Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Scott Technology (SCT) / HY26

Working capital absorbed $13.0m as debtor and inventory days hit new highs

PBT grew 18.0% and forward work climbed to $177m, but operating cash fell 58% on a working-capital build more than double the historical norm.

Industrials / Automation and robotics

SCT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $128.2m, versus $275.3m in FY25.

SCT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Unprecedented low ebitda margin. 10.2%; 4-period range 10.8% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 10.2%, unprecedented low; 4-period mean 11.1%, range 10.8%-11.5%.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high ebitda margin. 11.8%; 4-period range 10% to 11.5%. EBITDA margin: 11.8%, unprecedented high; 4-period mean 10.5%, range 10.0%-11.5%.
  • HY25 SCT: Outside range low ebitda margin. 10%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.8%. EBITDA margin: 10.0%, below normal range; 4-period mean 10.9%, range 10.2%-11.8%.
  • FY25 SCT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 11.5%; 4-period range 10.2% to 11.3%. EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.
EBITDA margin: 11.5%, above normal range; 4-period mean 10.8%, range 10.2%-11.3%.

SCT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $6.1m, versus $22.3m in FY25.

SCT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY21 SCT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $6.3m; 4-period range $7.2m to $18.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$6.3m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.9m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 SCT: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-4.9m; 4-period range $4.6m to $25.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.9m, unprecedented low; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$14.6m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY24 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $25.9m; 4-period range $-4.9m to $14.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$25.9m, unprecedented high; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$10.8m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
  • FY25 SCT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $18.1m; 4-period range $6.3m to $10.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$18.1m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$8.0m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
15 April 2026
Published
17 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs HY25

Revenue

$128.2m

+5.3% ↑ vs $121.7m

EBITDA

$13m

+7.0% ↑ vs $12.2m

Net profit after tax

$4.3m

flat vs $4.3m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$6.1m

-57.9% ↓ vs $14.5m

Interim dividend per share

4.0c

+33.3% ↑ vs 3.0c

Profit before tax

$5.9m

+18.0% ↑ vs $5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$13.7m

+10.9% ↑ vs $12.3m

Total assets

$268m

+9.7% ↑ vs $244.4m

What changed

Operating working capital absorbed NZ$13.0m in the half, sitting NZ$7.3m above Annolyse's historical baseline mean of NZ$5.7m and outside the prior 3-period range, with every recent comparable showing a build but none on this scale

Debtor days reached 64.4 and inventory days reached 64.4, both unprecedented in the four-period historical window (debtor mean 51.7, inventory mean 48.3). That absorption drove operating cash flow down 57.9% to NZ$6.1m from NZ$14.5m, and pulled OCF/EBITDA conversion to 46.9% from 119.2%; the 46.9% level itself is within the historical normal range (4-period mean 44.7%) because the HY25 comparable was unusually strong.

Revenue rose 5.3% to NZ$128.2m and EBITDA rose 7.0% to NZ$13.0m. PBT grew 18.0% to NZ$5.9m, but NPAT was flat at +0.0% as the effective tax rate reset to 23.4% from an unusually low 12.9%. Materials Handling (+21%) and Mining (+9%) offset Protein (-8%) and Appliances. Forward work climbed to NZ$177m from NZ$165m, and the interim dividend was lifted to 4.0 cps from 3.0 cps.

What matters

Balance-sheet pressure is the real story

  • Trade debtors rose 12.6% to NZ$45.4m and inventories rose 22.3% to NZ$45.3m, with both day-counts at unprecedented highs. For a project-based industrial this can reflect pre-delivery build and contract timing, but the scale (NZ$13.0m absorption versus a NZ$5.7m historical norm) and the simultaneous receivables stretch raise execution and customer sign-off risk that the release does not directly explain.
  • PBT is the cleaner operating read. PBT growth of 18.0% reflects real operating leverage on a 5.3% revenue lift, but NPAT growth of 0.0% is dominated by the tax rate normalising to 23.4% from 12.9%; the 23.4% rate is itself within Annolyse's historical baseline (4-period mean 23.7%), so the prior period was the anomaly, not the current one.
  • Dividend lifted into a tighter cash result. The 33.3% interim DPS increase pushed the payout ratio versus NPAT to 76.9% from 55.6%, sitting at the upper edge of the historical range (4-period mean 63.5%). FCF pre-lease of NZ$4.4m covers the dividend (76.4% payout on FCF), but only just, and only because capex stayed light at 1.4% of revenue.

Expectations

The supplied second-half shape is heavily H2-weighted: HY25 represented just 44.3% of FY25 revenue, 38.7% of EBITDA and 30.4% of NPAT, implying an FY26 step-up of roughly NZ$153m revenue and NZ$19.3m EBITDA in H2 to match FY25

Forward work of NZ$177m (versus NZ$165m at the same point last year) supports management's stated expectation of a stronger H2, alongside cited contract wins in Protein, Materials Handling and Appliances.

The Destination 2030 target of NZ$530m revenue by FY30 implies a 19.9% revenue CAGR. Annualised HY26 revenue is roughly NZ$256m, so the implied trajectory requires step-changes well above the current 5.3% growth rate. The release does not bridge that gap.

Quality of result

The earnings line is reasonable: EBITDA grew faster than revenue, gross margin held at 29%, and service revenue rose to 33% of mix from 31%, which is a higher-quality revenue shift

PBT growth of 18.0% is consistent with that operating picture, and FCF/NPAT of 100.7% looks healthy on the surface.

The cash-quality read is weaker than the conversion ratio alone suggests. Reported FCF pre-lease is only NZ$4.4m on capex held to NZ$1.7m (1.4% of revenue), so the conversion arithmetic is helped by underspending. The NZ$13.0m working-capital absorption — concentrated in receivables and inventory at unprecedented day-counts — means the H1 earnings number sits inside the balance sheet rather than in cash. Whether that reverses in H2 depends on contract delivery and customer sign-off timing, neither of which is quantified in the release.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving debtor days to 64.4 versus a historical maximum of 60.2 — slower customer payment, project milestone timing, or specific contract delays?
How much of the NZ$8.3m inventory increase is committed against named H2 deliveries versus speculative build, and when is it expected to release?
Why was the interim dividend lifted 33.3% into a payout ratio of 76.9% when operating cash fell 57.9%?
How does management bridge a current 5.3% revenue growth rate to the 19.9% CAGR implied by the Destination 2030 NZ$530m target?
Whether the cited Protein, Materials Handling and Appliances contract wins are sufficient to deliver the implied H2 EBITDA step-up of roughly NZ$19m versus the H1 NZ$13.0m base.

This briefing cannot assess the contractual milestone schedule or customer-specific receivable ageing that would confirm whether the working-capital build releases in H2.

Chat

Ask about SCT HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Scott Technology's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SCT HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Scott Technology's HY26 result.

What is driving debtor days to 64.4 versus a historical maximum of 60.2 — slower customer payment, project milestone timing, or specific contract delays?Why does "Balance-sheet pressure is the real story" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for SCT after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

2026 Half Year Announcement

HY26 / results release↗

2026 Half Year Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report↗

2026 Half Year Investor Presentation

HY26 / results presentation↗

company filing

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

2025 Half Year Financial Statements

HY25 / financial report↗

2025 Half Year Results Announcement

HY25 / results release↗

company filing

HY25 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

NZX Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Scott Announces FY25 Results

FY25 / results release↗

Scott Annual Report 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

Release context

Annual Meeting Presentation 2025

HY26 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 46.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -72.3pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 18.0pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 34.7%, with NPAT payout at 76.9%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 1.00x, -0.10x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SCT publishes next

Get the next Scott Technology briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.