Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
PGG Wrightson (PGW) / HY26

PBT up 11.5% but net debt jumped to $170.7m as cash outflow widened

Operating cash outflow worsened 60.8% and leverage stepped to 3.7x EBITDA, yet the board raised the interim dividend 80% to 4.5cps.

Primary Industries / Rural services

PGW revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $619.4m, versus $975.3m in FY25.

PGW EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 7.4%, versus 5.8% in FY25.

PGW operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$49.9m, versus $12.4m in FY25.

PGW working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $53.4m, versus $23.8m in FY25.
Release date
24 February 2026
Published
20 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$619.4m

+8.6% ↑ vs $570.3m

EBITDA

$45.7m

+10.5% ↑ vs $41.4m

Net profit after tax

$17.3m

+8.1% ↑ vs $16m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$49.9m

-60.8% ↓ vs −$31m

Interim dividend per share

4.5c

+80.0% ↑ vs 2.5c

Profit before tax

$24.2m

+11.5% ↑ vs $21.7m

Cash and cash equivalents

$5.3m

+125.7% ↑ vs $2.4m

Total assets

$743.6m

+12.7% ↑ vs $659.8m

What changed

Reported earnings improved across every line, but the cash and balance-sheet picture deteriorated sharply

Operating revenue grew 8.6% to $619.4m, Operating EBITDA rose 10.5% to $45.7m and PBT lifted 11.5% to $24.2m. NPAT growth was thinner at 8.1% to $17.3m as the effective tax rate moved from 26.4% to 28.7%.

The first-half operating cash outflow widened from -$31.0m to -$49.9m, a 60.8% deterioration. That swing was funded on the balance sheet: gross borrowings rose 61.5% to $176.1m, net debt climbed from $106.7m to $170.7m, and net debt/EBITDA stepped from 2.6x to 3.7x. Trade debtors increased 13.3% to $355.6m and inventories rose 10.3% to $125.7m, taking operating working capital to $481.3m (+$53.4m). Despite this, the interim dividend was raised 80% to 4.5cps and FY26 Operating EBITDA guidance of around $64m was reaffirmed.

What matters

Leverage stepped up materially while earnings grew modestly

Net debt/EBITDA at 3.7x is roughly a full turn higher than the prior comparable's 2.6x, and the increase was driven by working-capital absorption rather than capex (capex actually fell to $2.3m, or 0.4% of revenue). This matters because the headline 10.5% EBITDA lift has not translated into self-funding; the business is currently more reliant on its banking lines to carry seasonal trade receivables.

Cash conversion weakened from an already-negative base. OCF/EBITDA moved from -75.0% to -109.1%, and FCF/NPAT sits at -302.2%. PGW's first half is structurally a working-capital build, but the magnitude is worse than HY25, with receivable days extending 4.4 days to 104.6. The read on reported earnings quality therefore hinges on whether the second half releases that working capital as it did in FY25.

Dividend raised 80% without H1 cash cover. The 4.5cps interim takes the NPAT payout ratio from 11.8% to 19.6%, but with H1 free cash flow at -$52.1m the distribution is not covered by current-period cash generation. The signal is one of board confidence in second-half cash recovery rather than an earnings-funded uplift.

Expectations

The reaffirmed FY26 Operating EBITDA target of around $64m implies roughly $18.3m of second-half EBITDA, against $14.8m delivered in H2 FY25

The shape sits within PGW's heavily H1-weighted seasonality (HY25 represented 73.7% of FY25 EBITDA), so the H2 step-up required is modest in absolute dollars but dependent on continued sector recovery.

The release does not provide forward-work or order-book disclosure, so the briefing relies on the reaffirmed guidance and last year's H2 cash inflow of $43.4m as the benchmarks. The gap matters because guidance achievement and dividend coverage both turn on the same H2 working-capital release.

Quality of result

The earnings progression looks broadly durable: revenue growth of 8.6% flowed to a 10.5% EBITDA improvement, and PBT growth of 11.5% indicates underlying operating leverage rather than one-off support, with no non-recurring items flagged

The NPAT-PBT growth gap of 3.4 percentage points is explained by the higher effective tax rate, not by below-the-line distortions, so PBT is the cleaner read on operating performance.

Cash quality is the weaker side of the result. The $53.4m operating-working-capital build, the 4.4-day extension in receivable days and a 0.6-day inventory-day extension all sit in front of the H2 collection cycle that historically funds dividends and deleveraging. Capex compression (-72.5% to $2.3m) flatters near-term cash optics but does not offset the working-capital draw. Segment mix shows Retail & Water margins slipped from 8.1% to 7.9% on derived figures, while Agency margins improved from 8.6% to 9.7%; the dominant segment is therefore growing revenue but giving back a small amount of margin.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the 4.4-day extension in receivable days, and is it linked to specific customer cohorts or seasonal credit terms?
Why was the interim dividend lifted 80% when H1 free cash flow was -$52.1m and gross borrowings rose 61.5%?
How much of the $67.0m increase in gross borrowings is seasonal versus a step-change in the balance-sheet footprint?
Is the FY26 ~$64m EBITDA guidance underpinned by visible H2 forward work, or by assumed sector-recovery pacing?
What is management's expected H2 working-capital release, and how does that flow to year-end net debt?

This briefing cannot assess collection risk on the $355.6m trade debtor balance or the timing certainty of the H2 working-capital release, because neither is quantified in the disclosures provided.

Chat

Ask about PGW HY26

Ask follow-up questions about PGG Wrightson's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about PGW HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about PGG Wrightson's HY26 result.

What drove the 4.4-day extension in receivable days, and is it linked to specific customer cohorts or seasonal credit terms?Why does "Leverage stepped up materially while earnings grew modestly" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for PGW after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZX Results Announcement Format to 31 December 2026

HY26 / results announcement↗

PGW Half Year Presentation to 31 December 2025

HY26 / results presentation↗

PGW Half Year Report to 31 December 2025

HY26 / financial report↗

PGW Half Year Results Announcement to 31 December 2025

HY26 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

NZX Results Announcement Format to 31 December 2024

HY25 / results announcement↗

PGW Half Year Report to 31 December 2024

HY25 / financial report↗

PGW Half Year Results Announcement to 31 December 2024

HY25 / results release↗

Full-year context

PGW Financial Statements_FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

PGW Results Announcement FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / results announcement↗

PGW Results Announcement FY to 30 June 2025

FY25 / results release↗

Release context

Annual Shareholders Meeting Presentation

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 3.73x, +1.16x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 19.6%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 3.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 8.6% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when PGW publishes next

Get the next PGG Wrightson briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.