Revenue
$138.1m
+18.2% ↑ vs $116.9m
Operating cash flow fell 82% and debtor days hit an unprecedented 56.4 even as Metroglass reported its first revenue acceleration in years.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY23 vs HY22
Revenue
$138.1m
+18.2% ↑ vs $116.9m
EBITDA
$15.1m
— vs —
Net profit after tax
$0.6m
+50.0% ↑ vs $0.4m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$1.8m
-82.2% ↓ vs $9.9m
Operating profit
$5.6m
+84.4% ↑ vs $3m
Cash and cash equivalents
$12m
-12.4% ↓ vs $13.7m
Total assets
$285.7m
+18.4% ↑ vs $241.2m
What changed
That swing is the immediate cause of operating cash flow falling to NZ$1.8m from NZ$9.9m (-82.2%), and of pre-lease free cash flow turning negative at NZ$-3.1m versus the historical range of NZ$1.9m–NZ$11.4m positive.
Revenue grew 18.2% to NZ$138.1m, an unprecedented high relative to the historical pattern of negative or flat half-year growth, supported by 14% New Zealand growth (driven by additional trading days versus the prior lockdown-affected period) and 32% AGG growth (driven by price increases). PBT was flat at NZ$0.6m (+0.0%), while NPAT rose 50.0% to NZ$0.6m on a lower 13.6% effective tax rate versus 25.2% prior. Gross borrowings rose to NZ$71.1m from NZ$61.5m, with net debt of NZ$59.1m implying roughly 3.9x EBITDA on the annualised current run-rate.
What matters
Trade debtors jumped 52.8% to NZ$42.8m and inventories rose 49.4% to NZ$32.7m, lifting debtor days to an unprecedented 56.4 (versus a 43.7–51.9 historical range). Inventory days at 43.1 remain within the historical range, so the receivables build is the larger driver. This matters because the company funded a chunk of its growth and AGG price recovery by extending the balance sheet, not by converting trading momentum into cash.
Reported earnings growth overstates the operating read. NPAT grew 50.0% but PBT was effectively flat at +0.0%; the gap is explained entirely by the effective tax rate falling 11.6 percentage points to 13.6%. PBT is therefore the cleaner measure, and on that basis the business is roughly running in place despite 18.2% top-line growth — consistent with management's commentary that margin recovery is still in progress and only began in the second quarter.
Leverage is moving the wrong way at the same time. Gross borrowings rose NZ$9.5m while cash fell NZ$1.7m, so the working-capital build was debt-funded. Total assets at NZ$285.7m are an unprecedented high versus a NZ$199.8m–NZ$241.2m historical range, which signals operational scale-up but also leaves less room for further working-capital absorption without renewed pressure on facility headroom.
Expectations
The seasonality shape from FY22 is unhelpful because the second half delivered NZ$-0.9m of implied NPAT against HY22's NZ$0.4m, meaning the prior second half was materially worse than the first — second-half weighting was negative, not positive. Management commentary points to annualised cost savings from New Zealand site rationalisation and continued AGG momentum, but the release does not quantify the run-rate impact for the second half.
Annualising current revenue gives NZ$276.3m, materially above FY22's NZ$236.1m, but without margin recovery and a working-capital reversal that revenue scale will not on its own restore cash generation. The next data point investors should watch is whether receivables and inventories unwind in the second half.
Quality of result
OCF/EBITDA cash conversion of 11.7% is well below the 36.6%–81.2% historical range and the 59.6% mean, and pre-lease FCF of NZ$-3.1m is an unprecedented low versus four prior positive halves averaging NZ$5.0m. Capex was disciplined at 3.5% of revenue (down from 6.2%), so the cash shortfall is not investment-driven; it is working-capital-driven.
On the earnings line, the NPAT lift came from tax. With PBT flat and EBITDA-to-cash conversion broken, the operating durability of this print rests on whether AGG's price increases hold and New Zealand margin recovery accelerates into the second half. Until that is visible, the headline revenue acceleration is best read as a recovery in trading days and price, not as a step-up in underlying earning power.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess covenant headroom, dividend policy, or the durability of AGG's price increases without further disclosure.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Metro Performance Glass's HY23 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
1. MPG 1H23 market release
HY23 / results announcement1. MPG 1H23 market release
HY23 / results release2. MPG Interim Report 1H23
HY23 / financial report3. 1H23 Results presentation
HY23 / results presentation1. MPG 1H22 Results Announcement
HY22 / results announcement1. MPG 1H22 Results Announcement
HY22 / results release2. MPG 1H22 Interim Report
HY22 / financial report1. MPG FY22 results announcement
FY22 / results announcement1. MPG FY22 results announcement
FY22 / results release4. MPG FY22 NZX Appendix 1 and unaudited financial statements
FY22 / financial reportCorrection to FY23 Interim Report and results presentation
HY23 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 50.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 11.7% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is 3.90x for this result.
Revenue growth context
Revenue growth was 18.2% for this reporting period.
Get the next Metro Performance Glass briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.