Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
PGG Wrightson (PGW) / FY25

EBITDA up 27% but operating cash fell 79% on working-capital build

The agri-sector earnings recovery is real at the operating line, but $23.8m of working-capital absorption pushed cash conversion to 22.1% and lifted

Primary Industries / Rural services

PGW revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $619.4m, versus $975.3m in FY25.

PGW EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 7.4%, versus 5.8% in FY25.

PGW operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$49.9m, versus $12.4m in FY25.

PGW working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $53.4m, versus $23.8m in FY25.
Release date
12 August 2025
Published
20 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$975.3m

+6.5% ↑ vs $915.9m

EBITDA

$56.1m

+27.1% ↑ vs $44.2m

Net profit after tax

$10.7m

+245.2% ↑ vs $3.1m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$12.4m

-78.5% ↓ vs $57.7m

Full-year dividend per share

6.5c

— vs —

Operating profit

$26.2m

+70.5% ↑ vs $15.4m

Profit before tax

$14m

+164.2% ↑ vs $5.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$2.6m

-31.0% ↓ vs $3.8m

What changed

Reported earnings recovered sharply against weak FY24 comparatives: revenue rose 6.5% to $975.3m, operating EBITDA grew 27.1% to $56.1m, and profit before tax rose 164.2% to $14.0m

NPAT of $10.7m (+245.2%) is flattered by the effective tax rate normalising to 23.8% from 42.5%, so PBT growth is the cleaner operating read.

Cash quality moved in the opposite direction. Operating cash flow fell 78.5% to $12.4m, and cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) dropped to 22.1% from 130.7%. Operating working capital built by $23.8m, driven by a $19.4m rise in trade debtors to $129.0m. Gross borrowings rose 40% to $88.2m, taking net debt/EBITDA to 1.52x from 1.34x.

What matters

Cash conversion is the dominant issue

Capital raise adds balance-sheet context, with NZ$100m capital raised, but borrowings and gearing are the direct leverage evidence.

OCF/EBITDA at 22.1% versus 130.7% reflects $23.8m of working-capital absorption. Debtor days extended to 48.3 from 43.6, and free cash flow pre-lease swung to -$5.0m from +$34.9m. The reported earnings recovery is therefore not yet showing up in cash, which matters because the higher receivables balance has been funded with debt rather than internally generated cash.

The second half was loss-making. HY25 delivered $16.0m of NPAT and $41.4m of EBITDA. That means the implied H2 contribution was a $5.3m net loss on $14.8m of EBITDA, even though revenue was reasonably balanced (H1 took 58.5% of the year). The FY recovery is real but is concentrated in the first half, so projecting an H1 run-rate forward would overstate the underlying earnings trajectory.

Leverage stepped up. Gross borrowings rose to $88.2m and net debt/EBITDA moved to 1.52x. The increase funded working capital rather than capex, which fell 23.7% to $17.4m (1.8% of revenue). This narrows balance-sheet headroom if receivables do not release in FY26.

Expectations

Management does not provide an FY26 target in this release, so judgement rests on what FY25 itself shows

Against the FY25 EBITDA guidance reaffirmed at HY25 ($51m), the delivered $56.1m is a modest beat. However, the very strong first-half / loss-making second-half shape means models built on H1 momentum risk overstating run-rate earnings.

The H2 swing is what matters most for setting FY26 expectations: it suggests either seasonal phasing different from FY24 or genuine softness in the back half of the year. Without forward-work disclosure or a stated FY26 target, the release does not support a clean projection of either earnings or cash conversion into next year.

Quality of result

The operating recovery looks genuine at the earnings line

PBT growth of 164.2% from a low FY24 base, combined with EBITDA margin expansion, reflects improving conditions in the agri-sector. NPAT growth of 245.2% overstates progress because the prior period carried an unusually high 42.5% effective tax rate; the 23.8% current ETR is closer to a normal run-rate, so the cleaner operating read is PBT.

Cash quality is the weak link. Working-capital absorption of $23.8m exceeded the entire year's NPAT and pushed FCF pre-lease to -$5.0m, giving FCF/NPAT of -47.2%. The full-year dividend of 6.5cps (final 4.0cps) was not covered by free cash flow on a pre-lease basis, and the cash shortfall plus higher trade debtors was funded by additional debt drawn during the year. The 46.1% NPAT payout ratio looks moderate on the income statement but understates the cash strain because reported NPAT is itself not converting to cash. On a durability read, the earnings recovery is exposed to continued agri-sector improvement and to whether H2 weakness persists, while the cash result is balance-sheet-assisted rather than self-generated.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did NPAT swing from $16.0m in H1 to an implied $5.3m loss in H2, and is the driver seasonal phasing, market softening, or one-off margin pressure?
How much of the $19.4m trade-debtor build is expected to release in early FY26, and what caused debtor days to extend by roughly five days?
How will management fund working capital and the dividend in FY26 given net debt/EBITDA at 1.52x and FCF pre-lease already negative?
Is the 23.8% effective tax rate a sustainable run-rate, or did one-off items in either year distort the year-on-year comparison?
What is the FY26 EBITDA outlook, given no explicit guidance was provided in this release?

This briefing cannot assess whether the H2 weakness reflects seasonal phasing or trend deterioration, because the release does not provide a segmental or category walk between H1 and the implied H2.

Chat

Ask about PGW FY25

Ask follow-up questions about PGG Wrightson's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PGW FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about PGG Wrightson's FY25 result.

Why did NPAT swing from $16.0m in H1 to an implied $5.3m loss in H2, and is the driver seasonal phasing, market softening, or one-off margin pressure?Why does "Cash conversion is the dominant issue" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for PGW after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

PGW Financial Statements_FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

PGW NZX Template Results Announcement FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / results announcement↗

PGW Results Announcement FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report for Financial Year to 30 June 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Sustainability Report for Financial Year to 30 June 2024

FY24 / results announcement↗

Sustainability Report for Financial Year to 30 June 2024

FY24 / results release↗

Interim context

NZX Results Announcement Format to 31 December 2024

HY25 / results announcement↗

PGW Half Year Report to 31 December 2024

HY25 / financial report↗

PGW Half Year Results Announcement to 31 December 2024

HY25 / results release↗

PGW HY Presentation to 31 December 2024

HY25 / results presentation↗

Release context

PGW Guidance Update

FY24 / commentary↗

PGW Guidance Update

FY24 / commentary↗

Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation 2024

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 22.1% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -108.6pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 81.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 46.1%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 1.52x, +0.18x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PGW publishes next

Get the next PGG Wrightson briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.