Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Napier Port Holdings (NPH) / FY23

Cyclone hit pushes PBT down 20.2% with margin at unprecedented 18.7%

Reported NPAT fell 18.8%, but the disclosed underlying figure dropped from NZ$18.6m to NZ$10.7m while a capex pause flattered free cash flow.

Transport & Infrastructure / Ports

NPH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was $62.3m, versus $50.7m in HY22.

NPH Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was 35.1%, versus 32.4% in HY22.

NPH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY23 was $21.4m, versus $13m in HY22.

NPH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY21 NPH: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $6.8m; 3-period range $-1.9m to $4.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$3.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-1.9m.
  • HY22 NPH: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.9m; 3-period range $2.1m to $6.8m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.9m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$4.5m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY23 NPH: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $1.5m; 4-period range $0.2m to $0.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.5m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.6m, and none had a working-capital release.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$728.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

25.38x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.14

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

14.68x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

56.2x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.69x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

4.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
14 November 2023
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$118.4m

+3.4% ↑ vs $114.5m

Net profit after tax

$16.6m

-18.6% ↓ vs $20.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$37.2m

+12.7% ↑ vs $33m

Final dividend per share

3.5c

-24.5% ↓ vs 4.7c

Profit before tax

$22.1m

-20.2% ↓ vs $27.7m

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.1m

-43.2% ↓ vs $1.9m

Total assets

$564.8m

+0.4% ↑ vs $562.7m

What changed

Profit before tax fell 20.2% to NZ$22.1m and PBT margin compressed to 18.7%, which is below the historical range of 24.2%-29.1% supplied in Annolyse's historical baseline

NPAT declined 18.6% to NZ$16.6m and ROE fell to 4.2%, also outside the historical 5.2%-7.2% range. Management attributed the second-half weakness to Cyclone Gabrielle disruption.

Revenue rose 3.4% to NZ$118.4m, well below the 11.1% historical mean, with cruise revenue returning (NZ$5.3m versus NZ$0.0m) partly offsetting a NZ$2.7m decline in container services. Operating cash flow improved 12.7% to NZ$37.2m, and capex collapsed to NZ$13.8m from NZ$72.1m as the Te Whiti wharf programme rolled off, swinging pre-lease free cash flow from -NZ$39.0m to +NZ$23.5m. The final dividend was cut 24.5% to 3.55 cents per share.

What matters

The reported NPAT decline understates the operating deterioration

Management's disclosed underlying NPAT was NZ$10.7m versus NZ$18.6m a year earlier, a roughly 42% fall against the reported -18.8% headline. With PBT margin at 18.7% (an unprecedented low against the 24.2%-29.1% historical band) and ROE at 4.2% (versus the 5.2%-7.2% historical range), the read on operating earnings is materially weaker than the headline conveys. This matters because the gap signals that non-operating items have softened a year in which the core port operation actually went backwards.

Working capital tightened the screws on a soft P&L. Trade debtors rose 15.1% to NZ$11.4m, pushing receivable days to 35.3, an unprecedented high against the 28.9-31.7 historical range. The NZ$1.5m operating working-capital build is above the historical mean of NZ$0.6m and the largest absorption in the three-period baseline. The implication is that customer collection lengthened just as earnings weakened.

FCF recovery is a capex-cycle artefact, not an operating signal. Capex intensity fell from 62.9% of revenue to 11.6%, almost entirely explaining the NZ$62.5m swing in pre-lease FCF. The current NZ$23.5m print sits within the historical NZ$-68.9m to NZ$40.8m range and should not be read as a step-change in cash generation power.

Expectations

The HY23 release showed revenue up 22.8% to NZ$62.3m and underlying NPAT up 3.9%, so the full-year deterioration is concentrated in the second half, consistent with the February 2023 cyclone

The implied second-half revenue is NZ$56.1m versus NZ$62.3m in H1, and second-half NPAT of NZ$7.9m versus NZ$8.7m in H1, meaning the operating activities outcome of NZ$37.2m landed below the prior-year guidance bracket that began at NZ$42m (per the FY22 release excerpt).

Management expressed confidence in a volume bounce-back but flagged a more challenging outlook, and no quantified FY24 target is supplied in the materials. The gap between H1 momentum and H2 disruption is the central uncertainty heading into FY24.

Quality of result

The result is lower-quality than the reported NPAT line suggests

The reported figure benefits from items that do not flow through underlying NPAT, and three durability-sensitive metrics (PBT margin, NPAT margin, ROE) are all at unprecedented lows on the supplied historical baseline. Working capital absorbed NZ$1.5m against a historical mean build of NZ$0.6m, and debtor days at 35.3 sit outside historical norms, which means part of the operating cash flow improvement is being offset by slower collections.

The cash story looks stronger than the earnings story only because the Te Whiti capex cycle ended; FCF/NPAT of 141.6% is mechanical rather than structural. Net debt was essentially flat at NZ$128.9m, and the dividend at 54.5% of pre-lease FCF is covered, but the 24.5% per-share cut signals the board is rebuilding headroom rather than declaring confidence in the run-rate.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected volume trajectory and underlying earnings recovery profile for FY24 following the cyclone-affected second half?
Why have debtor days pushed to an unprecedented 35.3 days, and is this a customer-mix issue or a collection-process issue?
What is the capital allocation plan now that the Te Whiti wharf capex cycle has rolled off and intensity has fallen to 11.6% of revenue?
How should investors interpret the gap between reported NPAT of NZ$16.6m and underlying NPAT of NZ$10.7m, and which items drove it?
Will the dividend be rebuilt from the cut 3.55c base if H1 FY24 volumes confirm the bounce-back thesis?

This briefing cannot assess the cyclone insurance recovery economics, the FY24 volume trajectory, or the composition of the reported-versus-underlying NPAT bridge.

Chat

Ask about NPH FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Napier Port Holdings's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NPH FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Napier Port Holdings's FY23 result.

What is the expected volume trajectory and underlying earnings recovery profile for FY24 following the cyclone-affected second half?Why does "The reported NPAT decline understates the operating deterioration" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for NPH after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NPH - 2023 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

NPH - 2023 Annual Results Investor Presentation

FY23 / results presentation↗

NPH - 2023 NZX Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2023 Full Year Results

FY23 / media release↗

Prior comparable period

NPH - 2022 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

NPH - 2022 NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2022 Full Year Results

FY22 / media release↗

Interim context

NPH - 2023 Half Year NZX Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

NPH - 2023 Half Year Report

HY23 / financial report↗

NPH - NZX and Media Release - 2023 Half Year Results

HY23 / media release↗

Release context

NPH - Napier Port Reinstates FY23 Earnings Guidance

FY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 54.5%, with NPAT payout at n/a.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 1.6pp.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 3.4% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 4.2%, -1.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NPH publishes next

Get the next Napier Port Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.