Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Rakon (RAK) / FY24

PBT collapsed 99% on a 29% revenue fall as a tax credit propped up NPAT

Operating cash flow rose 60.5% but on working-capital release, while a tax benefit lifted NPAT to $4.5m well above near-zero PBT.

Technology / Electronics

RAK revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was $128m, versus $180.3m in FY23.

RAK EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was 10.5%, versus 23.4% in FY23.

RAK operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY24 was $17.8m, versus $11.1m in FY23.

RAK working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 RAK: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $33.8m; 3-period range $-18.7m to $28.4m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$33.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$26.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-18.7m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$33.8m, above normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$26.2m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-18.7m.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EPS

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
29 May 2024
Published
29 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY24 vs FY23

Revenue

$128m

-29.0% ↓ vs $180.3m

EBITDA

$13.5m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$4.5m

-80.6% ↓ vs $23.2m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$17.8m

+60.5% ↑ vs $11.1m

Declared dividend per share

0.0c

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

$2.8m

-91.6% ↓ vs $33.3m

Profit before tax

$0.3m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$17.8m

-17.9% ↓ vs $21.7m

What changed

Revenue fell 29.0% to $128.0m as the prior-year boost from one-off chip-shortage contracts rolled off and customer inventory normalisation lagged management's expectations

Profit before tax collapsed 99.0% to $0.3m, with underlying EBITDA falling from $42.2m to $13.5m and gross margin compressing 400 basis points to 45% on workforce restructuring costs.

NPAT fell a smaller 80.6% to $4.5m because tax flipped from a 26.0% effective rate in FY23 to a credit (calculated effective rate of n/m on a near-zero PBT base), so reported NPAT sits well above PBT. Operating cash flow rose 60.5% to $17.8m, but cash on hand fell to $17.8m from $21.7m and gross borrowings rose to $6.6m. No dividend was declared, against 1.5 cps prior. Space and Defence revenue grew more than 27%, lifting its share of group revenue to 28.7% from 16.0%.

What matters

The cleaner operating read is PBT, not NPAT

A near-$4m tax credit explains essentially all of NPAT, so the headline $4.5m profit overstates underlying earnings power. On a PBT basis the business barely broke even, which means full-year economics deteriorated more sharply than the NPAT line implies and ROE fell to 2.8% from 14.8%.

Operating cash flow looks strong but is balance-sheet-assisted. OCF/EBITDA of 132.1% reflects $7.7m released from trade debtors and $7.7m from inventories, not improving earnings quality. Receivable days actually rose to 97.0 from 84.5 and inventory days to 156.6 from 126.7, so the balance reductions came from a shrinking revenue base rather than tighter working-capital management; that source of cash is finite.

Segment mix is rotating but not yet offsetting. Space and Defence revenue of $36.8m (+27%) is the strategic bright spot, but Telecommunications fell to $67.0m from $100.6m and Positioning to $14.0m from $33.8m. The mix shift is real, yet the absolute scale of Telecommunications and Positioning declines is what drives the overall result.

Expectations

No forward targets or guidance are supplied

Against the HY24 shape, 1H delivered 47.9% of full-year revenue and only 11.1% of full-year NPAT, implying a markedly stronger 2H ($66.8m revenue and $4.0m NPAT). That trajectory is consistent with management's commentary about gradual customer inventory normalisation, but the release does not quantify how much further normalisation is required or when Telecommunications and Positioning demand returns.

The implication is that any read on FY25 has to be built from disclosed segment direction (Space and Defence growth, telco/positioning still working through inventory) rather than a stated target, and the 2H exit run-rate is the relevant anchor rather than the full-year average.

Quality of result

Most of the apparent positives in this result are timing-driven or non-operating

The tax credit is unexplained in the supplied excerpts and lifts NPAT well above PBT; the operating cash flow improvement comes from working-capital release on a shrinking book rather than profit-driven cash generation; and free cash flow pre-lease of $0.8m, while better than the prior $-6.2m, converts to only 17.8% of NPAT. The decision to omit the dividend (prior payout ratio 14.7% of NPAT) is consistent with management seeing the result as low-quality.

The durable elements are narrower. Capex held broadly flat at $17.0m but rose to 13.3% of revenue from 9.6%, indicating continued investment intensity through the downcycle. Space and Defence segment growth is a genuine operating positive. Net cash position remains positive at $11.2m, giving balance-sheet capacity to absorb a further low-margin year if telco demand stays soft.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the FY24 tax credit, and is any portion expected to recur in FY25?
How much further customer inventory normalisation is required before Telecommunications and Positioning revenue stabilises?
Will the working-capital release continue, or has the bulk of the inventory and debtor reduction already been taken?
What gross margin should investors expect once restructuring costs are out of the base, and when does the 45% level recover toward 49%?
Why was no dividend declared given the still-positive net cash position, and what coverage test does the board now apply?

This briefing cannot assess underlying demand trends in Telecommunications and Positioning, or the timing of any recovery, because no forward order book, customer inventory weeks, or quantitative guidance is supplied.

Chat

Ask about RAK FY24

Ask follow-up questions about Rakon's FY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RAK FY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Rakon's FY24 result.

What drove the FY24 tax credit, and is any portion expected to recur in FY25?Why does "The cleaner operating read is PBT, not NPAT" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY24?What should I watch next for RAK after FY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Rakon FY24 financial results and business update presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

Rakon FY24 Financial Statements

FY24 / financial report↗

Rakon FY24 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Rakon FY24 Results Market Release

FY24 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

RAK FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

RAK FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

RAK FY23 Results Market Release

FY23 / results release↗

Interim context

RAK HY24 Interim Report

HY24 / financial report↗

RAK Results Announcement HY2024

HY24 / results announcement↗

RAK Results Announcement HY2024

HY24 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 363.3%, with NPAT payout at 0.0%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 157 days, +30 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -29.0% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RAK publishes next

Get the next Rakon briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.