Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
NZME (NZM) / FY25

EBITDA up 14.9% on cost cuts as revenue declined 1.3%

Cost discipline drove an $8.1m EBITDA lift and lifted free cash flow to $25.4m, with net debt nearly halved to $15.5m.

Telecommunications & Media / Media

NZM revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $341.3m, versus $163.6m in HY25.

NZM EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 18.3%, versus 11.6% in HY25.

NZM operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $50.4m, versus $15m in HY25.

NZM working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -$6.3m, versus -$6m in HY25.
Release date
24 February 2026
Published
28 May 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$341.3m

-1.3% ↓ vs $345.9m

EBITDA

$62.3m

+14.9% ↑ vs $54.2m

Net profit after tax

$13.1m

+181.9% ↑ vs −$16m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$50.4m

+33.0% ↑ vs $37.9m

Full-year dividend per share

9.0c

flat vs 9.0c

Operating profit

$25.3m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

$18.6m

+248.8% ↑ vs −$12.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$8.8m

+89.7% ↑ vs $4.6m

What changed

Operating EBITDA rose 14.9% to $62.3m on revenue that fell 1.3% to $341.3m, so the lift was margin-driven rather than volume-driven

Management attributes the gap to a 4% reduction in operating expenses on a normalised basis, alongside continued growth in OneRoof digital listings revenue (+18%).

Reported NPAT swung from a $16.0m loss to a $13.1m profit (+181.6%), and PBT swung from -$12.5m to $18.6m (+249.1%). Most of that swing reflects the absence of the FY24 intangible asset impairment that depressed the prior operating result, rather than a 30-point lift in underlying earnings power.

Cash generation strengthened materially: operating cash flow rose 33.0% to $50.4m and free cash flow more than doubled to $25.4m. Net debt fell from $24.1m to $15.5m, taking leverage to 0.25x EBITDA from 0.45x.

What matters

Cost-led EBITDA growth on a shrinking top line

EBITDA expanded $8.1m while revenue contracted by $4.6m, which means the entire EBITDA improvement and more came from cost reduction. That is a clean operating read this year, but it raises the question of how many further cost levers remain before revenue trajectory matters again.

Audio profit fell despite revenue growth. Audio revenue rose to $122.2m from $116.6m, but segment result declined to $18.1m from $21.9m. Disclosed segment margin moved to 15% from 11% on the new basis, so the absolute decline reflects a different cost allocation rather than a clean deterioration — but the headline still flags that the dominant 35.4% revenue segment did not contribute to group profit growth this year.

Cash conversion and leverage moved in the right direction. OCF/EBITDA improved to 80.8% from 69.9% and FCF/NPAT reached 194.1%, supported by a $6.3m release of operating working capital (receivable days down 2.6 to 35.6; inventory days down 3.7 to 1.7). Combined with $4.4m of borrowings reduction, this materially de-risks the balance sheet from a capacity perspective.

Expectations

No forward earnings target or quantified guidance is supplied with this release, so the result cannot be benchmarked against a stated number

Management's outlook commentary emphasises continued OneRoof digital growth, ongoing cost focus, and balance-sheet capacity for shareholder returns.

The half-year shape is informative: HY25 contributed only 38.4% of full-year EBITDA and HY25 NPAT was -$0.4m, which means the H2 implied EBITDA was $38.4m and implied NPAT $13.5m. The result is heavily second-half weighted, so anchoring next year's expectations to an annualised H2 run-rate would be more aggressive than annualising the full-year number.

Quality of result

The EBITDA and cash improvements look more durable than the NPAT swing

The NPAT recovery is dominated by the absence of FY24's intangible impairment, which is a one-time accounting reset rather than an underlying earnings step-change — PBT growth of 249.1% should be read in that light. The cleaner operating reads are the 14.9% EBITDA lift and the move in operating profit from -$5.1m to $25.3m.

Cash quality strengthened on two fronts: lower capex (down 15.7% to $10.7m, or 3.1% of revenue) and a $6.3m working-capital release. The working-capital benefit is non-repeating in nature — receivable and inventory days cannot keep falling indefinitely — so the FY26 starting point for cash conversion is likely lower than the 80.8% printed this year. Free cash flow comfortably covered the 9.0c full-year dividend (FCF payout ratio 66.6% versus 148.7% in FY24), so distribution capacity has genuinely improved even after stripping the working-capital tailwind.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the 4% normalised opex reduction is structural versus one-off, and how much further cost reduction is achievable before it constrains revenue?
Why did Audio segment result fall to $18.1m from $21.9m despite revenue growth, and is the new disclosed margin basis comparable to prior periods?
How should investors interpret the H2-weighted shape — is the HY25 weakness expected to recur in HY26, or was it driven by identifiable one-off costs?
What is the expected FY26 working-capital movement, given the $6.3m release in FY25 cannot repeat at the same scale?
Will the strengthened balance sheet (0.25x leverage, $15.5m net debt) be deployed for additional shareholder returns, M&A, or held as capacity?

This briefing cannot assess the durability of OneRoof's digital listings growth or the competitive dynamics underlying the Audio segment result decline without further segment commentary.

Chat

Ask about NZM FY25

Ask follow-up questions about NZME's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about NZM FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about NZME's FY25 result.

What share of the 4% normalised opex reduction is structural versus one-off, and how much further cost reduction is achievable before it constrains revenue?Why does "Cost-led EBITDA growth on a shrinking top line" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for NZM after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZME 2025 Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

NZME 2025 Full Year Results Announcement

FY25 / results release↗

NZME 2025 Full Year Results Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

NZME 2025 Full Year Results NZX Form

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

NZME 2024 Annual Report and Consolidated Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

NZME 2024 Full Year Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

NZME 2024 Full Year Results Investor Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

NZME 2024 Full Year Results NZX Form

FY24 / results announcement↗

Interim context

NZME 2025 Consolidated Interim Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

NZME 2025 Half Year Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

NZME 2025 Half Year Results NZX Form

HY25 / results announcement↗

NZME 2025 Half Year Year Results Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Release context

2024 Investor Day

FY24 / commentary↗

NZME FY24 guidance clarification

FY24 / commentary↗

NZME upgrades earnings guidance

FY25 / commentary↗

ASM Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 67.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 66.6%, with NPAT payout at 129.3%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 13.4%, +29.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 80.8% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +10.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when NZM publishes next

Get the next NZME briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.