Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Scott Technology (SCT) / FY23

Revenue +20.6% drives PBT +28.9% as net debt clears and margins expand

Strong full-year cash conversion masks a second-half operating cash outflow as contract assets and inventory built.

Industrials / Automation and robotics

SCT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $128.2m, versus $275.3m in FY25.

SCT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 10.2%; 4-period range 10.8% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 10.2%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.1%, range 10.8%-11.5%.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 11.8%; 4-period range 10% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 11.8%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 10.5%, range 10.0%-11.5%.
  • HY25 SCT: Outside range low ebitda margin. 10%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.8%. EBITDA margin: 10.0%, below normal range; 4-period mean 10.9%, range 10.2%-11.8%.
  • FY25 SCT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 11.5%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.3%. EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.
EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.

SCT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.1m, versus $22.3m in FY25.

SCT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $6.3m; 4-period range $7.2m to $18.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.3m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 SCT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-4.9m; 4-period range $4.6m to $25.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.9m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $25.9m; 4-period range $-4.9m to $14.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$25.9m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
  • FY25 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $18.1m; 4-period range $6.3m to $10.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
18 October 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$267.5m

+20.6% ↑ vs $221.8m

EBITDA

$30.4m

+27.0% ↑ vs $23.9m

Net profit after tax

$15.4m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$20.2m

+220.5% ↑ vs $6.3m

Full-year dividend per share

8.0c

flat vs 8.0c

Profit before tax

$19.2m

+28.9% ↑ vs $14.9m

Cash and cash equivalents

$21.4m

+152.8% ↑ vs $8.5m

Total assets

$253.1m

+22.3% ↑ vs $206.9m

What changed

Scott Technology's FY23 revenue rose 20.6% to NZ$267.5m, an unprecedented step-up against the company's historical baseline (mean 5.4%, prior peak 16.2%), and the 300bps gross-margin lift to 27% delivered disproportionate operating leverage

EBITDA rose 27% to NZ$30.4m and profit before tax rose 28.9% to NZ$19.2m. Reported NPAT of NZ$15.4m versus a prior NZ$0.1m is distorted by the prior comparable's NZ$12.6m loss from a discontinued operation; on a continuing-operations basis the underlying after-tax uplift is closer to ~22%. Operating cash flow of NZ$20.2m versus NZ$6.3m took the group from NZ$8.0m of net debt to roughly zero net debt. The declared final dividend is 4.0 cents, leaving the full-year payout at 8.0 cents, unchanged year on year.

What matters

Mix shift inside the core sectors

MHL revenue grew to NZ$94.4m (share to 35.3% from 31.6%) with disclosed gross margin expanding to 23% from 20%, and Protein revenue grew to NZ$76.0m at 33% gross margin. Minerals revenue fell to NZ$41.2m (share collapsing from 25.6% to 15.4%) despite holding a 40% gross margin, the highest disclosed segment margin. That a 10.2pp negative mix shift away from the highest-margin segment still coincided with a 300bps blended margin gain implies real execution gains in MHL and Protein, but whether FY23's margin level repeats depends on Minerals stabilising.

Forward work gives partial cover. Disclosed forward work of NZ$195m equates to ~72.9% of FY23 revenue. This is meaningful visibility into FY24 trading but leaves a sizeable book-to-fill gap, particularly given the Minerals reversal.

Balance-sheet repair is real but contract balances ballooned. Net debt/EBITDA at effectively 0.00x sits at the lower edge of the company's historical range (mean 0.33x), and ROE lifted to 13.5%, above the historical range (mean 7.0%). However, contract liabilities rose 73% to NZ$45.5m and contract assets rose 90% to NZ$34.2m, indicating that the order book absorbed and recycled significant working capital during the year.

Expectations

No explicit FY24 revenue, margin or cash targets are disclosed

Management cites continued execution of the 2025 strategy with NZ$195m of forward work and stated strength in protein and materials handling. The HY23 shape shows H1 carried 47.3% of FY23 revenue and 47.9% of EBITDA, so the trading shape was modestly second-half weighted on earnings. The read for FY24 therefore rests on translating the forward book into delivered revenue without further working-capital absorption, with Minerals being the single largest swing factor on group gross margin given its disclosed 40% margin and shrinking share.

Quality of result

The operating earnings result is high quality on the headline measures

PBT growth of 28.9% is the cleanest cross-period read because reported NPAT is flattered by the absence of the prior discontinued-operation loss and the effective tax rate moved from 15.2% to 19.6%. The gross-margin gain, EBITDA growth of 27% and ROE step-up confirm a genuine underlying trading uplift, not a tax or accounting effect.

Cash quality is more mixed. Full-year OCF/EBITDA of 66.6% sits at the upper edge of the company's historical range (mean 44.4%), and pre-lease FCF of NZ$14.7m converted to ~95.0% of NPAT. But with HY23 operating cash flow disclosed at NZ$26.0m, the full-year NZ$20.2m implies an H2 operating cash outflow of roughly NZ$5.8m alongside the 90% rise in contract assets. Operating working-capital movement of NZ$7.6m is within the company's historical range (NZ$6.3m–NZ$18.1m), so the build is not abnormal in size, but inventory days at 52.2 sit just above the historical mean of 47.7. Capex at 2.1% of revenue is also notably below the prior 4.0%, which flatters pre-lease FCF.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the implied H2 operating cash outflow of roughly NZ$5.8m when H1 generated NZ$26.0m, and which segments absorbed that cash?
Why did Minerals revenue fall to NZ$41.2m when its 40% gross margin is the highest disclosed, and what is the FY24 trajectory for that segment?
How much of the 300bps blended gross-margin gain reflects durable pricing and mix versus project-timing benefits inside MHL and Protein?
Will the 73% rise in contract liabilities convert smoothly to FY24 revenue, or does it embed execution and delivery risk?
Why is capex tracking at 2.1% of revenue versus 4.0% prior — is this a timing deferral or a permanent step-down in investment intensity?

This briefing cannot assess management's specific FY24 revenue, margin or cash conversion targets because none are disclosed in the release.

Chat

Ask about SCT FY23

Ask follow-up questions about Scott Technology's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SCT FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Scott Technology's FY23 result.

What drove the implied H2 operating cash outflow of roughly NZ$5.8m when H1 generated NZ$26.0m, and which segments absorbed that cash?Why does "Mix shift inside the core sectors" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for SCT after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZX Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

Scott 2023 Full Year Investor Presentation

FY23 / results presentation↗

Scott Announces FY23 Results

FY23 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

Scott 2022 Full Year Investor Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Scott Announces FY22 Results

FY22 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Interim context

2023 Half Year Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

2023 Half Year Investor Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

2023 Half Year Results Announcement

HY23 / results release↗

company filing

HY23 / results announcement↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Results 2022

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 66.6% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +40.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 20.6% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 41.5%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -0.00x, -0.34x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SCT publishes next

Get the next Scott Technology briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.