Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Serko (SKO) / FY22

FCF burned NZ$34.5m as capex surged 122.5% on revenue growth of 43.8%

Revenue recovery accelerated but investment intensity deepened losses 22.4%, leaving Serko dependent on its fresh capital raise to fund the runway.

Technology / Travel software

SKO revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $119.4m, versus $61.1m in HY26.

SKO EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -19.1%, versus -27% in FY24.

SKO operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $7m, versus $8.6m in HY26.

SKO working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY22 SKO: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $2.5m; 3-period range $6.8m to $15.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$2.5m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$11.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 SKO: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $7.6m; 4-period range $-0.4m to $7.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$7.6m, above normal range; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.1m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.4m.
  • HY26 SKO: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $15.9m; 3-period range $2.5m to $11.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$15.9m, above normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$6.8m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY26 SKO: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-0.4m; 4-period range $0m to $7.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.4m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.4m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.4m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
18 May 2022
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$17.9m

+43.8% ↑ vs $12.4m

Net profit after tax

$0m

flat vs $0m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$18.5m

-2.3% ↓ vs −$18m

Profit before tax

$0m

flat vs $0m

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.13m

+257.1% ↑ vs $0.04m

Total assets

$167.2m

+50.2% ↑ vs $111.3m

What changed

Pre-lease free cash flow burned NZ$34.5m in FY22, well below Serko's company historical range of NZ$-5.5m to NZ$1.3m and NZ$31.6m below the historical mean of NZ$-2.9m, because capex surged 122.5% to NZ$16.1m — representing 88.9% of revenue — as the company accelerated product and platform investment alongside its $85m capital raise

Revenue rose 43.8% to NZ$17.9m, with segment revenue of NZ$19.8m beating the midpoint of the NZ$18.5m–NZ$20.5m guidance range, while online travel booking volumes jumped 67% to 2.15 million. Despite that recovery, operating losses widened: NPAT declined 22.4% to a loss of NZ$36.0m and PBT worsened 22.7%, reflecting cost growth that outpaced the revenue rebound. Operating cash outflow was broadly flat at NZ$-18.5m versus NZ$-18.0m a year earlier.

The balance sheet was materially reshaped by the equity raise: cash moved from NZ$34.9m to NZ$124.5m, lifting total assets to NZ$167.2m — NZ$42.9m above the historical mean of NZ$124.3m.

What matters

Investment intensity is the primary economic driver, not underlying operating deterioration

Capex at 88.9% of revenue versus 58.3% a year ago explains the FCF step-down. The company is deliberately deploying raise proceeds into product and North American expansion rather than managing toward near-term profitability, so the loss widening is investment-phase math, not a deteriorating core business.

Debtor days of 44.2 are meaningfully elevated relative to Serko's own baseline of 18.9–28.7 days. At 21.9 days above the historical mean, this is worth monitoring: in a transaction-volume recovery with growing Booking.com for Business exposure, receivables timing could reflect mix or platform-related settlement lags. If it persists it represents cash-flow slippage on an already negative-OCF base.

The H2 shape showed meaningful improvement. The HY22 interims recorded NPAT of NZ$-15.2m; the implied second-half NPAT was NZ$-20.8m, meaning H2 was the heavier loss period despite a stronger booking environment. This suggests cost step-ups and investment deployment were concentrated in the second half, which matters for the trajectory entering FY23.

Expectations

Serko beat the midpoint of its own segment revenue guidance (NZ$19.8m against a NZ$18.5m–NZ$20.5m range), which is a meaningful positive given the booking volume recovery was constrained by COVID travel restrictions through much of the year

The 67% growth in online bookings signals improving operating leverage potential as volumes normalise, and management cited average revenue per booking rising 8% to NZ$5.80.

No formal FY23 financial targets are disclosed in this release. The company is in an explicit investment phase with average cash burn of approximately NZ$3.0m per month cited in the presentation materials and NZ$124.5m of cash on hand. The key uncertainty is whether booking-volume momentum can sustain pace sufficient to bend the FCF curve before the company needs to revisit the capital markets.

Quality of result

The revenue result is operationally credible: booking volumes, ARPB, and room nights all moved in the expected direction, and segment revenue exceeded guidance

However, the reported NPAT and FCF are heavily investment-shaped rather than reflective of underlying earnings power. With capex at 88.9% of revenue and capitalised development alone at NZ$15.3m, a significant portion of FY22 spending is being deferred to the income statement via future amortisation. This means reported losses are not a clean read on the cash economics going forward; the amortisation drag will build.

Cash quality is constrained: OCF of NZ$-18.5m was flat year-on-year despite 43.8% revenue growth, implying operating scale benefits were absorbed by cost growth. FCF of NZ$-34.5m against the historical range of NZ$-5.5m to NZ$1.3m is structural at current investment levels. Debtor days of 44.2 against the historical baseline mean of 22.3 days represents the most concrete near-term watch item for cash conversion.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving debtor days to 44.2 days — nearly double the historical mean — and is this a platform mix effect from Booking.com for Business receivables or a collection issue?
Why did H2 losses deepen relative to H1 given the stronger booking environment, and what is the planned cost trajectory into FY23?
How does management define the capital deployment milestones that would signal a transition from investment phase to operating leverage harvesting?
Will the North American Booking.com for Business rollout generate measurable contracted revenue growth that de-risks the cash runway assumption?
Is the 88.9% capex-to-revenue ratio expected to normalise in FY23, and what is the implied capitalised development run-rate?

This briefing cannot assess whether the Booking.com for Business channel concentration creates renewal or renegotiation risk that would alter the forward revenue trajectory.

Chat

Ask about SKO FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Serko's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKO FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Serko's FY22 result.

What is driving debtor days to 44.2 days — nearly double the historical mean — and is this a platform mix effect from Booking.com for Business receivables or a collection issue?Why does "Investment intensity is the primary economic driver, not underlying operating deterioration" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for SKO after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report

FY22 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY22 / results presentation↗

Market Release - Cover Announcement

FY22 / results announcement↗

Market Release - Cover Announcement

FY22 / results release↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report

FY21 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY21 / results presentation↗

Market Release

FY21 / results release↗

Market Release - Cover Announcement

FY21 / results announcement↗

Interim context

Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY22 / results presentation↗

NZX Appendix 2

HY22 / results announcement↗

Results Announcement - Market Release

HY22 / results release↗

Release context

2021 Annual Meeting Results

HY22 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 43.8% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.3pp.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -23.8%, +4.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKO publishes next

Get the next Serko briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.