Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Scott Technology (SCT) / HY23

PBT up 31.1% on margin highs, but working-capital release flatters cash

Margins reached an unprecedented 7.7% but the OCF swing leans on a working-capital release that breaks a three-period pattern of builds.

Industrials / Automation and robotics

SCT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $128.2m, versus $275.3m in FY25.

SCT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 10.2%; 4-period range 10.8% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 10.2%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.1%, range 10.8%-11.5%.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 11.8%; 4-period range 10% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 11.8%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 10.5%, range 10.0%-11.5%.
  • HY25 SCT: Outside range low ebitda margin. 10%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.8%. EBITDA margin: 10.0%, below normal range; 4-period mean 10.9%, range 10.2%-11.8%.
  • FY25 SCT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 11.5%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.3%. EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.
EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.

SCT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.1m, versus $22.3m in FY25.

SCT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $6.3m; 4-period range $7.2m to $18.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.3m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 SCT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-4.9m; 4-period range $4.6m to $25.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.9m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $25.9m; 4-period range $-4.9m to $14.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$25.9m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
  • FY25 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $18.1m; 4-period range $6.3m to $10.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
12 April 2023
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$126.5m

+6.9% ↑ vs $118.4m

EBITDA

$14.6m

+19.7% ↑ vs $12.2m

Net profit after tax

$7.9m

+68.1% ↑ vs $4.7m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$26m

+394.4% ↑ vs −$8.8m

Interim dividend per share

4.0c

flat vs 4.0c

Profit before tax

$9.7m

+31.1% ↑ vs $7.4m

Cash and cash equivalents

$30m

+117.9% ↑ vs $13.7m

Total assets

$241.6m

+14.6% ↑ vs $210.8m

What changed

Scott Technology's HY23 result is dominated by a NZ$4.9m operating working-capital release, against a historical pattern of builds averaging NZ$10.1m across each of the prior three comparable periods, none of which showed a release

That swing drove operating cash flow from NZ$-8.8m to NZ$26.0m and lifted OCF/EBITDA cash conversion to 178.8%, which means the standout cash result rests on a pattern break rather than recurring trading dynamics.

Underneath that, the operating read is genuinely stronger. Revenue grew 6.9% to NZ$126.5m, EBITDA rose 19.7% to NZ$14.6m, and PBT grew 31.1% to NZ$9.7m at a 7.7% PBT margin — the highest in the supplied historical baseline (mean 4.8%). Reported NPAT was up 68.1% but the effective tax rate fell from 36.2% to 19.3%, so PBT growth is the cleaner operating read.

Net debt moved from +NZ$12.9m to -NZ$12.8m as cash more than doubled to NZ$30.0m and gross borrowings fell NZ$9.5m.

What matters

Working-capital release is unprecedented and likely partly reversible

A NZ$4.9m release versus an average NZ$10.1m build across three prior periods — none of which showed a release — drives the entire OCF swing and the NZ$24.5m of pre-lease free cash flow, itself flagged as unprecedented against a four-period mean of NZ$-1.4m. Cash quality reverses if working capital normalises, even with EBITDA holding up.

Margin expansion looks more durable than the cash result. Group gross margin rose from 22% to 26% and PBT margin reached 7.7% (against a historical range of 4.1% to 6.3%), with Mining at 46% gross margin and Meat at 36%. The three core sectors delivered 77% of group revenue, suggesting the lift reflects mix and execution rather than one-off contract effects.

Leverage has flipped from net debt to net cash, expanding capital flexibility. Net debt/EBITDA at -0.88x is the lowest in the supplied historical baseline (mean 1.10x). With the dividend held flat at 4.0 cps and the payout ratio at 40.8% (versus a historical mean of 72.5%), Scott retains capacity to fund Scott 2025 investment or absorb a working-capital reversal without straining the balance sheet.

Expectations

No quantitative forward targets were disclosed beyond a generic reference to the Engineering Scott to High Performance 2025 strategy, so the result has to be judged on its own footing

The FY22 shape shows HY22 was 53.4% of full-year revenue and 50.8% of EBITDA, suggesting no meaningful second-half weighting. Annualising HY23 revenue implies roughly NZ$253m. The FY22 anchor includes a discontinued operation that pulled total NPAT to NZ$0.09m against continuing-operations NPAT of NZ$12.7m, so HY23-versus-FY22-total NPAT comparisons are invalid; continuing operations is the only fair reference.

What this release does not support is any conclusion about whether the working-capital release will reverse, the path of the effective tax rate after its drop from 36.2% to 19.3%, or the dollar value of forward work.

Quality of result

Two parts look durable

Margin expansion is broad-based, with Mining at 46% and Meat at 36% gross margin, and PBT margin of 7.7% sits clearly outside the prior historical range (4.1% to 6.3%). Capex at 1.2% of revenue indicates the result was not balance-sheet-assisted through deferred investment.

Three parts are timing- or balance-sheet-driven. First, the NZ$4.9m working-capital release is outside the historical range of builds and is the main driver of FCF/NPAT of 311.4%. Second, the effective tax rate of 19.3% (versus 36.2% prior) accounts for the -37.0pp gap between 31.1% PBT growth and 68.1% NPAT growth; a normalisation would compress NPAT growth materially. Third, ROE of 14.9% benefits from the same tailwinds, so the through-cycle level is likely lower.

The earnings improvement looks more sustainable than the cash improvement: PBT margin expansion is the underlying story, while the cash result is amplified by working-capital and tax tailwinds that the historical baseline flags as outside normal patterns.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the NZ$4.9m working-capital release against a historical pattern of NZ$10.1m builds, and how much should be assumed to reverse in H2?
Why did the effective tax rate fall from 36.2% to 19.3%, and what is the steady-state rate for FY23?
What is the dollar value of forward work, and how is it split across Meat, MHL, Mining and Rest of Business?
Will the net cash position support M&A under Scott 2025, or is a capital-return signal more likely given the 40.8% payout?
How are inflation and supply-chain pressures flowing through pricing on contracts yet to be delivered?

This briefing cannot assess forward work, project-by-project margins, or any quantitative target underpinning the Scott 2025 strategy.

Chat

Ask about SCT HY23

Ask follow-up questions about Scott Technology's HY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SCT HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Scott Technology's HY23 result.

What drove the NZ$4.9m working-capital release against a historical pattern of NZ$10.1m builds, and how much should be assumed to reverse in H2?Why does "Working-capital release is unprecedented and likely partly reversible" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for SCT after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

2023 Half Year Financial Statements

HY23 / financial report↗

2023 Half Year Investor Presentation

HY23 / results presentation↗

2023 Half Year Results Announcement

HY23 / results release↗

company filing

HY23 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

2022 Half Year Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

2022 Half Year Results Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

company filing

HY22 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY22 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Results 2022

HY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 37.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 178.8% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +251.5pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 40.8%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -0.88x, -1.94x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SCT publishes next

Get the next Scott Technology briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.