Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Rua Bioscience (RUA) / FY22

Cash falls to $1.9m as operating burn widens to $6.8m

First product sales arrived but losses widened materially, leaving only months of cash at the current operating burn rate.

Healthcare / Medicinal cannabis

RUA revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $1.3m, versus $1.9m in FY25.

RUA Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -123.8%, versus -173.6% in FY25.

RUA operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$1.5m, versus -$2.8m in FY25.

RUA working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $0.4m, versus $0.3m in FY25.
Release date
29 August 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$0.65m

+43.2% ↑ vs $0.45m

Net profit after tax

−$8.6m

+99.8% ↑ vs −$4.4b

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$6.8m

-53.9% ↓ vs −$4.4m

Operating profit

−$7.6m

+99.9% ↑ vs −$6.6b

Profit before tax

−$7.5m

+99.9% ↑ vs −$6.2b

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.9m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$33.6m

+8.8% ↑ vs $30.9m

What changed

Rua reported FY22 revenue of $0.6m (+43.2%) on the back of its first product sales, but the pre-tax loss widened 21.2% to $7.5m and the after-tax loss widened 95.5% to $8.6m

Operating cash outflow grew to $6.8m from $4.4m, and the cash balance fell to $1.9m from $3.4m. Gross borrowings were extinguished from a nominal $10,762 balance. The PBT-versus-NPAT divergence (-74.3pp) reflects the income tax line moving from a credit in FY21 to an expense in FY22, shifting the effective tax rate from -28.5% to -15.4%. Total equity declined to $24.2m from $28.8m.

What matters

Cash runway is the central issue

  • With $1.9m of cash and $6.8m of annual operating cash outflow, the business has only a few months of cash at the current burn rate before fresh capital is required. Capex was scaled back sharply to $0.4m from $1.4m (capex/revenue of 61.9% versus 310.9%), but the reduction is nowhere near enough to bridge the operating gap.

  • The tax line is distorting the NPAT read. PBT loss widened by 21.2%; NPAT loss widened by 95.5%. The cleaner operating measure is PBT this year because the deferred-tax credit that flattered FY21 has reversed into a tax expense, producing most of the divergence. Operating performance worsened, but not at the magnitude the headline NPAT figure suggests.

  • First commercial revenue is a milestone, not yet a business. $0.6m of revenue against a $7.5m pre-tax loss means commercialization is at its earliest stage. The release points to GMP supply contracting and sales/marketing relationships as forward foundations, but the scale of revenue against the cost base means investors are still underwriting a pre-revenue business model.

Expectations

No formal guidance is provided in the release

The half-year shape was unusual: HY22 revenue of $0.360m implies second-half revenue of only $0.286m, suggesting the first-half pace did not sustain. The second-half NPAT loss accelerated to roughly $6.2m from $2.5m in H1, partly because the tax-line reversal landed in H2. Second-half operating cash outflow of $3.1m was modestly better than H1's $3.7m. The release describes the result as in line with company expectations, but supplies no revenue trajectory or breakeven shape the market can underwrite for FY23.

Quality of result

Because the result is a loss, the durability question is really about cash burn rather than earnings quality

Capex intensity fell sharply (capex down 71.5%), but operating cash outflow grew because the underlying cost base is running well ahead of revenue. Free cash flow before lease payments deteriorated to -$7.2m from -$5.8m, broadly in line with the widening operating loss.

The $0.6m of first product revenue is a step in commercial validation, but at this scale it does not yet test unit economics, channel scale, or recurring demand. The balance-sheet leverage label looks technically stronger because debt was extinguished and net debt is negative, but that reflects the cash pile rather than operating improvement, and the equity buffer is being consumed at roughly $4.6m per year on a comprehensive-income basis. The tax credit that softened FY21 NPAT is not repeating, which removes a non-cash flatter from future comparisons.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the expected timing, size and form of the next capital raise given $1.9m of cash and $6.8m of annual operating outflow?
Why did the income tax line swing from a $1.8m credit to a $1.2m expense, and is the -15.4% effective rate indicative of FY23?
How does management expect FY23 revenue to scale given the second-half slowdown to roughly $0.286m?
What is the gross margin profile on first product sales, and at what revenue level does operating leverage begin to emerge?
Does the GMP supply contract translate to committed volumes and pricing that materially change the FY23 revenue trajectory?

This briefing cannot assess the probability of regulatory approvals, distribution-partner conversion, or product volume forecasts in the company's target export markets.

Chat

Ask about RUA FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Rua Bioscience's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about RUA FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Rua Bioscience's FY22 result.

What is the expected timing, size and form of the next capital raise given $1.9m of cash and $6.8m of annual operating outflow?Why does "Cash runway is the central issue" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for RUA after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

company filing

FY22 / results announcement↗

FY22 Rua Bioscience Annual Results Announcement

FY22 / results release↗

Rua Bioscience Ltd - FY22 Financial Statements

FY22 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Financial Results Announcement FY21

FY21 / results announcement↗

Rua Bioscience FY21 Annual Results Market Announcement

FY21 / results release↗

Rua Bioscience Limited FY21 Financial Statements

FY21 / financial report↗

Interim context

Results Announcement

HY22 / results announcement↗

Rua Bioscience Interim Financial Statements Market Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

Rua Bioscience Limited Interim Financial Statements - 31 December 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 74.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 43.2% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -32.6%, -12.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when RUA publishes next

Get the next Rua Bioscience briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.