Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Skellerup Holdings (SKL) / HY25

Record $24.2m NPAT and 115.4% FCF conversion cut net debt to $20.4m

Earnings expanded on essentially flat revenue, but inventory days rose to 94.5 as working capital absorbed $6.9m of cash.

Industrials / Industrial products

SKL revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $183.5m, versus $353.5m in FY25.

SKL EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 26.9%, versus 26.8% in FY25.

SKL operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $38.8m, versus $66.5m in FY25.

SKL working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was -$3.5m, versus $9m in FY25.
Release date
13 February 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$165.3m

-0.1% ↓ vs $165.5m

EBITDA

$43.2m

— vs —

Net profit after tax

$24.2m

+5.2% ↑ vs $23m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$32.2m

+59.7% ↑ vs $20.2m

Interim dividend per share

9.0c

+12.5% ↑ vs 8.0c

Cash and cash equivalents

$18.6m

+16.2% ↑ vs $16m

Total assets

$346.1m

+1.9% ↑ vs $339.6m

What changed

Skellerup converted essentially flat revenue ($165.3m, -0.1%) into a record $24.2m NPAT (+5.2%) and $27.9m of free cash flow, with the cash result cutting net debt to $20.4m and supporting a lift in the interim dividend to 9.0c (+12.5%)

PBT rose 5.1% to $33.1m and operating profit 4.4% to $35.0m on a stable 27.0% effective tax rate — modest operating leverage on a flat top line. EBITDA was $43.2m, and FCF converted at 115.4% of NPAT, up from 70.2%. Gross borrowings declined from $55.0m to $39.0m.

Industrial division revenue rose to 69.8% of group from 65.7%, while Agri's share fell 3.8 pp to 30.6%. Capex remained light at 2.6% of revenue.

What matters

Cash generation outpaced earnings

FCF of $27.9m on NPAT growth of only 5.2% funded the step-down in gross borrowings and a higher 9.0c interim dividend (73.0% of NPAT but just 63.3% of FCF). For a project-based industrial, this signals tight collections and capex discipline in H1.

Working-capital absorption is the offset. Operating working capital rose $6.9m, with inventory days extending from 88.5 to 94.5 and receivable days from 53.9 to 55.7. Management frames the inventory build as risk mitigation, but in a project-based business rising inventory ahead of demand creates cash drag risk if H2 sell-through underwhelms — and the build is happening even though revenue did not grow.

Segment mix has rotated toward lower-margin Industrial. Industrial revenue grew to 69.8% of group at a disclosed 19.4% gross margin, while Agri retreated to 30.6% at a materially higher 30.7% gross margin. The Industrial volume tailwind is carrying the top line, but the mix shift is a slight headwind to blended gross margin — the absence of revenue growth despite Industrial expansion underlines this.

Expectations

No forward-work metrics, order book, or stated targets are disclosed

Management positions the inventory build as deliberate risk mitigation, which is consistent with the project-based industrial frame where lumpy delivery cycles can warrant pre-positioning. Without supplied guidance or forward-work disclosure, the H2 read hinges on whether Industrial momentum sustains and whether the Agri rebound (management cites strong dairy rubberware demand on a weak prior period) continues. The release supports a conclusion that H1 earnings quality is solid, but it does not support a confident view of H2 trajectory.

Quality of result

The result looks largely durable

The effective tax rate is unchanged at 27.0%, so there is no tax distortion masking operating performance, and PBT and NPAT growth are aligned (5.1% vs 5.2%) — there is no one-off layer in the bridge. FCF of $27.9m converted at 115.4% of NPAT, well above prior. Leverage at roughly 0.5x net debt/EBITDA leaves substantial capacity, and capex at 2.6% of revenue is not flattering cash through under-investment relative to recent history.

The principal quality caveat is working capital. The $6.9m absorption — driven by a six-day extension in inventory days — consumes cash that would otherwise compound the deleveraging. ROE softened to 10.6% from 11.0% as equity grew faster than NPAT, which is the natural consequence of debt repayment building book value. The 9.0c dividend is comfortably covered by FCF (63.3% payout vs FCF) but consumes 73.0% of NPAT, up from 68.1%; sustained higher payout depends on cash conversion holding through the inventory cycle.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the six-day extension in inventory days, and at what point would management consider the risk-mitigation buffer fully built?
Why did Agri revenue contract while Industrial expanded, and how does management expect the segment mix to evolve in H2?
How sustainable is the H1 cash-conversion uplift once the inventory build normalises?
Will the deleveraged balance sheet pivot capital allocation toward acquisitions, capex, or a higher ordinary payout?
Does the freight cost and product mix headwind flagged for Industrial signal pricing pressure into H2?

This briefing cannot assess H2 phasing or full-year trajectory because no forward-work, order book, or stated guidance metrics were disclosed.

Chat

Ask about SKL HY25

Ask follow-up questions about Skellerup Holdings's HY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKL HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Skellerup Holdings's HY25 result.

What is driving the six-day extension in inventory days, and at what point would management consider the risk-mitigation buffer fully built?Why does "Cash generation outpaced earnings" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for SKL after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Report HY25

HY25 / financial report↗

Media Release HY25

HY25 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY25

HY25 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation HY25

HY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Report HY23

HY24 / financial report↗

Media Release HY23

HY24 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY23

HY24 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Interim Report HY24

FY24 / financial report↗

Media Release HY24

FY24 / media release↗

Results Announcement HY24

FY24 / results announcement↗

Release context

FY24 ASM Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 109.0%, with NPAT payout at 73.0%.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 74.6% of EBITDA to operating cash flow.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is 0.47x for this result.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.1pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKL publishes next

Get the next Skellerup Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.