Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Radius Residential Care (RAD) / HY26

PBT up 204% on 19% revenue growth as cash conversion lifted to 89%

A lower effective tax rate flattered NPAT, but EBITDA +41% and leverage cut to 4.3x point to genuine operating gains.

Healthcare / Aged care

RAD revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $200.1m, versus $100.2m in HY26.

RAD EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 RAD: Outside range low ebitda margin. 9.7%; 3-period range 12.4% to 13.7%. EBITDA margin: 9.7%, below normal range; 3-period mean 13.2%, range 12.4%-13.7%.
  • FY26 RAD: Outside range high ebitda margin. 13.7%; 3-period range 9.7% to 13.4%. EBITDA margin: 13.7%, above normal range; 3-period mean 11.8%, range 9.7%-13.4%.
EBITDA margin: 13.7%, above normal range; 3-period mean 11.8%, range 9.7%-13.4%.

RAD operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $25.1m, versus $13.3m in HY26.

RAD working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 RAD: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $4.6m; 3-period range $-1.4m to $0.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$4.6m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$0.1m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-0.8m.
  • FY24 RAD: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-1.4m; 3-period range $-0.3m to $4.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.4m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-1.4m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$2.3m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.3m.
Release date
19 November 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$100.2m

+19.0% ↑ vs $84.2m

EBITDA

$14.9m

+40.7% ↑ vs $10.6m

Net profit after tax

$6.3m

+215.0% ↑ vs $2m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$13.3m

+101.6% ↑ vs $6.6m

Interim dividend per share

1.0c

+53.8% ↑ vs 0.7c

Profit before tax

$8.5m

+203.6% ↑ vs $2.8m

Cash and cash equivalents

$3m

n/m ↑ vs $0.07m

Total assets

$355.9m

+7.7% ↑ vs $330.5m

What changed

Revenue rose 19.0% to $100.2m and EBITDA grew 40.7% to $14.9m, with operating leverage carrying through to PBT of $8.5m (+203.6%) and NPAT of $6.3m (+215.0%)

Underlying earnings expanded faster than revenue at every line, which means the result is one of operating leverage rather than a pure top-line story.

Operating cash flow doubled to $13.3m from $6.6m, lifting cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) to 89.3% from 62.3%. Gross borrowings fell to $66.6m from $73.3m and net debt to EBITDA improved to 4.27x from 6.91x. The interim dividend was raised to 1.0cps from 0.65cps (+53.8%).

What matters

Operating leverage is real and cash-backed

  • Revenue +19.0% produced EBITDA +40.7% and PBT +203.6%, while OCF/EBITDA stepped up from 62.3% to 89.3%. The implication is that incremental aged-care revenue is dropping through to cash, not just to accruals, which is what would be needed to sustain the deleveraging path.

  • Tax flattered NPAT; PBT is the cleaner read. The effective tax rate fell to 22.3% from 28.6%, so NPAT grew 215.0% versus PBT growth of 203.6% — a -11.4pp gap that reflects a tax benefit rather than additional operating performance. The release does not explain the rate decline, so investors should anchor on PBT when judging underlying improvement.

  • Leverage materially eased. Net debt fell to $63.7m from $73.2m and net debt to EBITDA dropped from 6.91x to 4.27x. That capacity is what enables the dividend to step up while still funding a "capital-light" growth strategy, but a starting point above 4x EBITDA is still elevated for an aged-care operator.

Expectations

No quantified FY26 target is provided

Shape context shows HY25 represented only 48% of FY25 revenue and 28% of FY25 NPAT, so the historical pattern is second-half weighted. On that pattern alone, HY26 NPAT of $6.3m already sits close to the full FY25 NPAT of $7.0m, which sets a high bar for second-half delivery before the comparison can be considered conservative.

The release leans on Underlying EBITDA and EBITDAR-per-bed disclosures, with annualised EBITDAR per bed of $29.9k, but does not separate same-store growth from acquired or reconfigured beds. That gap matters because the durability of the operating leverage thesis depends on which mix is driving it.

Quality of result

Cash quality strengthened

FCF pre-lease was $9.6m versus $3.7m in HY25, and FCF to NPAT of 151.7% indicates earnings are converting comfortably to cash even after capex of $3.7m (3.7% of revenue). Working capital was a modest drag of $0.2m and receivable days improved to 22.9 from 26.7, so the cash step-up is not an artefact of debtor compression or capex deferral.

The main quality caveat is the tax line: about 11.4 percentage points of the NPAT growth headline comes from the lower effective rate rather than operations. Beyond that, EBITDA is presented on an underlying basis (the prior period was adjusted for the sale of one care home), and the release flags non-recurring items in the reconciliation, so the like-for-like comparison rests on management's adjustments rather than reported statutory earnings. Dividend cover also improved sharply, with the NPAT payout ratio falling to 44.8% from 94.2%, leaving more retained cash to support deleveraging.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the effective tax rate down to 22.3% from 28.6%, and is the lower rate structural or one-off?
How much of the EBITDA uplift is same-store versus acquired or reconfigured beds, and what is the same-store occupancy trend?
Given HY25 was only 28% of FY25 NPAT, is the historical second-half skew expected to repeat, or has the earnings shape now flattened?
What is the target net debt to EBITDA range, and how does the capital-light growth strategy change future capex intensity above the current 3.7% of revenue?
Why does the underlying EBITDA bridge still flag non-recurring items, and what residual adjustments sit between underlying and statutory earnings?

This briefing cannot assess occupancy, bed-level pricing, or wage and government-funding assumptions underpinning the EBITDAR-per-bed disclosure.

Chat

Ask about RAD HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Radius Residential Care's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RAD HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Radius Residential Care's HY26 result.

What drove the effective tax rate down to 22.3% from 28.6%, and is the lower rate structural or one-off?Why does "Operating leverage is real and cash-backed" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for RAD after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

RAD 1H26 Interim Report

HY26 / financial report↗

RAD 1H26 Investor Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

RAD 1H26 Media Release

HY26 / media release↗

RAD 1H26 NZX Results Announcement

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

RAD 1H25 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

RAD 1H25 Media Release

HY25 / media release↗

RAD 1H25 NZX Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

RAD FY25 Audited Financial Statements

FY25 / financial report↗

RAD FY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

RAD FY25 NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

RAD Upgraded Outlook and 2025 ASM Materials

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 11.4pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 4.27x, -2.64x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 89.3% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +27.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 19.0% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RAD publishes next

Get the next Radius Residential Care briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.