Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

Revenue +10% but PBT flat as inventory build pushed net debt to $39.0m

A 32% inventory build absorbed working capital and lifted net debt by $13.4m while the raised dividend now consumes 160.1% of pre-lease free cash flow.

SKL metric context

No comparable metric history is available for this result.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

These ratios pair a market close from around the result date with verified filing data. An unavailable metric means the required inputs were missing or unsuitable for comparison.

Prices as at close, 4 September 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$1.5b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

21.98x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.35

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

0.91x

i

P/E compared with recent earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

13.98x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

21.73x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

5.67x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and investment-company measures

Yield and investment-company valuation where supported.

Dividend yield

3.5%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
16 February 2023
Published
22 April 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY23 vs HY22

Revenue

$165.5m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$41.1m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$23m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$20.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

8.0c

+6.7% ↑ vs 7.5c

Total assets

$339.6m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofSKL HY23Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

Revenue rose 10.0% to $165.5m, but earnings barely moved: PBT grew 0.3% to $31.5m and NPAT fell 0.9% to $23.0m

Operating profit was up 3.4% to $33.5m, well behind revenue, indicating cost absorption above the gross line.

Operating cash flow rose only 2.6% to $20.2m despite the 10% revenue lift. Inventory climbed 32.1% to $80.4m, which is the central balance-sheet movement and the main reason gross borrowings rose 31.0% to $55.0m and net debt moved to $39.0m from $25.6m a year ago.

The interim dividend was raised to 8.0c from 7.5c, a 6.7% increase.

What matters

Operating leverage went the wrong way

  • Revenue +10.0% delivered EBIT +3.4% and PBT +0.3%. Mix is part of the story: the Industrial Division (now 65.6% of revenue versus 63.9%) is disclosed at a 19.7% margin against Agri at 25.7%, and Agri's segment result fell to $14.6m from $16.7m. The implication is that the headline growth narrative masks underlying margin compression in the higher-margin division.

  • A $17.7m working-capital build drove the cash and leverage story. Inventory days rose 14.85 days to 88.5, partly offset by receivable days falling 7.42 days to 54.0. Management attributes the inventory lift to "strategic decisions to mitigate risk and meet expected customer demand." This matters because the inventory absorption — not earnings — explains the $13.4m rise in net debt versus the prior comparable period, so cash quality must be read through that lens.

  • The dividend is now almost fully consuming pre-lease FCF. Pre-lease FCF was $15.9m against $16.0m of declared dividends, giving a payout-vs-FCF-pre-lease ratio of 98.6% (up from 89.9%). NPAT-based payout rose to 68.1% from 63.1%. There is little buffer if the inventory build does not unwind.

Expectations

No FY23 NPAT guidance is provided in this release, in contrast to HY22 when the company guided $44–$47m for the full year

The supplied shape context shows HY22 represented 47.5% of FY22 revenue and 48.5% of FY22 NPAT, so the business is modestly second-half weighted. Annualising the current half implies revenue around $331.0m, but management has not framed expectations either way, so the release does not support a firm second-half read.

The implication: with inventory at a multi-year high in days terms and net debt rising, the second-half question is less about top-line momentum and more about whether the working-capital build reverses and protects the dividend coverage ratio.

Quality of result

Revenue growth looks underlying — 10.0% with no flagged one-offs or non-recurring items — but the conversion to cash and equity returns is weaker than the headlines suggest

EBIT grew less than half as fast as revenue. The effective tax rate moved to 27.0% from 26.1%, and higher interest costs explain why NPAT was slightly down even with PBT flat; PBT is therefore the cleaner operating read, and it was essentially unchanged.

Earnings quality is being supported by a balance sheet that has expanded: total liabilities rose 22.8% and gross borrowings 31.0% while equity rose only 5.0%. ROE slipped to 11.0% from 11.7%. FCF-to-NPAT held at 69.1% versus 70.2%, but in absolute terms pre-lease FCF declined to $15.9m from $16.3m even as capex stepped up 27.8% to $4.3m (2.6% of revenue).

This matters because the "record EBIT" framing is true but narrow: the cash and leverage profile is meaningfully weaker than a clean reading of revenue growth would imply.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why has Agri's segment result fallen with revenue up, and is the lower-margin Industrial mix shift structural or cyclical?
When does the inventory build unwind, and what is the planned working-capital trajectory into the second half?
Why has no FY23 NPAT guidance been provided when HY22 disclosed a full-year range?
How comfortable is the board with a dividend that now consumes 160.1% of pre-lease FCF, and what would trigger a payout review?
Will the higher capex run-rate continue, and is it linked to the inventory and demand decisions cited?

This briefing cannot assess forward order book, customer-by-customer demand, or the durability of the segment margins beyond what is disclosed in this release.

Ask about SKL HY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Skellerup Holdings's HY23 result.

Why has Agri's segment result fallen with revenue up, and is the lower-margin Industrial mix shift structural or cyclical?Why does "Operating leverage went the wrong way" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY23?What should I watch next for SKL after HY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Report HY23

HY23 / financial report

Media Release HY23

HY23 / media release

Results Announcement HY23

HY23 / results announcement

Results Presentation HY23

HY23 / results presentation

Prior comparable period

Interim Report HY22

HY22 / financial report

Media Release HY22

HY22 / media release

Results Announcement HY22

HY22 / results announcement

Full-year context

FY22 Annual Report

FY22 / financial report

FY22 Media Release

FY22 / media release

FY22 Results Announcement

FY22 / results announcement

Release context

FY22 ASM Presentation

HY23 / commentary

Get notified when SKL publishes next

Get the next Skellerup Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.