Revenue
$126.5m
+6.9% ↑ vs $118.4m
Margins reached an unprecedented 7.7% but the OCF swing leans on a working-capital release that breaks a three-period pattern of builds.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
HY23 vs HY22
Revenue
$126.5m
+6.9% ↑ vs $118.4m
EBITDA
$14.6m
+19.7% ↑ vs $12.2m
Net profit after tax
$7.9m
+68.1% ↑ vs $4.7m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$26m
+394.4% ↑ vs −$8.8m
Interim dividend per share
4.0c
flat vs 4.0c
Profit before tax
$9.7m
+31.1% ↑ vs $7.4m
Cash and cash equivalents
$30m
+117.9% ↑ vs $13.7m
Total assets
$241.6m
+14.6% ↑ vs $210.8m
What changed
That swing drove operating cash flow from NZ$-8.8m to NZ$26.0m and lifted OCF/EBITDA cash conversion to 178.8%, which means the standout cash result rests on a pattern break rather than recurring trading dynamics.
Underneath that, the operating read is genuinely stronger. Revenue grew 6.9% to NZ$126.5m, EBITDA rose 19.7% to NZ$14.6m, and PBT grew 31.1% to NZ$9.7m at a 7.7% PBT margin — the highest in the supplied historical baseline (mean 4.8%). Reported NPAT was up 68.1% but the effective tax rate fell from 36.2% to 19.3%, so PBT growth is the cleaner operating read.
Net debt moved from +NZ$12.9m to -NZ$12.8m as cash more than doubled to NZ$30.0m and gross borrowings fell NZ$9.5m.
What matters
A NZ$4.9m release versus an average NZ$10.1m build across three prior periods — none of which showed a release — drives the entire OCF swing and the NZ$24.5m of pre-lease free cash flow, itself flagged as unprecedented against a four-period mean of NZ$-1.4m. Cash quality reverses if working capital normalises, even with EBITDA holding up.
Margin expansion looks more durable than the cash result. Group gross margin rose from 22% to 26% and PBT margin reached 7.7% (against a historical range of 4.1% to 6.3%), with Mining at 46% gross margin and Meat at 36%. The three core sectors delivered 77% of group revenue, suggesting the lift reflects mix and execution rather than one-off contract effects.
Leverage has flipped from net debt to net cash, expanding capital flexibility. Net debt/EBITDA at -0.88x is the lowest in the supplied historical baseline (mean 1.10x). With the dividend held flat at 4.0 cps and the payout ratio at 40.8% (versus a historical mean of 72.5%), Scott retains capacity to fund Scott 2025 investment or absorb a working-capital reversal without straining the balance sheet.
Expectations
The FY22 shape shows HY22 was 53.4% of full-year revenue and 50.8% of EBITDA, suggesting no meaningful second-half weighting. Annualising HY23 revenue implies roughly NZ$253m. The FY22 anchor includes a discontinued operation that pulled total NPAT to NZ$0.09m against continuing-operations NPAT of NZ$12.7m, so HY23-versus-FY22-total NPAT comparisons are invalid; continuing operations is the only fair reference.
What this release does not support is any conclusion about whether the working-capital release will reverse, the path of the effective tax rate after its drop from 36.2% to 19.3%, or the dollar value of forward work.
Quality of result
Margin expansion is broad-based, with Mining at 46% and Meat at 36% gross margin, and PBT margin of 7.7% sits clearly outside the prior historical range (4.1% to 6.3%). Capex at 1.2% of revenue indicates the result was not balance-sheet-assisted through deferred investment.
Three parts are timing- or balance-sheet-driven. First, the NZ$4.9m working-capital release is outside the historical range of builds and is the main driver of FCF/NPAT of 311.4%. Second, the effective tax rate of 19.3% (versus 36.2% prior) accounts for the -37.0pp gap between 31.1% PBT growth and 68.1% NPAT growth; a normalisation would compress NPAT growth materially. Third, ROE of 14.9% benefits from the same tailwinds, so the through-cycle level is likely lower.
The earnings improvement looks more sustainable than the cash improvement: PBT margin expansion is the underlying story, while the cash result is amplified by working-capital and tax tailwinds that the historical baseline flags as outside normal patterns.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess forward work, project-by-project margins, or any quantitative target underpinning the Scott 2025 strategy.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Scott Technology's HY23 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
2023 Half Year Financial Statements
HY23 / financial report2023 Half Year Investor Presentation
HY23 / results presentation2023 Half Year Results Announcement
HY23 / results releasecompany filing
HY23 / results announcement2022 Half Year Financial Statements
HY22 / financial report2022 Half Year Results Announcement
HY22 / results releasecompany filing
HY22 / results announcementNZX Results Announcement
FY22 / results announcementNZX Results Announcement
FY22 / results releaseScott Annual Report 2022
FY22 / financial reportAnnual Meeting Results 2022
HY23 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 37.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 178.8% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +251.5pp versus the prior comparable period.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Dividend payout versus NPAT is 40.8%.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is -0.88x, -1.94x versus the prior comparable period.
Get the next Scott Technology briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.