Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Summerset Group Holdings (SUM) / FY25

PBT fell 32.2% on smaller revaluation gains; underlying profit up 13%

IFRS earnings dropped on lower investment property fair-value uplifts, masking a 26% jump in unit settlements and 23.7% rise in operating cash flow.

Healthcare / Retirement living

SUM revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $361.8m, versus $173m in HY25.

SUM EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
HY25 was 78.5%, versus 119.4% in FY24.

SUM operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $548.2m, versus $228.7m in HY25.

SUM working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 SUM: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0.4m; 3-period range $1.3m to $2.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.4m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • FY24 SUM: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $2.2m; 3-period range $0.4m to $1.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$2.2m, above normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$2.2m, above normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.1m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
27 February 2026
Published
21 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY25 vs FY24

Revenue

$361.8m

+13.1% ↑ vs $319.9m

Net profit after tax

$259.7m

-23.6% ↓ vs $339.8m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$548.2m

+23.7% ↑ vs $443.2m

Full-year dividend per share

24.5c

flat vs 24.5c

Profit before tax

$241.1m

-32.2% ↓ vs $355.8m

Cash and cash equivalents

$6m

-48.3% ↓ vs $11.7m

Total assets

$9.2b

+14.5% ↑ vs $8.1b

What changed

Statutory earnings fell sharply while operating activity strengthened, which means the headline decline reflects accounting rather than business performance

Profit before tax fell 32.2% to $241.1m and net profit after tax fell 23.6% to $259.7m, even though revenue grew 13.1% to $361.8m and the company's underlying profit measure rose 13% to $234.2m. The gap sits in the investment property fair-value line that flows through IFRS profit at this issuer.

Operationally, 1,560 ORA Operating cash flow settlements were completed, up 26% on FY24's 1,238, and operating cash flow climbed 23.7% to $548.2m. Capex of $647.1m exceeded the prior year's $611.4m, so free cash flow before leases remained negative at -$98.9m. Gross borrowings rose 15% to $2b and cash on hand fell to $6.0m, taking net debt to roughly $2b.

What matters

The IFRS-underlying gap is a revaluation story, not an operating one

Revenue grew 13.1%, unit settlements jumped 26%, and operating cash flow rose 23.7%, so the 32.2% PBT decline reflects a smaller fair-value uplift on investment property versus the prior year. The implication: investors reading the IFRS NPAT line in isolation will overstate any deterioration in the underlying retirement village business.

Tax distortion narrows the apparent NPAT decline. The effective tax rate moved from -4.5% in FY24 (a net tax benefit) to 7.7% in FY25, which is why NPAT fell only 23.6% while PBT fell 32.2%, an 8.6 percentage-point gap. PBT is the cleaner read on the year-over-year direction.

Leverage and capital intensity continue to rise. Capex consumed 178.9% of revenue, gross borrowings grew $257.0m, and ROE fell to 7.8% from 11.4%. The business is funding development through additional debt and DMF/resident loan inflows; cash earnings cover neither the development pipeline nor the dividend without continued borrowing.

Expectations

No formal FY26 financial targets are supplied in the release context, so this briefing assesses the result against the half-year trajectory rather than guidance

H1 FY25 contributed 47.8% of full-year revenue and 49% of NPAT, which is consistent with the company's slightly second-half-weighted shape and indicates that the H2 cadence broadly followed H1's improved sales momentum.

Management commentary in the half-year release flagged improving sales contract rates and growing stock under contract. The full-year volume outcome (1,560 ORA sales vs. 1,238) is consistent with that signal having carried through H2. What the release does not support is any read on the durability of revaluation gains, which drive a large share of reported IFRS profit and which compressed materially in FY25.

Quality of result

The underlying operating result looks durable

Settlement volumes, revenue, and operating cash flow all grew in double digits, and the strong OCF (+23.7%) outpaced revenue growth (+13.1%), so cash generation kept up with reported activity. NTA per share rose to $13.75 from $12.53, a 9.7% increase, reinforcing that book value continued to compound through the year.

Three quality caveats temper the read. First, NPAT was flattered by the effective tax rate moving from -4.5% to 7.7% — the prior comparable benefited from a tax credit, so the headline NPAT change understates the underlying PBT swing. Second, fair-value movements on investment property remain a large and volatile component of IFRS earnings, and FY25's PBT decline largely reflects that volatility rather than operating weakness. Third, free cash flow before leases remained negative at -$98.9m and capex absorbed 178.9% of revenue, so dividend capacity continues to depend on debt drawdowns and DMF inflows rather than on cash earnings from operations.

Unresolved

Open questions

What was the FY25 investment property fair-value uplift, and how much of the PBT decline does it account for relative to other below-the-line items?
Why did the effective tax rate normalise from -4.5% to 7.7%, and is 7.7% representative going forward or itself unusually low?
How does management plan to evolve capex intensity, given $647.1m of capex against $361.8m of revenue and another $257.0m of borrowings drawn?
What is the trajectory of net debt and gearing as the land bank of around 5,500 units is built out, and at what point does development funding capacity constrain pipeline pace?
Is the 24.5 cents full-year dividend sustainable against ROE that has slipped from 11.4% to 7.8% while FCF before leases remains negative?

This briefing cannot assess the components of the investment property fair-value movement, the cost-to-build trajectory by village cohort, or forward unit pricing in either New Zealand or Australia from the disclosures supplied.

Chat

Ask about SUM FY25

Ask follow-up questions about Summerset Group Holdings's FY25 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SUM FY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Summerset Group Holdings's FY25 result.

What was the FY25 investment property fair-value uplift, and how much of the PBT decline does it account for relative to other below-the-line items?Why does "The IFRS-underlying gap is a revaluation story, not an operating one" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY25?What should I watch next for SUM after FY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Annual Report FY25

FY25 / financial report↗

Media Release

FY25 / media release↗

Results Announcement

FY25 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation

FY25 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Annual Report FY24

FY24 / financial report↗

Media Release

FY24 / media release↗

Results Announcement

FY24 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation

FY24 / results presentation↗

Interim context

Half Year Report - 1H25

HY25 / financial report↗

Media Release - 1H25 Results

HY25 / media release↗

Results Announcement - 1H25

HY25 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation - 1H25

HY25 / results presentation↗

Release context

Outcome of Summerset Annual Meeting

HY25 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 8.6pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Company-disclosed payout ratio is 25.3% on a company-disclosed basis, with NPAT payout at n/a.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 13.1% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 7.8%, -3.6pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SUM publishes next

Get the next Summerset Group Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.