Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Steel & Tube Holdings (STU) / HY24

Distribution profit fell 70% as inventory drawdown cleared all bank debt

Revenue declined 17.0% and NPAT 55.1%, but a $46.4m inventory release funded zero gross borrowings and $26.3m of cash.

Construction & Materials / Steel distribution

STU revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $211.9m, versus $385.4m in FY25.

STU EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was 0.6%, versus -0.6% in FY25.

STU operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $5.6m, versus $10.4m in FY25.

STU working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
HY26 was $20.1m, versus -$4.8m in FY25.
Release date
20 February 2024
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$261.8m

-17.0% ↓ vs $315.3m

EBITDA

$21.2m

-30.6% ↓ vs $30.5m

Net profit after tax

$5.3m

-55.1% ↓ vs $11.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$38.7m

-5.9% ↓ vs $41.1m

Interim dividend per share

4.0c

flat vs 4.0c

Operating profit

$10.2m

-50.0% ↓ vs $20.3m

Profit before tax

$7.5m

-54.5% ↓ vs $16.5m

Cash and cash equivalents

$26.3m

+248.4% ↑ vs $7.5m

What changed

Earnings deteriorated sharply on weaker volumes

Revenue fell 17.0% to $261.8m, EBITDA dropped 30.6% to $21.2m, PBT fell 54.5% to $7.5m and NPAT fell 55.1% to $5.3m. The effective tax rate barely moved (28.6% versus 28.2%), so the operating read tracks the PBT decline rather than tax noise.

The earnings collapse is concentrated in Distribution, where segment result fell from $16.1m to $4.8m on revenue down to $153.1m from $191.6m. Infrastructure went the other way: revenue fell to $108.6m from $123.7m, but segment result rose to $5.4m from $4.2m, lifting Infrastructure's share of mix to 41.5% from 39.2%.

The balance sheet was transformed in parallel. Inventory was cut by $46.4m, gross borrowings of $40.0m were repaid in full, and cash rose to $26.3m from $7.5m. The interim dividend was held flat at 4.0 cps.

What matters

Distribution carried the earnings hit while Infrastructure improved

Distribution revenue fell roughly 20% but its segment result fell about 70%, signalling material operating deleverage in the larger business. Infrastructure produced a higher segment result on lower revenue, which means the group earnings story is a Distribution problem rather than a broad-based slowdown, and the read on the half depends heavily on whether Distribution margins are cyclical or structural.

Operating cash flow held up only because working capital was released. OCF was $38.7m versus $41.1m, so OCF-to-EBITDA rose to 182.9% from 134.9% — but operating working capital fell $55.7m, with inventory days down to 89.5 from 101.0. This matters because the cash story is balance-sheet-assisted: stripping the inventory drawdown, underlying cash generation looks much closer to the EBITDA decline.

The 4.0 cps interim dividend is uncovered by NPAT. Payout against NPAT is 125.0% versus 56.3% a year ago, although it remains covered by pre-lease FCF at a 19.5% payout. If the working capital tailwind reverses, dividend cover narrows quickly.

Expectations

No formal forward-period target is supplied

Management notes the result was above December 2023 guidance on normalised EBIT, and the release describes performance above 2H23 (revenue $273.8m, EBITDA $21.4m), which is the more relevant sequential anchor than HY23.

Annualising the current half implies roughly $523.5m of revenue, against FY23 of $589.1m. HY23 represented 53.5% of FY23 revenue and 58.8% of FY23 EBITDA, so the prior-year shape was first-half weighted; a flat second half on current run-rate would still leave FY24 well below FY23. The release does not provide a full-year revenue or earnings target, so the second-half trajectory and Distribution margin recovery remain the key open variables.

Quality of result

The cash and balance-sheet metrics flatter the underlying earnings deterioration

Pre-lease FCF was $34.3m, equivalent to 640.4% of NPAT, but most of that conversion comes from a $55.7m operating working capital release rather than recurring cash earnings. Capex was light at 1.7% of revenue, which protects near-term FCF but is also a lever that cannot be pulled twice.

The earnings side looks lower quality than headline cash suggests. Operating profit halved, ROE fell to 2.6% from 5.7%, and the Distribution segment result was the dominant driver. Because the cash protection came from inventory being run down to 89.5 days from 101.0, the same engine cannot continue to fund debt reduction or dividends at this rate. Net debt swung from $32.5m to a $26.3m net cash position — genuinely useful financial flexibility — but its origin is a one-time working-capital reset, not a step-up in underlying earnings.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is driving the ~70% fall in Distribution segment result on a 20% revenue decline, and is that operating deleverage volume-led, price-led, or mix-led?
How much further can inventory be reduced from $128.6m, and what is the steady-state inventory days target?
Will the 4.0 cps interim dividend be maintained in a year where NPAT payout is 125.0% and the working capital tailwind cannot repeat?
Why did Infrastructure margins improve while Distribution margins compressed, and is that divergence sustainable into 2H24?
What demand and pricing assumptions underpin the path back to FY23-level EBITDA from the current annualised run-rate?

This briefing cannot assess the durability of Distribution segment margins or the path of New Zealand construction and industrial steel demand into the second half.

Chat

Ask about STU HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Steel & Tube Holdings's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about STU HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Steel & Tube Holdings's HY24 result.

What is driving the ~70% fall in Distribution segment result on a 20% revenue decline, and is that operating deleverage volume-led, price-led, or mix-led?Why does "Distribution carried the earnings hit while Infrastructure improved" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for STU after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Steel & Tube 1H24 Interim Report

HY24 / financial report↗

Steel & Tube 1H24 Results Announcement

HY24 / results announcement↗

Steel & Tube 1H24 Results Media Release

HY24 / media release↗

Steel & Tube 1H24 Results Presentation

HY24 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Steel & Tube 1H23 Interim Report

HY23 / financial report↗

Steel & Tube 1H23 Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

Steel & Tube 1H23 Results Media Release

HY23 / media release↗

Full-year context

Steel & Tube - FY23 Annual Report

FY23 / financial report↗

Steel & Tube - FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results announcement↗

Steel & Tube - FY23 Results Announcement

FY23 / results release↗

Release context

Steel & Tube - Updated Interim Guidance 1H FY24

HY24 / commentary↗

Steel & Tube 2023 Annual Shareholders Meeting - Presentation Slides

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus pre-lease FCF is 19.4%, with NPAT payout at 125.0%.

→

Cash conversion quality

This result converted 182.9% of EBITDA to operating cash flow, +48.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was -17.0% for this reporting period.

→

Leverage and balance-sheet risk

Net debt / EBITDA is -1.20x, -2.30x versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when STU publishes next

Get the next Steel & Tube Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.