Revenue
$750.7m
-2.1% ↓ vs $766.7m
Cash conversion dropped 10 percentage points to 80.9% as the full-year dividend was lifted to 22.0 cps against NPAT payout of 149.8%.
Revenue context before the current result.
EBITDA margin across covered periods.
Operating cash flow across covered periods.
Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.
Key metrics
FY25 vs FY24
Revenue
$750.7m
-2.1% ↓ vs $766.7m
EBITDA
$0.15m
-2.6% ↓ vs $0.15m
Net profit after tax
$0m
flat vs $0m
Net cash inflow from operating activities
$120.2m
-13.6% ↓ vs $139.1m
Full-year dividend per share
22.0c
+15.8% ↑ vs 19.0c
Profit before tax
$0m
Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.
Cash and cash equivalents
$0.03m
-15.8% ↓ vs $0.04m
Total assets
$672.9m
-1.2% ↓ vs $681.4m
What changed
The bottom line moved far harder: PBT dropped 57.9% to $28.9m and NPAT dropped 58.7% to $20.2m. The effective tax rate was essentially unchanged (27.6% versus 27.5%), so the distortion sits between EBITDA and pre-tax profit, not in the tax line.
Operating cash flow fell 13.7% to $120.2m and cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) dropped to 80.9% from 90.9%. Post-lease free cash flow was broadly stable at $24.8m versus $23.7m. The full-year dividend was lifted to 22.0 cps from 19.0 cps (+15.8%), and FY26 dividend guidance of at least 30 cps was disclosed. An acquisition was flagged in the release but is not detailed in the supplied materials.
What matters
EBITDA fell only 2.6%, but PBT and NPAT fell ~58%. With tax rates stable, the divergence reflects items between EBITDA and pre-tax profit — depreciation/amortisation, impairments, or non-recurring items. The calculation pass flags that non-recurring items were present, and at HY25 management framed similar items as "largely non-cash or expected to be cash neutral" masking a more positive underlying result, but the FY25 detail in the supplied excerpts does not decompose the gap.
Cash conversion deteriorated meaningfully. OCF/EBITDA fell 10 percentage points to 80.9%, with operating cash flow shrinking far more than EBITDA. This means working capital, programming-rights timing, or financing flows are absorbing cash that previously dropped through. It matters because the dividend leans on free cash flow, not reported earnings.
Dividend policy now sits well ahead of the earnings line. The 22.0 cps full-year dividend implies a payout of 149.8% of FY25 NPAT (versus 55.2% prior) and 71.3% of pre-lease FCF. FY26 guidance of at least 30 cps would step that up by ~36% again. With ROE down to 4.6% from 10.9%, sustaining the lifted distribution rests entirely on FCF, which means the deterioration in cash conversion is the key risk to monitor.
Expectations
No explicit FY26 revenue or EBITDA targets are provided in the materials supplied here; the only forward financial figure is the at-least 30 cps dividend guidance.
Against the HY25 shape, the second half delivered roughly $88m of EBITDA versus $60.7m in H1, broadly consistent with the H2 weighting management flagged at the interim as programming-cost timing reversed. So the within-year cadence tracked the signalled pattern, which means the FY25 print itself was not the surprise — the open question is what FY26 looks like once the acquisition and the lifted dividend run-rate are layered on.
Quality of result
At the FCF level, post-lease free cash flow of $24.8m was essentially flat against $23.7m, with capex steady at around 10.4% of revenue. The cash that the dividend actually draws on did not deteriorate, and FCF covered FY25 NPAT 1.2x — so headline NPAT understates the cash generation.
Two quality signals are negative. First, OCF/EBITDA fell 10 percentage points to 80.9%, so each dollar of EBITDA produced materially less operating cash than a year ago. Second, the gap between EBITDA decline (-2.6%) and NPAT decline (-58.7%) reflects items below EBITDA that the supplied excerpts do not fully reconcile; until those items are decomposed, the durability of the bottom-line read cannot be confirmed.
The revenue mix continues to shift: Sky Box/Pod fell from 65.1% to 62.6% of revenue, while Sky Sport Now (+1.5pp share), Broadband (+1.3pp), and Advertising (+0.6pp) grew. The streaming and broadband transition is continuing but is not yet offsetting linear-TV decline.
Unresolved
This briefing cannot assess the specific composition of items below EBITDA, the acquisition terms, or whether the FY26 dividend guidance is supported by management's expected free cash flow trajectory.
Chat
Ask follow-up questions about Sky Network Television's FY25 result.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.
Open to load segment breakdown.
Open to load analytical metrics.
Open to load key metrics.
Annual Report
FY25 / financial reportInvestor Presentation
FY25 / results presentationMarket Release
FY25 / results releaseResults Announcement
FY25 / results announcement2024 Annual Report
FY24 / financial reportInvestor Presentation
FY24 / results presentationNZX Results Announcement
FY24 / results announcementNZX Results Announcement
FY24 / results release2025 Interim Report
HY25 / financial reportInvestor Presentation
HY25 / results presentationMarket release
HY25 / results releaseResults Announcement
HY25 / results announcementSky ASM 2024 - Presentation
HY25 / commentaryRelated insights
Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.
Cash conversion quality
This result converted 80.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -9.9pp versus the prior comparable period.
Dividend coverage and payout pressure
Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 1.2%, with NPAT payout at 149.8%.
Leverage and balance-sheet risk
Net debt / EBITDA is -0.22x, +0.03x versus the prior comparable period.
Earnings quality and statutory distortions
PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.8pp.
Get the next Sky Network Television briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.