Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Sky Network Television (SKT) / FY25

NPAT fell 58.7% on a 2.1% revenue decline despite dividend lift

Cash conversion dropped 10 percentage points to 80.9% as the full-year dividend was lifted to 22.0 cps against NPAT payout of 149.8%.

Telecommunications & Media / Pay television

SKT revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $414.4m, versus $0.75m in FY25.

SKT EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY24 SKT: Outside range high ebitda margin. 20.8%; 3-period range 15.8% to 19.5%. EBITDA margin: 20.8%, above normal range; 3-period mean 18.0%, range 15.8%-19.5%.
  • HY25 SKT: Outside range low ebitda margin. 15.8%; 3-period range 18.9% to 20.8%. EBITDA margin: 15.8%, below normal range; 3-period mean 19.7%, range 18.9%-20.8%.
EBITDA margin: 15.8%, below normal range; 3-period mean 19.7%, range 18.9%-20.8%.

SKT operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $99m, versus $120.2m in FY25.

SKT working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • HY23 SKT: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $706.1m; 4-period range $-874.7m to $13.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$706.1m, unprecedented high; 1/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$13.5m, and 3 had releases averaging NZ$-589.8m.
  • HY25 SKT: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-874.7m; 4-period range $-843.7m to $706.1m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-874.7m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$359.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-447.4m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-874.7m, below normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$359.8m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-447.4m.
Release date
22 August 2025
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$750.7m

-2.1% ↓ vs $766.7m

EBITDA

$0.15m

-2.6% ↓ vs $0.15m

Net profit after tax

$0m

flat vs $0m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$120.2m

-13.6% ↓ vs $139.1m

Full-year dividend per share

22.0c

+15.8% ↑ vs 19.0c

Profit before tax

$0m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$0.03m

-15.8% ↓ vs $0.04m

Total assets

$672.9m

-1.2% ↓ vs $681.4m

What changed

Revenue fell 2.1% to $750.7m and EBITDA fell 2.6% to $148.5m — a modest top-line erosion

The bottom line moved far harder: PBT dropped 57.9% to $28.9m and NPAT dropped 58.7% to $20.2m. The effective tax rate was essentially unchanged (27.6% versus 27.5%), so the distortion sits between EBITDA and pre-tax profit, not in the tax line.

Operating cash flow fell 13.7% to $120.2m and cash conversion (OCF/EBITDA) dropped to 80.9% from 90.9%. Post-lease free cash flow was broadly stable at $24.8m versus $23.7m. The full-year dividend was lifted to 22.0 cps from 19.0 cps (+15.8%), and FY26 dividend guidance of at least 30 cps was disclosed. An acquisition was flagged in the release but is not detailed in the supplied materials.

What matters

The earnings collapse below EBITDA is the central question

EBITDA fell only 2.6%, but PBT and NPAT fell ~58%. With tax rates stable, the divergence reflects items between EBITDA and pre-tax profit — depreciation/amortisation, impairments, or non-recurring items. The calculation pass flags that non-recurring items were present, and at HY25 management framed similar items as "largely non-cash or expected to be cash neutral" masking a more positive underlying result, but the FY25 detail in the supplied excerpts does not decompose the gap.

Cash conversion deteriorated meaningfully. OCF/EBITDA fell 10 percentage points to 80.9%, with operating cash flow shrinking far more than EBITDA. This means working capital, programming-rights timing, or financing flows are absorbing cash that previously dropped through. It matters because the dividend leans on free cash flow, not reported earnings.

Dividend policy now sits well ahead of the earnings line. The 22.0 cps full-year dividend implies a payout of 149.8% of FY25 NPAT (versus 55.2% prior) and 71.3% of pre-lease FCF. FY26 guidance of at least 30 cps would step that up by ~36% again. With ROE down to 4.6% from 10.9%, sustaining the lifted distribution rests entirely on FCF, which means the deterioration in cash conversion is the key risk to monitor.

Expectations

Management states the result landed within the revised guidance ranges reset in February

No explicit FY26 revenue or EBITDA targets are provided in the materials supplied here; the only forward financial figure is the at-least 30 cps dividend guidance.

Against the HY25 shape, the second half delivered roughly $88m of EBITDA versus $60.7m in H1, broadly consistent with the H2 weighting management flagged at the interim as programming-cost timing reversed. So the within-year cadence tracked the signalled pattern, which means the FY25 print itself was not the surprise — the open question is what FY26 looks like once the acquisition and the lifted dividend run-rate are layered on.

Quality of result

Earnings quality is mixed

At the FCF level, post-lease free cash flow of $24.8m was essentially flat against $23.7m, with capex steady at around 10.4% of revenue. The cash that the dividend actually draws on did not deteriorate, and FCF covered FY25 NPAT 1.2x — so headline NPAT understates the cash generation.

Two quality signals are negative. First, OCF/EBITDA fell 10 percentage points to 80.9%, so each dollar of EBITDA produced materially less operating cash than a year ago. Second, the gap between EBITDA decline (-2.6%) and NPAT decline (-58.7%) reflects items below EBITDA that the supplied excerpts do not fully reconcile; until those items are decomposed, the durability of the bottom-line read cannot be confirmed.

The revenue mix continues to shift: Sky Box/Pod fell from 65.1% to 62.6% of revenue, while Sky Sport Now (+1.5pp share), Broadband (+1.3pp), and Advertising (+0.6pp) grew. The streaming and broadband transition is continuing but is not yet offsetting linear-TV decline.

Unresolved

Open questions

What specifically drove the gap between the 2.6% EBITDA decline and the 57.9% PBT decline, and how much of it is genuinely non-recurring versus structural?
Why did OCF/EBITDA conversion drop 10 percentage points, and is the cause working-capital timing, programming-rights phasing, or something structural?
How is the FY26 guidance of at least 30 cps reconciled with FY25 NPAT covering only ~14 cps of dividend, and what FCF run-rate underpins it?
What are the terms, consideration, and strategic rationale of the acquisition flagged in the release?
Will the H1-weighted programming cost pattern repeat in FY26, and what does that imply for first-half cash generation against a higher dividend run-rate?

This briefing cannot assess the specific composition of items below EBITDA, the acquisition terms, or whether the FY26 dividend guidance is supported by management's expected free cash flow trajectory.

Chat

Ask about SKT FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Sky Network Television's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SKT FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Sky Network Television's FY25 result.

What specifically drove the gap between the 2.6% EBITDA decline and the 57.9% PBT decline, and how much of it is genuinely non-recurring versus structural?Why does "The earnings collapse below EBITDA is the central question" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for SKT after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report

FY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Market Release

FY25 / results release↗

Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

2024 Annual Report

FY24 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

NZX Results Announcement

FY24 / results release↗

Interim context

2025 Interim Report

HY25 / financial report↗

Investor Presentation

HY25 / results presentation↗

Market release

HY25 / results release↗

Results Announcement

HY25 / results announcement↗

Release context

Sky ASM 2024 - Presentation

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 80.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, -9.9pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 1.2%, with NPAT payout at 149.8%.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -0.22x, +0.03x versus the prior comparable period.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 0.8pp.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SKT publishes next

Get the next Sky Network Television briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.