Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Metro Performance Glass (MPG) / HY23

Revenue surged 18.2% but a NZ$25.6m working-capital build crushed cash

Operating cash flow fell 82% and debtor days hit an unprecedented 56.4 even as Metroglass reported its first revenue acceleration in years.

Construction & Materials / Building products

MPG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $208.2m, versus $108m in HY26.

MPG EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MPG: Outside range high ebitda margin. 10.4%; 4-period range 2.6% to 8.7%. EBITDA margin: 10.4%, above normal range; 4-period mean 5.9%, range 2.6%-8.7%.
  • HY24 MPG: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 12.7%; 4-period range 8.1% to 10.9%. EBITDA margin: 12.7%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 9.6%, range 8.1%-10.9%.
  • HY25 MPG: Outside range low ebitda margin. 8.1%; 4-period range 8.8% to 12.7%. EBITDA margin: 8.1%, below normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 8.8%-12.7%.
  • FY25 MPG: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 2.6%; 4-period range 5.1% to 10.4%. EBITDA margin: 2.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 7.9%, range 5.1%-10.4%.
EBITDA margin: 2.6%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 7.9%, range 5.1%-10.4%.

MPG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $15.7m, versus $5.8m in HY26.

MPG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 MPG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $10m; 4-period range $-10.9m to $7.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$10.0m, above normal range; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.5m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-5.5m.
  • HY23 MPG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $25.6m; 4-period range $-9.6m to $-1.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$25.6m, unprecedented high; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-5.7m.
  • HY24 MPG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-9.6m; 4-period range $-7.2m to $25.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-9.6m, below normal range; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$25.6m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-4.4m.
  • FY24 MPG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-10.9m; 4-period range $-5.1m to $10m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-10.9m, unprecedented low; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.7m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-10.9m, unprecedented low; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.7m.
Release date
29 November 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$138.1m

+18.2% ↑ vs $116.9m

EBITDA

$15.1m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$0.6m

+50.0% ↑ vs $0.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$1.8m

-82.2% ↓ vs $9.9m

Operating profit

$5.6m

+84.4% ↑ vs $3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$12m

-12.4% ↓ vs $13.7m

Total assets

$285.7m

+18.4% ↑ vs $241.2m

What changed

The dominant feature of this result is a NZ$25.6m absorption of operating working capital, which is well outside Annolyse's historical baseline of NZ$6.2m of average net release across the prior three half-year comparisons

That swing is the immediate cause of operating cash flow falling to NZ$1.8m from NZ$9.9m (-82.2%), and of pre-lease free cash flow turning negative at NZ$-3.1m versus the historical range of NZ$1.9m–NZ$11.4m positive.

Revenue grew 18.2% to NZ$138.1m, an unprecedented high relative to the historical pattern of negative or flat half-year growth, supported by 14% New Zealand growth (driven by additional trading days versus the prior lockdown-affected period) and 32% AGG growth (driven by price increases). PBT was flat at NZ$0.6m (+0.0%), while NPAT rose 50.0% to NZ$0.6m on a lower 13.6% effective tax rate versus 25.2% prior. Gross borrowings rose to NZ$71.1m from NZ$61.5m, with net debt of NZ$59.1m implying roughly 3.9x EBITDA on the annualised current run-rate.

What matters

Working-capital absorption is the headline economic event

  • Trade debtors jumped 52.8% to NZ$42.8m and inventories rose 49.4% to NZ$32.7m, lifting debtor days to an unprecedented 56.4 (versus a 43.7–51.9 historical range). Inventory days at 43.1 remain within the historical range, so the receivables build is the larger driver. This matters because the company funded a chunk of its growth and AGG price recovery by extending the balance sheet, not by converting trading momentum into cash.

  • Reported earnings growth overstates the operating read. NPAT grew 50.0% but PBT was effectively flat at +0.0%; the gap is explained entirely by the effective tax rate falling 11.6 percentage points to 13.6%. PBT is therefore the cleaner measure, and on that basis the business is roughly running in place despite 18.2% top-line growth — consistent with management's commentary that margin recovery is still in progress and only began in the second quarter.

  • Leverage is moving the wrong way at the same time. Gross borrowings rose NZ$9.5m while cash fell NZ$1.7m, so the working-capital build was debt-funded. Total assets at NZ$285.7m are an unprecedented high versus a NZ$199.8m–NZ$241.2m historical range, which signals operational scale-up but also leaves less room for further working-capital absorption without renewed pressure on facility headroom.

Expectations

No forward earnings target is supplied

The seasonality shape from FY22 is unhelpful because the second half delivered NZ$-0.9m of implied NPAT against HY22's NZ$0.4m, meaning the prior second half was materially worse than the first — second-half weighting was negative, not positive. Management commentary points to annualised cost savings from New Zealand site rationalisation and continued AGG momentum, but the release does not quantify the run-rate impact for the second half.

Annualising current revenue gives NZ$276.3m, materially above FY22's NZ$236.1m, but without margin recovery and a working-capital reversal that revenue scale will not on its own restore cash generation. The next data point investors should watch is whether receivables and inventories unwind in the second half.

Quality of result

The result is low quality on a cash basis

OCF/EBITDA cash conversion of 11.7% is well below the 36.6%–81.2% historical range and the 59.6% mean, and pre-lease FCF of NZ$-3.1m is an unprecedented low versus four prior positive halves averaging NZ$5.0m. Capex was disciplined at 3.5% of revenue (down from 6.2%), so the cash shortfall is not investment-driven; it is working-capital-driven.

On the earnings line, the NPAT lift came from tax. With PBT flat and EBITDA-to-cash conversion broken, the operating durability of this print rests on whether AGG's price increases hold and New Zealand margin recovery accelerates into the second half. Until that is visible, the headline revenue acceleration is best read as a recovery in trading days and price, not as a step-up in underlying earning power.

Unresolved

Open questions

How much of the NZ$25.6m working-capital build does management expect to reverse in the second half, and what is the receivables position today?
Why did debtor days rise to 56.4, and is this a customer-mix issue, a payment-terms shift, or a collection problem?
What is current headroom under banking facilities given net debt of NZ$59.1m and the working-capital absorption?
What annualised quantum of cost savings is expected from New Zealand site rationalisation, and when do they land in the P&L?
Why did the effective tax rate fall to 13.6%, and is that level sustainable?

This briefing cannot assess covenant headroom, dividend policy, or the durability of AGG's price increases without further disclosure.

Chat

Ask about MPG HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Metro Performance Glass's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about MPG HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Metro Performance Glass's HY23 result.

How much of the NZ$25.6m working-capital build does management expect to reverse in the second half, and what is the receivables position today?Why does "Working-capital absorption is the headline economic event" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for MPG after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

1. MPG 1H23 market release

HY23 / results announcement↗

1. MPG 1H23 market release

HY23 / results release↗

2. MPG Interim Report 1H23

HY23 / financial report↗

3. 1H23 Results presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

1. MPG 1H22 Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

1. MPG 1H22 Results Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

2. MPG 1H22 Interim Report

HY22 / financial report↗

Full-year context

1. MPG FY22 results announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

1. MPG FY22 results announcement

FY22 / results release↗

4. MPG FY22 NZX Appendix 1 and unaudited financial statements

FY22 / financial report↗

Release context

Correction to FY23 Interim Report and results presentation

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 50.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 11.7% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.90x for this result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 18.2% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when MPG publishes next

Get the next Metro Performance Glass briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.