Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Property for Industry (PFI) / HY21

NPAT up 1653% on $248.2m revaluation; underlying FFO up just 12.1%

Headline growth reflects fair value gains and a revenue-base shift; FFO, 22.9% NTA growth, and 30% gearing are the real operating read.

Property / Industrial property

PFI revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $73.6m, versus $127.5m in FY25.

PFI operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $28.7m, versus $60.7m in FY25.

PFI NPAT trajectory

Statutory profit after tax across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $46.9m, versus $106m in FY25.

PFI net debt

Borrowings less cash across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $765.4m, versus $702.1m in FY25.
Release date
20 August 2021
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY21 vs HY20

Revenue

$306.5m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net profit after tax

$273.5m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$40m

+216.9% ↑ vs $12.6m

Interim dividend per share

1.8c

flat vs 1.8c

Profit before tax

$286m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.3m

-59.5% ↓ vs $3.2m

Total assets

$2.1b

+35.6% ↑ vs $1.5b

What changed

Statutory earnings surged but are dominated by accounting movements rather than operating performance

NPAT rose to NZ$273.5m from NZ$15.6m (n/m) and PBT to NZ$286.0m from NZ$21.5m (n/m), with NZ$248.2m of fair value gains on investment properties doing most of the work. Management's preferred operating measure, Funds From Operations, was up 12.1%.

Reported revenue jumped 538.1% to NZ$306.5m, but the prior-comparable line was "Rental and management fee income" (NZ$48.0m) while the current line is "Total income", which includes the revaluation. The two periods are not like-for-like at the top line.

Operating cash flow tripled to NZ$40.0m from NZ$12.6m, and pre-lease free cash flow of NZ$27.7m sits above the historical baseline range (mean NZ$-3.1m). The interim dividend is flat at 1.8c per share (3.6c declared for the half).

What matters

The result is a revaluation result

  • PBT margin of 93.3% is well above the historical range (mean 32.5%), and NPAT margin of 89.2% is similarly elevated — both driven by the NZ$248.2m property uplift, not by recurring rental economics. For an industrial landlord, this matters because cap-rate-led gains do not generate distributable cash and can reverse if yields move.
  • Underlying rental performance is solid but unspectacular. FFO up 12.1%, occupancy of 99.5%, WALT of 4.79 years, and only 1.1% of contract rent expiring in H2 2021 point to a stable income engine. NTA per share rose 22.9% to NZ$2.714, which is the cleanest reflection of the revaluation in shareholder terms.
  • Balance sheet expanded with leverage. Total assets grew 35.6% to NZ$2.1b and total equity 32.6% to NZ$1.4b, but gross borrowings rose 43.4% to NZ$605.4m and net debt to roughly NZ$604.1m. Stated gearing of 30.0% remains within typical industrial-REIT comfort, supported by the Carlaw Park divestment secured at NZ$110.0m and NZ$138.3m of core industrial deployment.

Expectations

No forward earnings target was provided

The supplied shape context shows HY20 was 49.3% of FY20 revenue but only 13.8% of FY20 NPAT, because H2 FY20 captured most of last year's revaluation — so the full-year NPAT comparison will normalise once H2 FY21 lands. On a rental basis, the very low expiry exposure (1.1% of contract rent in H2 2021) and 99.5% occupancy support a steady underlying income line into H2.

The release does not quantify post-divestment redeployment timing or the cap-rate assumptions behind the revaluation, so the durability of the NZ$248.2m uplift cannot be tested from the supplied material.

Quality of result

Most of the reported earnings uplift is non-cash

The NZ$248.2m fair value gain explains the bulk of the PBT and NPAT jump, the effective tax rate dropped to 4.3% from 27.1% (consistent with most of the gain being non-taxable revaluation), and FCF-to-NPAT collapsed to 10.1% from 37.4% — a function of the inflated NPAT denominator rather than weak cash generation. Operating cash flow itself is genuinely stronger.

Payout ratio versus pre-lease FCF is 52.3% based on the source-backed deterministic derivation.

Unresolved

Open questions

What does rental and management fee income look like on a like-for-like basis, given the prior-period revenue label is not directly comparable?
What cap-rate compression drove the NZ$248.2m revaluation, and how much of it is mark-to-market versus rental-growth-led?
How will the NZ$110.0m Carlaw Park proceeds be redeployed, and over what timeframe?
Why has the strategy "refresh" been announced now, and what does it imply for the dividend trajectory and gearing band?
Will management hold gearing near 30% as further acquisitions complete, given gross borrowings rose 43.4% over the period?

This briefing cannot assess the cap-rate, valuer, and asset-level assumptions underpinning the NZ$248.2m revaluation, or the run-rate rental growth absent a comparable revenue disclosure.

Chat

Ask about PFI HY21

Ask follow-up questions about Property for Industry's HY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PFI HY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Property for Industry's HY21 result.

What does rental and management fee income look like on a like-for-like basis, given the prior-period revenue label is not directly comparable?Why does "The result is a revaluation result" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY21?What should I watch next for PFI after HY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

[1] PFI – NZX Annual Results Announcement – 6ME 30 June 2021

HY21 / results release↗

[2] PFI - NZX Form - Results Announcement - 6ME 30 June 2021

HY21 / results announcement↗

[4] PFI - NZX Interim Results Presentation - 6ME 30 June 2021

HY21 / results presentation↗

[5] PFI - NZX Interim Financial Statements - 6ME 30 June 2021

HY21 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Financial Statements

HY20 / financial report↗

Interim Results Announcement

HY20 / results release↗

NZX Form – Results Announcement

HY20 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Outcomes

HY21 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 52.3%, with NPAT payout at 3.3%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PFI publishes next

Get the next Property for Industry briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.