Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
Summerset Group Holdings (SUM) / HY24

Revenue up 18.2% but PBT fell 5.7% on 520bps development margin compression

A surge in development capex to $255.6m flipped free cash flow to -$63.9m and pushed net debt to $1,527.3m despite stronger occupation-rights cash

Healthcare / Retirement living

SUM revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was $272.2m, versus $238.7m in FY22.

SUM EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was 165.3%, versus 118.2% in FY22.

SUM operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was $398.2m, versus $369.2m in FY22.

SUM working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY23 SUM: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $0.4m; 3-period range $1.3m to $2.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.4m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.7m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$0.4m, below normal range; 3/3 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$1.7m, and none had a working-capital release.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$1.9b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

7.31x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

1.06

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

0.57x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

3.1%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
26 August 2024
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY24 vs HY23

Revenue

$151.6m

+18.2% ↑ vs $128.2m

Net profit after tax

$102.2m

-23.2% ↓ vs $133.1m

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$191.6m

+30.7% ↑ vs $146.7m

Interim dividend per share

11.3c

flat vs 11.3c

Cash and cash equivalents

$21m

-40.0% ↓ vs $35m

Total assets

$7.4b

+16.9% ↑ vs $6.3b

What changed

Revenue rose 18.2% to $151.6m on 588 occupation-right sales (up from 483), but profit before tax fell 5.7% to $120.8m as the development margin compressed from 33.5% to 28.3%

Reported NPAT fell 23.2% to $102.2m, amplified by a swing in the tax line; PBT is the cleaner read on operating performance.

Operating cash flow rose 30.7% to $191.6m, reflecting strong occupation-rights receipts. However, capex jumped to $255.6m from $29.4m a year earlier, equal to 168.5% of revenue, pushing free cash flow before leases to -$63.9m versus +$117.2m in HY23.

The balance sheet absorbed the funding gap: gross borrowings climbed 19.7% to $1.5b, cash fell 40% to $21.0m, and net debt rose to $1.5b from $1.3b. Total assets reached $7.4bn (+16.9%). The interim dividend was held flat at 11.3 cents per share.

What matters

Development margin compression is the cleanest read on earnings quality

Despite 22% growth in occupation-right sales volume, the development margin fell 520bps to 28.3%, and PBT contracted 5.7% on revenue up 18.2%. This means the unit economics of new village stock weakened materially in the half, and management's 3% growth in underlying profit ($89.9m) relied on volume rather than pricing or cost leverage.

The capex step-up has reshaped the cash profile. Capex rose roughly 768% to $255.6m, and FCF pre-lease swung from +$117.2m to -$63.9m. The 11.3 cent dividend is no longer covered by free cash flow on this measure (FCF/NPAT at -41.5%), and the gap is being funded by debt. Whether this is a one-period concentration of build activity or a durable run-rate matters for leverage and dividend headroom.

Leverage is moving in one direction. Gross borrowings rose $254.5m and net debt rose $268.4m year-on-year, while equity grew 16.9% to $2.7b. ROE fell to 3.8% from 5.8%. The business is scaling its asset base faster than its earnings, which is normal for retirement-village development cycles but tightens the room for any further margin compression.

Expectations

No forward targets or quantitative guidance were supplied with the release

Historical seasonality is meaningful: HY23 represented only 30.5% of FY23 NPAT and 47.1% of FY23 revenue, indicating a second-half-weighted shape driven by occupation-right settlement timing. Annualised, current revenue tracks at roughly $303.3m, broadly in line with FY23's $272.2m, but the FY24 outturn will hinge on second-half settlement volumes and whether development margin stabilises off the 28.3% level.

The release does not support a clean read on full-year earnings direction because development margin trajectory and the timing of the remaining capex programme are both undisclosed.

Quality of result

The reported NPAT decline overstates the operating deterioration: PBT fell 5.7% versus NPAT down 23.2%, a 17.5pp gap driven by the tax line moving from a small benefit in HY23 to an expense in HY24

The underlying-profit measure (+3% to $89.9m) is closer to the operating reality but still trails revenue growth of 18.2%, confirming that margin, not volume, is the issue.

Cash quality is mixed. Operating cash flow of $191.6m is genuinely strong and reflects occupation-right receipts. However, that inflow is being more than absorbed by development spend, so the apparent cash strength does not translate to free cash. Working capital remained orderly (receivable days improved from 57.6 to 55.6, debtors up only 14.1% on revenue up 18.2%), so the cash story is about investment intensity rather than receivables drag. The dividend at 26.0% of NPAT is comfortable on earnings cover but uncovered by free cash this half.

Unresolved

Open questions

Why did development margin compress 520bps to 28.3%, and is this a cost, mix, or pricing effect that persists into 2H24?
How much of the $255.6m capex represents project timing concentration versus a higher ongoing run-rate, and what does FY24 development capex look like in total?
What is the targeted leverage envelope, given net debt has risen $268m year-on-year to $1,527.3m?
Why did the tax line swing from a 3.9% benefit to a 15.4% expense, and is the current effective rate the new normal?
Will the second-half settlement cadence be sufficient to fund the remaining build programme without further drawing on debt facilities?

This briefing cannot assess forward development margin, the unit economics of villages currently under construction, or management's internal capex and leverage targets, because none were disclosed in the supplied release excerpts.

Chat

Ask about SUM HY24

Ask follow-up questions about Summerset Group Holdings's HY24 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about SUM HY24

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Summerset Group Holdings's HY24 result.

Why did development margin compress 520bps to 28.3%, and is this a cost, mix, or pricing effect that persists into 2H24?Why does "Development margin compression is the cleanest read on earnings quality" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY24?What should I watch next for SUM after HY24?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Half Year Report - 1H24

HY24 / financial report↗

Media Release - 1H24 Results

HY24 / media release↗

Results Announcement - 1H24

HY24 / results announcement↗

Results Presentation - 1H24

HY24 / results presentation↗

Prior comparable period

Half Year Report - 1H23

HY23 / financial report↗

Media Release - 1H23 Results

HY23 / media release↗

Results Announcement - 1H23

HY23 / results announcement↗

Full-year context

Annual Report - FY23

FY23 / financial report↗

Media Release - FY23 Results

FY23 / media release↗

Results Announcement - FY23

FY23 / results announcement↗

Release context

Outcome of Summerset Annual Meeting

HY24 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

PBT and NPAT growth diverged by 17.5pp, with a distortion flag in the result.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 18.2% for this reporting period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 26.0%.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 3.8%, -2.0pp versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when SUM publishes next

Get the next Summerset Group Holdings briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.