Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Serko (SKO) / HY26

GetThere lifted revenue 47.4% but PBT loss widened 84.4%

Acquisition makes this not a clean comparable, though pre-lease free cash flow improved to NZ$3.0m above historical norms.

Technology / Travel software

SKO revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $119.4m, versus $61.1m in HY26.

SKO EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was -19.1%, versus -27% in FY24.

SKO operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $7m, versus $8.6m in HY26.

SKO working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY22 SKO: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $2.5m; 3-period range $6.8m to $15.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$2.5m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$11.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY22 SKO: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-4.3m; 3-period range $-0.4m to $7.6m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-4.3m, below normal range; 2/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-0.4m.
  • FY24 SKO: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $7.6m; 3-period range $-4.3m to $7.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$7.6m, above normal range; 1/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$7.1m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-2.3m.
  • HY26 SKO: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $15.9m; 3-period range $2.5m to $11.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$15.9m, above normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$6.8m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$15.9m, above normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$6.8m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
2025-11-18T08:37:34+13:00
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY26 vs FY25

Revenue

$61.1m

+47.4% ↑ vs $41.5m

EBITDA

—

— vs $1b

Net profit after tax

−$9.5b

-86.2% ↓ vs −$5.1b

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$8.6m

+82.6% ↑ vs $4.7m

Profit before tax

−$8.5b

-84.4% ↓ vs −$4.6b

Cash and cash equivalents

$65m

+196.2% ↑ vs $22m

Total assets

$123.4m

-2.6% ↓ vs $126.7m

What changed

Revenue rose 47.4% to NZ$61.1m, but the result is acquisition-assisted: GetThere closed in January 2025 and is now embedded in the top line

Against that, the PBT loss widened 84.4% to NZ$8.5m and NPAT widened 86.2% to NZ$9.5m, both at the lower edge of the supplied historical range. Operating cash flow grew 82.6% to NZ$8.6m and pre-lease free cash flow reached NZ$3.0m, which sits above Annolyse's historical baseline (four-period mean -NZ$15.9m, range -NZ$42.8m to NZ$1.9m). Cash and short-term deposits stood at NZ$65.0m versus NZ$22.0m at the prior reference date, and total liabilities rose 120.5% to NZ$31.2m, consistent with the acquisition overlay.

What matters

The 47.4% revenue lift is not directly comparable

GetThere's January 2025 close means HY26 contains a part-period contribution that was absent from HY25. Management commentary cites slower-than-expected GetThere customer exits and US revenue slightly ahead of plan, which supports the headline but does not isolate the organic rate. Without a disclosed organic split, the durable underlying growth cannot be read off this release.

Free cash flow strengthened despite wider losses. Pre-lease FCF of NZ$3.0m is above the historical range, and it grew on a deeper NPAT loss, so cash generation improved on a structural rather than profit-led basis. This is the cleanest positive in the result, though FCF/NPAT of -31.5% shows the conversion ratio still rests on continued cost discipline rather than profitability.

Equity contracted faster than the half-year loss. Total equity fell NZ$20.3m to NZ$92.2m while NPAT was -NZ$9.5m, leaving roughly NZ$10m of equity movement unexplained by reported earnings. The release does not reconcile this gap, which matters for understanding the true capital cost of GetThere and any associated reserves or share-based items.

Expectations

No FY26 target is disclosed in the release

Against last year's full-year shape, HY26 represents 67.8% of FY25 revenue and 53.7% of FY25 NPAT, but the GetThere consolidation makes that mechanical comparison unreliable as a guide to the second half. The release flags positive EBITDAFI of NZ$6.1m (versus prior-period EBITDAF of NZ$1.0m) and stabilised customer churn around 1% on key accounts, which point to operating leverage if cost discipline holds. What the release does not support is a quantified read on second-half revenue trajectory or NPAT breakeven timing.

Quality of result

The cash-quality signal is genuine: pre-lease FCF of NZ$3.0m sits above the supplied historical range, and ROE improved to -10.3% from -4.5%, classified at the upper edge of the four-period baseline

Capex intensity drifted modestly to 7.1% of revenue (HY25: 6.7%) while capex grew 56.5%, consistent with continued platform investment rather than a step-down.

Two factors temper the read. Operating working capital expanded NZ$15.9m as trade debtors rose 144.1% to NZ$8.0m and debtor days moved to 47.5 from 28.7 (still within the supplied historical range mean of 54.1 days), so part of the OCF lift reflects mix and timing rather than steady-state collection. Separately, the effective tax rate of -11.6% is unprecedented in the supplied baseline (mean 3.2%) and widens NPAT below PBT, but the PBT-to-NPAT growth gap is only 1.8 percentage points, so PBT remains the cleaner operating read and tax is not the main story here.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is the organic revenue growth rate excluding GetThere's part-period contribution, and how much of the 47.4% lift would have flowed through without the acquisition?
Why did total equity fall NZ$20.3m when the reported half-year loss was only NZ$9.5m, and what reserve or capital movement explains the residual?
What is management's FY26 revenue and EBITDAFI outlook, and when does the business expect to reach NPAT breakeven on the enlarged base?
How much of the NZ$15.9m working-capital build is GetThere onboarding versus a structural shift in customer payment terms?
Will the unprecedented -11.6% effective tax rate normalise as US profitability scales, or does it reflect persistent jurisdictional mix from the post-acquisition footprint?

This briefing cannot assess GetThere's standalone economics or determine what proportion of the FCF and revenue improvement is organic versus acquired.

Chat

Ask about SKO HY26

Ask follow-up questions about Serko's HY26 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKO HY26

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Serko's HY26 result.

What is the organic revenue growth rate excluding GetThere's part-period contribution, and how much of the 47.4% lift would have flowed through without the acquisition?Why does "The 47.4% revenue lift is not directly comparable" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY26?What should I watch next for SKO after HY26?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Interim Financial Statements

HY26 / financial report↗

Investor presentation - H1 FY26 results

HY26 / results presentation↗

Market Release - FY26 Interim Results

HY26 / results release↗

NZX Appendix 2

HY26 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Interim Report 2025

FY25 / financial report↗

Market Release

FY25 / results release↗

Interim context

Interim Report 2025

HY26 / financial report↗

Market Release

HY26 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 1.8pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 47.4% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -10.3%, -5.8pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Debtor days were 48 days for this result.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKO publishes next

Get the next Serko briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.