Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Sanford (SAN) / FY25

PBT up 140.6% on flat revenue with gross borrowings cut to $105.0m

Operating recovery is real but NPAT growth of 223.4% is amplified by an effective tax rate that fell from 47.4% to 29.2%.

Primary Industries / Seafood

SAN metric context

Comparable chart history for this briefing.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 12 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$655.5m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EPS

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/B

0.84x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

1.4%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
18 November 2025
Published
29 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$584.1m

+0.2% ↑ vs $582.9m

Net profit after tax

$63.7m

+223.4% ↑ vs $19.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$135.3m

+85.4% ↑ vs $73m

Full-year dividend per share

10.0c

flat vs 10.0c

Operating profit

$102m

+88.5% ↑ vs $54.1m

Profit before tax

$90m

+140.6% ↑ vs $37.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$11.6m

-19.9% ↓ vs $14.5m

Total assets

$1b

-3.8% ↓ vs $1b

What changed

Profit before tax rose 140.6% to $90.0m on essentially flat revenue (+0.2% to $584.1m), while NPAT rose 223.4% to $63.7m magnified by tax normalisation as the effective tax rate fell from 47.4% to 29.2%

PBT growth is therefore the cleaner read on operating recovery. Operating cash flow climbed 85.4% to $135.3m, and gross borrowings were cut from $258.0m to $105.0m — a $153.0m reduction that materially reshapes the balance sheet. Capex was nearly halved to $23.0m (3.9% of revenue versus 7.9% prior), lifting free cash flow before leases to $112.3m. The full-year dividend was 10.0 cps, matching FY24, with a 5.0 cps fully imputed final component. The FY25 Results Presentation also notes that remaining New Zealand fishing quota carries a $377m carrying value supported by an independent valuation showing headroom over that figure.

What matters

Tax normalisation flatters the headline

PBT growth of 140.6% is the most reliable measure of operating recovery; the additional lift to 223.4% NPAT growth reflects the effective tax rate compressing 18 percentage points to a more typical 29.2%. Investors anchoring on NPAT will overstate the underlying profit step-up.

Balance sheet transformation. Gross borrowings of $105.0m against $258.0m prior, alongside a $36.4m increase in equity to $740.8m, changes Sanford's financial flexibility. ROE moved from 2.8% to 8.6%. The deleveraging was funded by stronger operating cash flow and lower capex within the period rather than by asset realisations, though the Results Presentation context includes reference to the $52.7m crayfish quota sale recorded in FY22 as prior-period balance sheet context.

Capex restraint may not be steady-state. Capex/revenue at 3.9% versus 7.9% prior represents a 49.9% absolute reduction. This amplified FCF this year but raises a sustainability question over a capital-intensive fleet, processing and aquaculture base, and may revert.

Expectations

No forward targets or quantified outlook were supplied

The first half delivered $286.0m of revenue and $34.0m of NPAT, implying second-half revenue of $298.1m on slightly lower second-half NPAT of $29.7m. The back-half NPAT step-down on marginally higher revenue suggests margin or cost pressure in H2 that the full-year headline does not surface. Without management guidance, the release supports a recovery read but does not justify extrapolating FY25's reported margin into FY26.

Quality of result

In aggregate, the result is well cash-backed: FCF before leases of $112.3m covered NPAT 176.3% and the full-year dividend roughly twelve times (FCF payout 8.3%)

Operating cash flow growth of 85.4% nevertheless lags NPAT growth of 223.4%, which is consistent with the NPAT lift being partly tax-driven rather than cash-generative. Receivable days fell from 52 to 39 — a 13-day reduction that contributed materially to the cash result and may not repeat. Inventory rose 25.9% to $92.3m, an offsetting build that bears watching. Net of these moves, operating working capital was broadly stable at around $155.0m.

The full-year dividend of 10.0 cps drives an NPAT payout ratio of 14.7% (FY24: 23.7%) and FCF payout of 8.3%, conservative coverage that prioritises further deleveraging over distribution. Segment economics underline mix risk: Wildcatch is the largest segment at 54.6% of revenue but the lowest gross margin at 16.4%, against Salmon at 39.5% and Mussels at 27.7%.

Unresolved

Open questions

Is the 29.2% effective tax rate the new baseline, or did FY25 benefit from one-off items the release does not detail?
Why did H2 NPAT step down to $29.7m from $34.0m in H1 despite slightly higher H2 revenue?
Can capex remain near 3.9% of revenue, or is FY26 spend set to revert toward the historical 6%–8% range?
Why did inventory rise 25.9% while receivables fell 24.6% — harvest timing, channel changes, or pre-positioned stock?
With NPAT roughly tripled and net debt nearly halved, what is the capital allocation framework that supports keeping the full-year dividend at 10.0 cps?

This briefing cannot assess underlying species pricing assumptions, FY26 catch or harvest volumes, or whether the Wildcatch segment's 16.4% gross margin reflects a sustainable run rate.

Chat

Ask about SAN FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Sanford's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SAN FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Sanford's FY25 result.

Is the 29.2% effective tax rate the new baseline, or did FY25 benefit from one-off items the release does not detail?Why does "Tax normalisation flatters the headline" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for SAN after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

FY25 Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

FY25 Results Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report FY24

FY24 / financial report↗

Annual Result FY24 Summary

FY24 / results release↗

Results Announcement FY24

FY24 / results announcement↗

Interim context

Interim Report HY25

HY25 / financial report↗

Media Release HY25

HY25 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY25

HY25 / results announcement↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 82.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 8.3%, with NPAT payout at 14.7%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 8.6%, +5.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 0.2% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SAN publishes next

Get the next Sanford briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.