Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Scott Technology (SCT) / FY22

PBT up 24.2% but cash conversion fell to 26.4% on working-capital build

Continuing operations strengthened, yet operating cash flow fell 53% and a $12.6m discontinued-operation loss wiped headline NPAT to near zero.

Industrials / Automation and robotics

SCT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $128.2m, versus $275.3m in FY25.

SCT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 10.2%; 4-period range 10.8% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 10.2%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.1%, range 10.8%-11.5%.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 11.8%; 4-period range 10% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 11.8%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 10.5%, range 10.0%-11.5%.
  • HY25 SCT: Outside range low ebitda margin. 10%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.8%. EBITDA margin: 10.0%, below normal range; 4-period mean 10.9%, range 10.2%-11.8%.
  • FY25 SCT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 11.5%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.3%. EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.
EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.

SCT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.1m, versus $22.3m in FY25.

SCT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $6.3m; 4-period range $7.2m to $18.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.3m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 SCT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-4.9m; 4-period range $4.6m to $25.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.9m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $25.9m; 4-period range $-4.9m to $14.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$25.9m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
  • FY25 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $18.1m; 4-period range $6.3m to $10.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
18 October 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$221.8m

+2.6% ↑ vs $216.2m

EBITDA

$23.9m

+8.2% ↑ vs $22.1m

Net profit after tax

$0.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$6.3m

-53.0% ↓ vs $13.4m

Full-year dividend per share

8.0c

+33.3% ↑ vs 6.0c

Profit before tax

$14.9m

+24.2% ↑ vs $12m

Cash and cash equivalents

$8.5m

-30.7% ↓ vs $12.2m

Total assets

$206.9m

+6.4% ↑ vs $194.5m

What changed

Revenue rose 2.6% to $221.8m and EBITDA grew 8.2% to $23.9m, with gross margin firming roughly 100bps to about 24%

Profit before tax climbed 24.2% to $14.9m, with the release citing 51% growth in continuing-operations NPAT to $12.7m. Reported NPAT, however, fell to $0.09m after a $12.6m post-tax loss on a discontinued operation almost exactly offset the continuing-operations result.

Cash generation moved the other way. Operating cash flow dropped to $6.3m from $13.4m, taking cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) from 60.7% to 26.4%. Trade debtors rose 45.5% to $40.0m and inventories rose 35.5% to $31.3m, lifting operating working capital by $10.7m. Capex roughly doubled to $8.9m (4.0% of revenue), pushing FCF pre-lease to -$2.6m. Net debt moved to $8.0m from a small net cash position. The full-year dividend was 8.0 cents (FY21: 6.0 cents), with a 4.0-cent final declared.

What matters

Cash conversion deteriorated sharply against the project-industrial backdrop

  • OCF/EBITDA fell from 60.7% to 26.4% because receivable days extended from 46.4 to 65.8 and inventory days from 39.0 to 51.6. In a contract-driven business, that combination points to slower customer sign-off and pre-build for backlog, which means reported EBITDA growth has not yet translated into cash and leaves execution risk if delivery timing slips again.
  • Headline NPAT is not the operating read. PBT growth of 24.2% and continuing-operations NPAT of $12.7m show the underlying business strengthened, while the $12.6m discontinued-operation loss accounts for essentially all of the NPAT compression. This matters because the surface 99% NPAT decline overstates the operating change; the relevant questions are about what was disposed and whether further drag remains.
  • Capital intensity stepped up while cash inflow shrank. Capex of $8.9m versus $4.5m drove FCF pre-lease negative, and the move to $8.0m net debt funds both the working-capital build and a larger development asset. The 8.0c full-year dividend therefore relies on the balance sheet rather than current cash generation.

Expectations

No forward targets, forward-work value, or FY23 guidance is supplied in this release, so the result cannot be benchmarked against a stated plan

The supplied HY22 context shows revenue was modestly first-half weighted (HY22 was 53.4% of full-year revenue) and EBITDA was almost evenly split, but NPAT swung negative in the second half because the discontinued-operation loss was absorbed there.

The relevant gap is between continuing-operations earnings momentum and the cash and capex trajectory: the release supports a continuing-operations growth story but does not quantify when working-capital absorption normalises or how large the development-asset spend remains in FY23.

Quality of result

The continuing-operations PBT growth looks operationally driven: revenue, gross margin, and EBITDA all improved, and the current effective tax rate of 15.2% is not flattering reported PBT versus the -20.6% prior-year credit

To that extent, the operating read is durable.

The cash picture is weaker than reported earnings imply. EBITDA of $23.9m converted to only $6.3m of operating cash, with the $10.7m working-capital build accounting for most of the gap. Capex nearly doubled to 4.0% of revenue, taking FCF pre-lease to -$2.6m versus +$8.9m, and the 8.0c full-year dividend is not covered by current-year free cash flow. Headline ROE fell to 0.1% from 9.8%, but that is mechanically driven by the discontinued-operation loss and is not a clean read on operating returns. Net debt of $8.0m at 0.3x EBITDA is still modest, so the balance sheet absorbs this year's funding mix, but a repeat of the working-capital absorption alongside elevated capex would compress that headroom quickly.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the $12.6m discontinued-operation loss, and is any residual exit cost or contingent exposure still to flow through FY23?
Why did receivable days extend to 65.8 and inventory days to 51.6, and how much of the $10.7m working-capital build is expected to reverse on contract completions?
Is the FY22 capex run-rate, including the $6.6m development-asset purchase, the new baseline or a one-off step-up?
How is the 8.0c full-year dividend reconciled with negative free cash flow and the move into net debt?
What is current forward work and what gross-margin mix does it imply for the dominant Materials Handling & Logistics segment, given its disclosed 20% gross margin versus 40% in Mining and 32% in Meat?

This briefing cannot assess management's internal forward-order book, segment-level profitability, or the specific entity and terms of the discontinued operation, as those details are not in the supplied data.

Chat

Ask about SCT FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Scott Technology's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SCT FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Scott Technology's FY22 result.

What drove the $12.6m discontinued-operation loss, and is any residual exit cost or contingent exposure still to flow through FY23?Why does "Cash conversion deteriorated sharply against the project-industrial backdrop" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for SCT after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

Scott 2022 Full Year Investor Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Scott Announces FY22 Results

FY22 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

NZX Results Announcement

FY21 / results announcement↗

Scott 2021 Full Year Investor Presentation

FY21 / results presentation↗

Scott Announces FY21 Results

FY21 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

Interim context

2022 Half Year Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

2022 Half Year Investor Presentation

HY22 / results presentation↗

2022 Half Year Results Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

company filing

HY22 / results announcement↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Results 2021

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 26.4% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -34.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 52 days, +13 days versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 50.3%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.30x, +0.40x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SCT publishes next

Get the next Scott Technology briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.