Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Radius Residential Care (RAD) / FY25

PBT rose 191.7% to $10.5m as margins and cash conversion stepped up

Margin and cash-conversion gains look durable, but a prior-year tax distortion exaggerates the NPAT swing from a $8.5m loss to a $7.0m profit.

Healthcare / Aged care

RAD revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $200.1m, versus $100.2m in HY26.

RAD EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 RAD: Outside range low ebitda margin. 9.7%; 3-period range 12.4% to 13.7%. EBITDA margin: 9.7%, below normal range; 3-period mean 13.2%, range 12.4%-13.7%.
  • FY26 RAD: Outside range high ebitda margin. 13.7%; 3-period range 9.7% to 13.4%. EBITDA margin: 13.7%, above normal range; 3-period mean 11.8%, range 9.7%-13.4%.
EBITDA margin: 13.7%, above normal range; 3-period mean 11.8%, range 9.7%-13.4%.

RAD operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $25.1m, versus $13.3m in HY26.

RAD working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 RAD: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $4.6m; 3-period range $-1.4m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$4.6m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-0.8m.
  • FY24 RAD: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.4m; 3-period range $-0.3m to $4.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.4m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.4m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Release date
21 May 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$175.3m

+3.9% ↑ vs $168.7m

EBITDA

$23.5m

+12.3% ↑ vs $20.9m

Net profit after tax

$7m

+182.4% ↑ vs −$8.5m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$20.1m

+42.2% ↑ vs $14.1m

Full-year dividend per share

1.4c

+107.1% ↑ vs 0.7c

Profit before tax

$10.5m

+191.7% ↑ vs $3.6m

Total assets

$339.6m

+1.5% ↑ vs $334.7m

What changed

St Allisa sale is result context, with NZ$13.6m acquisition price; operating metrics remain the main read

Radius delivered EBITDA growth of 12.3% to $23.5m on revenue of $175.3m (+3.9%), and operating cash flow rose 42.2% to $20.1m. The headline NPAT swing from a $8.5m loss to a $7.0m profit looks dramatic, but the cleaner operating read is PBT, which grew 191.7% to $10.5m. The prior-period effective tax rate of 335.8% pulled FY24 NPAT into loss territory even though PBT was positive; this year's 29.4% effective rate normalises that distortion. Net debt fell roughly 8% to $67.7m, taking net debt/EBITDA to 2.9x from 3.5x. Aged care contributed roughly 93% of group revenue, with retirement village and group support each below 3%.

What matters

PBT, not NPAT, is the operating read

PBT grew 191.7% versus reported NPAT growth of 182.9%, an 8.1 percentage-point gap that reflects the prior year's anomalous tax charge. The underlying operating improvement is closer to the 12.3% EBITDA lift than the loss-to-profit headline implies, which means investors should not extrapolate triple-digit profit growth into FY26.

Cash conversion improved materially. OCF/EBITDA rose to 85.5% from 67.5%, supported by stable working capital. Operating working capital fell roughly $0.3m and receivable days tightened to 24.0 from 25.5, so margin gains converted into cash available for debt paydown and dividends rather than locking up in receivables.

Deleveraging adds financial flexibility. Net debt/EBITDA stepped down to 2.9x from 3.5x, and capex of $6.4m (3.6% of revenue) remained well within OCF. The lower leverage and stronger interest coverage create headroom for the capital-light growth strategy management is executing without forcing equity issuance.

Expectations

No FY26 revenue or earnings targets are disclosed in the supplied materials

Against the shape context, HY25 contributed only 41.1% of full-year EBITDA and 28.0% of full-year NPAT, indicating a meaningfully second-half-weighted result. Implied H2 EBITDA of $13.8m and H2 NPAT of $5.1m show that operating momentum accelerated through the year. Whether that exit run-rate is sustainable into FY26 is not addressed in the release, so forward expectations rest on continued occupancy and EBITDAR-per-bed gains rather than on disclosed guidance.

Quality of result

The result reads as largely durable rather than timing-driven

EBITDA margin expansion (roughly 13.4% versus 12.4% prior) is consistent with management's stated lift in EBITDAR per occupied bed, and the cash-conversion improvement is supported by working capital that moved slightly favourably rather than by a one-off release. FCF before lease payments of $13.7m comfortably covers the disclosed 1.45 cps full-year dividend, and the company-disclosed AFFO payout ratio of 47% leaves room for both deleveraging and selective growth.

The main quality caveat sits in the tax line. The prior comparable's 335.8% effective tax rate generated a reported loss from a positive PBT, so any framing of "loss to profit" overstates the operating turnaround. Capex rose 56.1% in absolute terms to $6.4m; it remains modest at 3.6% of revenue but is worth watching if the capital-light strategy increasingly relies on leased rather than owned beds, because the cash-conversion advantage may compress if maintenance capex normalises higher.

Unresolved

Open questions

What share of the EBITDA lift came from organic occupancy and EBITDAR-per-bed gains versus partial-period contribution from acquired operations?
Why was the FY24 effective tax rate 335.8%, and is any residual deferred-tax volatility expected to recur in FY26?
How sustainable is the implied second-half exit run-rate given seasonality in aged-care funding cycles and occupancy?
What is the ongoing maintenance capex run-rate now that gross capex has stepped up 56.1% year-on-year?
Will the AFFO-based payout policy of 47% be retained as deleveraging continues and growth investment scales?

This briefing cannot assess occupancy trajectory, government funding settings, or integration economics of recently acquired sites because none are quantified in the supplied materials.

Chat

Ask about RAD FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Radius Residential Care's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RAD FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Radius Residential Care's FY25 result.

What share of the EBITDA lift came from organic occupancy and EBITDAR-per-bed gains versus partial-period contribution from acquired operations?Why does "PBT, not NPAT, is the operating read" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for RAD after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

RAD FY25 Audited Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

RAD FY25 Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

RAD FY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

RAD FY25 NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report 2024

FY24 / financial report↗

Interim context

RAD 1H25 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

RAD 1H25 Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

RAD 1H25 Media Release

HY25 / media release↗

RAD 1H25 NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

RAD Acquires 109 Bed Care Home

FY25 / commentary↗

RAD Upgrades FY26 Outlook 13.06.25

FY25 / commentary↗

Amended Annual Meeting Results

HY25 / commentary↗

Radius Care Provides Update on 1QFY25 and Strategy at ASM

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 8.1pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 10.6%, +23.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 85.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +18.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 47.0% on an AFFO basis, with NPAT payout at 55.8%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RAD publishes next

Get the next Radius Residential Care briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.