Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Scales Corporation (SCL) / FY22

Revenue up 20.3% but NPAT fell 27.9% on horticulture margin collapse

Logistics expansion drove the top line while China lockdowns crushed apple realisations, with minority-interest growth deepening the gap between PBT

Primary Industries / Horticulture and food

SCL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $619.2m, versus $514.6m in FY21.

SCL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was 11.1%, versus 13.9% in FY21.

SCL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $44.9m, versus $39.8m in FY21.

SCL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was $25.2m, versus $6.3m in HY22.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$845.3m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

8.37x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.69

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

0.04x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

5.47x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

11.29x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

1.85x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

3.5%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
23 February 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$619.2m

+20.3% ↑ vs $514.6m

EBITDA

$68.5m

-4.3% ↓ vs $71.6m

Net profit after tax

$19.4m

-27.9% ↓ vs $26.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$44.9m

+12.6% ↑ vs $39.8m

Final dividend per share

3.5c

-63.2% ↓ vs 9.5c

Cash and cash equivalents

$68.1m

+92.5% ↑ vs $35.4m

Total assets

$580.5m

-0.7% ↓ vs $584.8m

What changed

Revenue rose 20.3% to NZ$619.2m, yet EBITDA fell 4.3% to NZ$68.5m, PBT slipped 6.0% to NZ$45.6m and NPAT attributable to shareholders dropped 27.9% to NZ$19.4m

The top-line growth came almost entirely from Logistics, where segment revenue jumped from NZ$51.7m to NZ$123.3m (a 9.85pp lift in revenue share to 19.9%). Horticulture revenue fell to NZ$228.9m from NZ$243.4m and its segment result dropped to NZ$17.0m from NZ$20.7m on a 7.4% margin, reflecting Chinese lockdowns hitting apple price realisations during critical sales windows.

Operating cash flow lifted 12.6% to NZ$44.9m and the group ended the year in a NZ$27.0m net cash position (versus NZ$2.9m net debt), supported by NZ$68.1m of cash. The final dividend was cut to 3.5cps (the second instalment of the FY22 total) from 9.5cps in the prior year.

What matters

Segment mix degraded earnings quality

Headline revenue growth masks the fact that the higher-margin Horticulture business shrank while lower-margin Logistics (5.3% segment margin) more than doubled. Group PBT margin compressed to 7.4%, which sits at the lower edge of Annolyse's historical baseline (mean 10.0%, range 5.3%–15.0%). This matters because the top-line story is mix-driven, not operationally broad-based.

The PBT-to-NPAT gap is not a tax story. PBT fell 6.0% but NPAT fell 27.9%, a 21.9pp gap. The effective tax rate on group PBT actually declined to 16.2% from 23.9%, which sits within the historical range (mean 18.0%). The driver is non-controlling interest growth from Fern Ridge, Shelby and Fayman, which absorbed a larger share of profit and is not explained quantitatively in the supplied materials.

Balance sheet strengthened into a cyclical downturn. Net debt/EBITDA at -0.39x sits below the supplied historical range (mean 0.11x, prior 0.04x), giving the group meaningful flexibility to absorb the disclosed Cyclone Gabrielle impact in FY23. This matters because trading earnings are visibly under pressure.

Expectations

No quantitative FY23 guidance is provided, and management explicitly flag Cyclone Gabrielle as a forward issue without quantifying it

The supplied first-half context shows the result was front-loaded: 1H22 carried 82.3% of full-year EBITDA and 134.2% of full-year NPAT, implying a second-half EBITDA of NZ$12.1m and an NPAT loss of NZ$6.6m. The second-half deterioration in apples, combined with cyclone exposure to Hawke's Bay orchards, makes the FY23 starting point materially weaker than the headline FY22 numbers suggest.

Quality of result

The result is lower-quality than the revenue line implies

Cash conversion of 65.5% improved on the prior 55.6% but remains within Annolyse's recent normal range (mean 85.8%, range 55.6%–120.5%), so the OCF lift is not a structural step-up. A NZ$25.2m operating working-capital build sits within the supplied historical range but is driven by trade debtors +51.1% to NZ$36.2m and inventory +43.9% to NZ$42.6m, which extended debtor days to 21.3 (from 17.0) and inventory days to 25.1 (from 21.0).

Pre-lease FCF of NZ$30.3m comfortably covered the cash dividend (FCF payout 16.4%), but the figure sits at the lower edge of the historical range (mean NZ$47.3m). ROE compressed to 5.0% from 6.9% and is below the historical baseline (mean 9.7%), so the durable read on earnings power is weaker than the cash position implies. The dividend reduction is consistent with managing payout against an under-earning year rather than a defensive cash decision.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did non-controlling interest absorption rise so sharply, and which JV partner accounted for most of the increase?
How much of the Horticulture downturn is China-cycle versus structural pricing pressure on apple varietals?
What quantum of FY23 EBITDA impact is now expected from Cyclone Gabrielle, and what is the insurance recovery profile?
Are Logistics margins (5.3%) representative of a steady state, or do they reflect transitional freight-market dynamics that will normalise?
Whether the segmental realignment (Food Ingredients into Global Proteins) is fully like-for-like or whether prior-period comparatives have been restated.

This briefing cannot assess the standalone valuation impact of the cyclone or the recoverable amount of any damaged orchard or inventory assets, which are not quantified in the supplied disclosures.

Chat

Ask about SCL FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Scales Corporation's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SCL FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Scales Corporation's FY22 result.

Why did non-controlling interest absorption rise so sharply, and which JV partner accounted for most of the increase?Why does "Segment mix degraded earnings quality" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for SCL after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Financial Statements - 31 December 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Annual Results Announcement - 31 December 2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Annual Results Media Release - 31 December 2022

FY22 / media release↗

Annual Results Presentation - 31 December 2022

FY22 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Financial Statements - 31 December 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

Annual Results Announcement - 31 December 2021

FY21 / results announcement↗

Annual Results Media Release - 31 December 2021

FY21 / media release↗

Interim context

Financial Statements - 30 June 2022

HY22 / financial report↗

Interim Results Announcement - 30 June 2022

HY22 / results announcement↗

Interim Results Media Release - 30 June 2022

HY22 / media release↗

Release context

Market Update - Impact of Cyclone Gabrielle

FY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 21.9pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 65.5% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +9.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 20.3% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 88.7%, with NPAT payout at 25.5%.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SCL publishes next

Get the next Scales Corporation briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.