Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Skellerup Holdings (SKL) / FY25

Cash conversion fell to 70.1% as working capital absorbed $9.0m

Revenue grew 6.9% and PBT 9.7%, but a lower effective tax rate flattered NPAT to +16.2% while inventory build pulled operating cash flow lower.

Industrials / Industrial products

SKL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $183.5m, versus $353.5m in FY25.

SKL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 26.9%, versus 26.8% in FY25.

SKL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $38.8m, versus $66.5m in FY25.

SKL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$3.5m, versus $9m in FY25.
Release date
21 August 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$353.5m

+6.9% ↑ vs $330.6m

EBITDA

$94.9m

+7.2% ↑ vs $88.5m

Net profit after tax

$54.5m

+16.2% ↑ vs $46.9m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$66.5m

-6.1% ↓ vs $70.8m

Full-year dividend per share

25.5c

+6.3% ↑ vs 24.0c

Total assets

$349.3m

+4.2% ↑ vs $335.1m

What changed

Revenue rose 6.9% to $353.5m and EBITDA rose 7.2% to $94.9m, with growth described as broad-based across the US, Europe and the UK

Profit before tax grew 9.7% to $74.3m. Reported NPAT rose 16.2% to $54.5m, but the effective tax rate fell from 30.8% to 26.5%, so PBT is the cleaner read on operating performance.

Operating cash flow fell 6.1% to $66.5m as working capital absorbed roughly $9.0m, driven by an $6.3m inventory build (+8.7%) and a $2.7m rise in trade debtors. Cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) fell from 80.0% to 70.1%.

Net debt finished at $12.4m (0.13x EBITDA, from 0.17x), and the board declared a final dividend of 16.5 cps, taking the FY25 total to 25.5 cps versus 24.0 cps in FY24.

What matters

NPAT growth overstates the operating result

PBT grew 9.7% but NPAT grew 16.2%, a 6.5pp gap driven by the effective tax rate falling from 30.8% to 26.5%. The underlying earnings step-up is real but materially smaller than the headline NPAT figure suggests, which matters because the company is presenting this as a "record" NPAT result.

Cash conversion deteriorated by roughly 10 percentage points. OCF/EBITDA fell from 80.0% to 70.1% because earnings growth was partly reinvested in inventory, with inventory days rising to 80.4 from 79.0. In a project-based industrials business, deliberate inventory positioning ahead of customer demand can be rational, but it pushes cash recognition into future periods and lifts the bar for next-year demand follow-through.

Segment mix is moving favourably in Agri. Agri division revenue rose 8.1% with disclosed gross margin expanding from 29.2% to 31.1%, while the larger Industrial division saw margin compress from 20.7% to 20.1%. Agri contributed disproportionately to result growth, which raises the read-through risk if rubberware demand patterns normalise from the strong H1 run.

Expectations

No forward earnings target was supplied with the result, so this release is judged against the H1 shape rather than guidance

HY25 contributed 46.8% of full-year revenue, 45.5% of EBITDA and 44.3% of NPAT, implying a second-half weighted year on every line. Implied H2 EBITDA of roughly $51.7m and H2 NPAT of $30.4m mean the second half carried the result.

Operating cash flow was more evenly split (HY25 took 48.5%), so the H2 EBITDA step-up did not convert proportionately into cash. That matters because the company will lap a stronger H2 base in FY26, and any continued working-capital investment would compound the cash-conversion gap rather than close it.

Quality of result

Underlying earnings quality is mixed but not weak

PBT growth of 9.7% on revenue growth of 6.9% implies modest operating leverage, and ROE strengthened to 22.7% from 20.4%. Capex was light at 2.3% of revenue ($8.3m, down from $9.4m), and free cash flow before lease payments of $58.2m still covered NPAT at 106.7% (prior 130.9%) and the full-year dividend at an 85.9% payout. Net debt fell to 0.13x EBITDA, leaving meaningful balance-sheet flexibility.

The qualifications are concentrated in two places. First, the NPAT growth rate is flattered by a 4.3pp drop in the effective tax rate that has not been explained in the supplied excerpts. Second, the cash result depends on a working-capital build that the company at HY25 described as "risk mitigation" rather than demand-pull; whether that inventory unwinds into revenue or sits as excess stock is the key durability question.

Unresolved

Open questions

What drove the effective tax rate down from 30.8% to 26.5%, and is the 26.5% level sustainable into FY26?
How much of the $6.3m inventory build is locked-in customer demand versus precautionary positioning, and when does it convert to cash?
Why did the Industrial division's gross margin slip from 20.7% to 20.1% despite revenue growth, and is freight or input-cost pressure expected to continue?
Can Agri's 31.1% gross margin be sustained, or did FY25 benefit from a one-off mix or volume pulse in dairy rubberware?
How is management thinking about capital allocation at a 91.7% NPAT payout ratio with net debt already only 0.13x EBITDA?

This briefing cannot assess forward order book, customer-specific demand visibility, or the sustainability of the lower tax rate without management commentary on those items.

Chat

Ask about SKL FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Skellerup Holdings's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKL FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Skellerup Holdings's FY25 result.

What drove the effective tax rate down from 30.8% to 26.5%, and is the 26.5% level sustainable into FY26?Why does "NPAT growth overstates the operating result" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for SKL after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

FY25 Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

FY25 Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

FY25 Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

FY25 Results Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

FY24 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

FY24 Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

FY24 Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

FY24 Results Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

Interim context

Interim Report HY25

HY25 / financial report↗

Media Release HY25

HY25 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY25

HY25 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation HY25

HY25 / results presentation↗

Release context

FY24 Results Presentation Webinar

FY24 / commentary↗

FY25 Results Presentation Webinar

FY25 / commentary↗

FY24 ASM Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 70.1% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -9.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 6.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 92.0% on a NPAT basis, with NPAT payout at 91.7%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.13x, -0.04x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKL publishes next

Get the next Skellerup Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.