Revenue
$170.2m
+5.0% ↑ vs $162.1m
Working capital absorbed NZ$1.5m against a historical mean of NZ$-0.1m, yet net debt still fell NZ$5.1m on stronger free cash flow.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY26 vs FY25
Revenue
$170.2m
+5.0% ↑ vs $162.1m
EBITDA
$16.4m
+1.9% ↑ vs $16.1m
Net profit after tax
$6.7m
+4.7% ↑ vs $6.4m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$13.5m
+2.3% ↑ vs $13.2m
Full-year dividend per share
1.9c
flat vs 1.9c
Cash and cash equivalents
$0.62m
-59.4% ↓ vs $1.5m
Total assets
$106.8m
+3.2% ↑ vs $103.5m
What changed
The driver was trade receivables, which more than tripled to NZ$1.4m and pushed debtor days to 3.0 — an unprecedented high against a four-period historical mean of 0.8 days and a prior range of 0.5-1.2 days.
Headline dollar movements were positive: revenue lifted to NZ$170.2m from NZ$162.1m, EBITDA to NZ$16.4m from NZ$16.1m, and NPAT to NZ$6.7m from NZ$6.4m. Source disclosures reference revenue from continuing operations, so the reported growth percentages carry a basis-discontinuity caveat and are not cited here as specific figures; the NPAT and PBT growth comparisons are not analytically comparable on a clean trend basis for the same reason.
Net debt fell NZ$5.1m to NZ$1.9m as gross borrowings reduced from NZ$8.5m to NZ$2.5m, and free cash flow rose to NZ$8.5m from NZ$7.6m.
What matters
Debtor days of 3.0 sit well above the 0.5-1.2 day historical band, and trade receivables jumped from NZ$0.3m to NZ$1.4m. With no commentary in the supplied excerpts explaining the change, the read-through to FY27 cash conversion depends on whether this is a year-end timing position that unwinds in H1 or a structural shift in collection terms.
Leverage stepped down meaningfully. Net debt of NZ$1.9m versus NZ$6.9m a year ago, and net debt to EBITDA of just 0.1x, give MFB material balance-sheet flexibility. This matters because the business now has optionality to fund growth investment, sustain distributions, or absorb a softer trading period without refinancing pressure.
EBITDA and NPAT margins remain below historical range. EBITDA margin of 9.6% sits below the 9.9%-17.6% historical band, and NPAT margin at 3.9% also reads below the 5.8% four-period mean. The dollar uplift came from the revenue line rather than margin recovery toward the 12.6% EBITDA mean; the NPAT dollar increase itself is not a clean like-for-like trend given the continuing-operations basis caveat.
Expectations
The release notes H2 revenue growth of 6.2%, and the half-year shape shows MFB delivered 50.2% of revenue in H1 but only 43.9% of EBITDA and 42.7% of NPAT in that period — earnings were second-half weighted.
Against the historical EBITDA margin band of 9.9%-17.6%, the FY26 print of 9.6% leaves limited operating leverage cushion if revenue softens. What this briefing cannot verify from the supplied excerpts is whether management has set or reaffirmed any explicit FY27 revenue, margin, or EBITDA target.
Quality of result
The effective tax rate of 25.6% versus 26.5% prior is within the historical range, so no tax distortion is flattering the result this year, though the underlying NPAT dollar comparison still carries the continuing-operations basis caveat noted above and should not be read as a clean trend.
However, conversion held only because the absolute working capital build remained modest despite the unusual receivables jump, and inventory days fell to the lower edge of the historical band at 1.8 days against a 0.9-4.9 day range. The combination — receivables up sharply, inventory at the bottom of the band, and cash falling from NZ$1.5m to NZ$0.6m even as borrowings reduced — suggests timing and balance-sheet positioning, more than underlying operating improvement, supported the cash quality print.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess management's commentary on the receivables movement, the FY27 outlook content, or the nature of the continuing-operations basis change because those disclosures are not present in the supplied excerpts.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about My Food Bag Group's FY26 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
company filing - FY26
FY26 / results announcementMFB Annual Report - FY26
FY26 / financial reportMFB Media Release - FY26 Results
FY26 / media releaseMFB Results Presentation - FY26
FY26 / results presentationAnnual Report FY25
FY25 / financial reportcompany filing
FY25 / results announcementMedia Release - MFB FY25 Results
FY25 / media releaseResults Presentation
FY25 / results presentationcompany filing
HY26 / results announcementInterim Report
HY26 / financial reportInterim Results Presentation
HY26 / results presentationFY25 Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details
FY25 / commentaryMy Food Bag Market Update: FY25 Return to Growth
FY25 / commentaryFY26 Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details
FY26 / commentaryFY26 Interim Results Announcement Date and Briefing Details
HY26 / commentaryResults of 2025 Annual Meeting
HY26 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 82.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +0.4pp versus the prior comparable period.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Company-disclosed payout ratio is 72.0% on a NPAT basis, with NPAT payout at 63.3%.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is 0.11x, -0.32x versus the prior comparable period.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.0pp.
Get the next My Food Bag Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.