Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
South Port New Zealand (SPN) / FY21

Record NPAT masks FCF squeeze as dividend tops free cash flow

Headline NPAT rose 13.8% but doubled capex cut pre-lease FCF to $4.7m, leaving the 27.0c full-year dividend at 150.7% of free cash.

Transport & Infrastructure / Ports

SPN revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $34.8m, versus $63.3m in FY25.

SPN EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 44%, versus 40.8% in FY25.

SPN operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $7.6m, versus $23.7m in FY25.

SPN working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 SPN: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $-0.5m; 4-period range $-9.4m to $-6.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-0.5m, unprecedented high; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-7.1m.
  • FY25 SPN: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $-9.4m; 4-period range $-6.5m to $-0.5m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-9.4m, below normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-9.4m, below normal range; 0/4 prior periods had builds, and 4 had releases averaging NZ$-4.9m.
Release date
27 August 2021
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY21 vs FY20

Revenue

$47.3m

+6.1% ↑ vs $44.6m

EBITDA

—

— vs $17.8m

Net profit after tax

$10.7m

+13.8% ↑ vs $9.4m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$15.8m

+25.6% ↑ vs $12.6m

Full-year dividend per share

27.0c

+3.8% ↑ vs 26.0c

Profit before tax

$14.7m

+10.5% ↑ vs $13.3m

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.6m

+32.4% ↑ vs $1.2m

Total assets

$68.7m

+15.6% ↑ vs $59.4m

What changed

South Port delivered a record reported result on the income statement but a noticeably weaker cash picture beneath it

Revenue rose 6.1% to $47.3m, PBT rose 10.5% to $14.7m and NPAT rose 13.8% to $10.7m. Operating cash flow rose 25.6% to $15.8m, helped by a near-complete release of trade debtors (from $6.5m to $0.0m at balance date).

Capital intensity stepped up sharply. Capex roughly doubled to $11.1m (23.5% of revenue, up from 12.3%), so pre-lease free cash flow fell from $7.1m to $4.7m. Gross borrowings rose 38.5% to $9.0m and net debt moved from $5.3m to $7.4m. The full-year dividend increased to 27.0 cps (prior year 26.0 cps), with a 19.5 cps final declared.

What matters

Free cash flow no longer covers the dividend

FCF pre-lease fell to $4.7m while the declared full-year dividend equates to roughly 150.7% of that figure (up from 96.0%) and 66.2% of NPAT (up from 51.5%). This matters because the dividend is now being topped up from the balance sheet rather than funded from current-year cash generation, and the gap has been filled in part by additional borrowings.

The operating cash flow lift is partly working-capital aided. Trade debtors fell from $6.5m to $0.013m, releasing roughly $6.5m of working capital and inflating OCF growth versus the underlying earnings shape. Receivable days collapsed from 53 to under one, which looks more like a balance-date timing or billing-cutoff outcome than a structural collection improvement, and would not be expected to repeat on the same scale.

Capital structure is being used to fund growth investment. Capex grew 101.8% year on year, gross borrowings rose 38.5% and net debt expanded to $7.4m. Leverage is moving in the wrong direction, although off a low base, and equity still grew 8.5% to $49.5m. The read-through is that the next year's cash flow will need to absorb both elevated investment and an above-FCF distribution.

Expectations

No forward targets, FY22 guidance or forward-work disclosures are supplied with this release, so the result can only be judged against shape and prior-period comparisons

The interim split shows HY21 captured 49.4% of full-year revenue but 56.6% of full-year NPAT, implying second-half NPAT of $4.6m versus first-half $6.1m — the earnings cadence softened into the second half despite the cargo surge framing.

What the release does not support is a clean read on whether the doubled capex is a one-year build-out or the start of a multi-year investment programme. That distinction matters for dividend coverage from FY22 onwards.

Quality of result

The reported earnings step-up is genuine at the operating level — PBT rose 10.5% on a 6.1% revenue lift, indicating modest operating leverage

However, NPAT growth of 13.8% is flattered by a lower effective tax rate (27.0% versus 29.4%), so PBT is the cleaner read on operating performance and the headline NPAT growth overstates the operating uplift by roughly three percentage points.

Cash quality is the weaker side of the result. OCF growth of 25.6% outpaced PBT growth largely because of a roughly $6.5m release from trade debtors, which is unlikely to recur at that magnitude. Once capex of $11.1m is deducted, pre-lease FCF of $4.7m converts only 44.0% of NPAT — down from 75.4% — and is insufficient to fund the declared dividend. The combination of a debtor-release-aided OCF, doubled capex, and a dividend exceeding FCF means the apparent earnings strength is balance-sheet-assisted in cash terms.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did trade debtors fall to effectively zero at year end, and how much of the OCF lift is a non-recurring billing or cutoff effect?
Will FY22 capex normalise toward historical levels, or is this the first year of a multi-year investment cycle?
How does the board view dividend sustainability when the declared payout exceeds pre-lease FCF by roughly 50%?
What return profile and timing does management expect from the doubled capex spend?
Will gross borrowings continue to rise to bridge capex and distributions, and what is the internal leverage tolerance?

This briefing cannot assess project-level capex plans, expected returns on the new investment, or any FY22 trading update, because none of that detail is supplied in the release.

Chat

Ask about SPN FY21

Ask follow-up questions about South Port New Zealand's FY21 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SPN FY21

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about South Port New Zealand's FY21 result.

Why did trade debtors fall to effectively zero at year end, and how much of the OCF lift is a non-recurring billing or cutoff effect?Why does "Free cash flow no longer covers the dividend" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY21?What should I watch next for SPN after FY21?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

NZX Release Year End Result - 27 August 2021

FY21 / results presentation↗

Results Announcement - 30 June 2021

FY21 / results announcement↗

Results Announcement - 30 June 2021

FY21 / results release↗

SPNZ FY 21 Financials

FY21 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

AMENDED 2020 Annual Report

FY20 / financial report↗

Interim context

South Port Interim Report to 31 December 2020

HY21 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 66.0% on a NPAT basis, with NPAT payout at 66.2%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 3.3pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 6.1% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 21.6%, +1.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SPN publishes next

Get the next South Port New Zealand briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.