Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
Third Age Health Services (TAH) / FY22

Cash conversion fell to 90% as acquisitions drove 7.5% revenue growth

Gross margin expanded 300bps to 63% on the GP portfolio shift, but operating cash flow weakened and ROE eased from 73.4% to 50.2%.

Healthcare / Primary healthcare

TAH revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $22.5m, versus $11.5m in FY23.

TAH EBITDA margin

EBITDA margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was 25.6%, versus 13.6% in FY23.

TAH operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY26 was $4m, versus $1.1m in FY23.

TAH working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY23 was $0.8m, versus -$380.5m in HY23.
Release date
30 May 2022
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$5.9m

+7.5% ↑ vs $5.5m

Net profit after tax

$1.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$1.1m

-31.4% ↓ vs $1.6m

Final dividend per share

4.0c

— vs —

Profit before tax

$1.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$1.1m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$4.9m

+37.7% ↑ vs $3.6m

What changed

Operating cash flow fell to $1.1m from $1.6m even as revenue grew 7.5% to $5.9m, lifted by the strategic acquisition of community General Practices and 23.5% growth at the existing Hawkes Bay Wellness Centre

The shift in mix toward the GP portfolio expanded gross margin from 60% to 63%. NPAT reached $1.2m and PBT $1.6m, with the effective tax rate dropping from 32.9% to 24.9% — the bulk of the after-tax earnings movement. The Board declared a 4.05 cps final dividend; cash on hand was $1.1m, down from $1.8m, consistent with acquisition consideration leaving the balance sheet.

What matters

Cash conversion stepped down materially

FCF to NPAT fell from 148.8% in FY21 to 90.4% this year, with capex still negligible at $3k. Receivable days lengthened from 20.9 to 23.9, so part of the gap looks like working-capital absorption from the acquired GP businesses rather than a structural break. This matters because reported earnings now run ahead of cash generation rather than below it, which weakens the read on how much of the headline result is bankable.

Tax distortion flatters the NPAT line. ETR fell roughly 800bps to 24.9%, well below the 28% statutory rate, while PBT was essentially flat. PBT is therefore the cleaner read on underlying operating performance, and the result is more a low-tax outcome than an operating step-up. If the rate normalises in FY23, the NPAT comparable becomes harder.

Acquisition lifts mix but dilutes capital efficiency. The 63% gross margin reflects the GP portfolio carrying a richer margin than aged medical care services NZ, which was the dominant FY21 segment at 86.6% of revenue. ROE eased from 73.4% to 50.2% as equity rose with acquisition-related funding. This matters because the acquired earnings still need to ramp before the larger denominator pays back.

Expectations

No formal FY23 targets were disclosed

The H1 release flagged strategic focus on growing the patient population through acquisitions, with earnings benefits "expected from 2H22"; the full-year shape is consistent with that, with implied H2 revenue of roughly $3.1m and H2 NPAT of about $0.5m. Without disclosed forward work or stated guidance, the FY23 read hinges on integration of the acquired GP operations and whether the lower ETR holds. Anchoring expectations on PBT rather than NPAT matters here because the tax-rate benefit is unlikely to repeat in full.

Quality of result

The headline earnings improvement is heavily tax-assisted: PBT moved very little while the ETR dropped from 32.9% to 24.9%, so the cleaner operating read is closer to flat than the after-tax line suggests

Gross margin expansion to 63% looks more durable provided the GP mix sustains, because it reflects portfolio composition rather than a one-off. Capex of $3k is consistent with an asset-light service model, so FCF tracks OCF very closely.

Cash quality is the weak link. OCF of $1.063m sits below the $1.173m NPAT — a 90.4% conversion versus 148.8% in the prior year — and receivable days lengthened by about three days. The 4.05 cps final dividend absorbs 34.0% of NPAT and 37.7% of FCF; coverage holds, but headroom is narrower than the prior conversion rate would have implied.

Unresolved

Open questions

What organic revenue growth was achieved excluding the GP acquisitions and the 23.5% lift at Hawkes Bay Wellness Centre?
Why did operating cash flow fall despite higher reported earnings, and how much of the gap is integration-related working capital that should reverse?
Will the 24.9% effective tax rate hold into FY23, or should investors model a return toward the 32.9% prior-period rate?
How is the acquired GP portfolio tracking against deal economics, and what further GP acquisitions are in the pipeline?
What ROE trajectory does management see as the acquired earnings ramp against the enlarged equity base?

This briefing cannot assess organic versus inorganic revenue contribution, the sustainability of the lower tax rate, or the consideration paid and integration profile of the acquired GP practices without further disclosure.

Chat

Ask about TAH FY22

Ask follow-up questions about Third Age Health Services's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TAH FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Third Age Health Services's FY22 result.

What organic revenue growth was achieved excluding the GP acquisitions and the 23.5% lift at Hawkes Bay Wellness Centre?Why does "Cash conversion stepped down materially" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for TAH after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Results announcement w unaudited Financial Statements

FY22 / financial report↗

Prior comparable period

Third Aged Health Announces FY2021 Annual Report please see attachment for details

FY21 / financial report↗

Interim context

1H22 Market Announcement

HY22 / results release↗

TAH Interim Financial Statements

HY22 / financial report↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was 50.2%, -23.2pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 34.0%.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 7.5% for this reporting period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TAH publishes next

Get the next Third Age Health Services briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.