debt position be deployed into growth investment, distributions, or retained as buffer?

This briefing cannot assess management's commentary on the receivables movement, the FY27 outlook content, or the nature of the continuing-operations basis change because those disclosures are not present in the supplied excerpts.

Chat

Ask about MFB FY26

Ask follow-up questions about My Food Bag Group's FY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MFB FY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about My Food Bag Group's FY26 result.

Why did debtor days lift to an unprecedented 3.0 days from a historical mean of 0.8, and is the NZ$1.4m receivables balance expected to reverse in H1 FY27?Why does "Receivables build is the central anomaly" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY26?What should I watch next for MFB after FY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

company filing - FY26

FY26 / results announcement↗

MFB Annual Report - FY26

FY26 / financial report↗

MFB Media Release - FY26 Results

FY26 / media release↗

MFB Results Presentation - FY26

FY26 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report FY25

FY25 / financial report↗

company filing

FY25 / results announcement↗

Media Release - MFB FY25 Results

FY25 / media release↗

Results Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Interim context

company filing

HY26 / results announcement↗

Interim Report

HY26 / financial report↗

Interim Results Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

Release context

FY25 Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details

FY25 / commentary↗

My Food Bag Market Update: FY25 Return to Growth

FY25 / commentary↗

FY26 Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details

FY26 / commentary↗

FY26 Interim Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details

HY26 / commentary↗

Results of 2025 Annual Meeting

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 82.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +0.4pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 72.0% on a NPAT basis, with NPAT payout at 63.3%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.11x, -0.32x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MFB publishes next

Get the next My Food Bag Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.