Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources
←Back to briefings
T&G Global Limited and subsidiary companies (TGG) / FY23

Operating profit swung to a $45.6m loss; PBT margin hit unprecedented -4.8%

Weather-driven volume damage pushed PBT to -$64.2m as gross borrowings rose 33.9% and equity fell 10.0%.

Primary Industries / Horticulture

TGG revenue trajectory

Revenue context before the current result.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $1.6b, versus $920.6m in HY25.

TGG Operating profit margin

Operating profit margin across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was 3%, versus 2% in HY25.

TGG operating cash flow

Operating cash flow across covered periods.

↗
Loading chart...
FY25 was $91.9m, versus $18.7m in HY25.

TGG working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
  • FY22 TGG: Unprecedented high operating working-capital movement. $123.7m; 4-period range $1.7m to $42.3m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$123.7m, unprecedented high; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$22.8m, and none had a working-capital release.
  • HY23 TGG: Unprecedented low operating working-capital movement. $-44.6m; 4-period range $-14.5m to $42.9m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$-44.6m, unprecedented low; 3/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$32.4m, and 1 had releases averaging NZ$-14.5m.
  • HY24 TGG: Outside range high operating working-capital movement. $42.9m; 4-period range $-44.6m to $36.2m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$42.9m, above normal range; 2/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$27.2m, and 2 had releases averaging NZ$-29.5m.
  • FY25 TGG: Outside range low operating working-capital movement. $1.7m; 4-period range $22.7m to $123.7m. Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.7m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$53.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Operating working-capital movement: NZ$1.7m, below normal range; 4/4 prior periods had builds averaging NZ$53.3m, and none had a working-capital release.
Release date
29 February 2024
Published
22 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Analysis
  3. Chat
  4. Data
  5. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY23 vs FY22

Revenue

$1.3b

+2.3% ↑ vs $1.3b

Net profit after tax

−$51.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$25.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Operating profit

−$45.6m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Profit before tax

−$64.2m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Cash and cash equivalents

$30.5m

-47.9% ↓ vs $58.5m

Total assets

$1.1b

-0.8% ↓ vs $1.1b

What changed

PBT margin collapsed to -4.8% in FY23, materially below Annolyse's historical baseline of 0.3% (range -0.5% to 1.4%) and the weakest in the available record

Operating profit swung from +$20.4m to -$45.6m, a $66.0m deterioration, while PBT moved from -$3.3m to -$64.2m and NPAT from -$5.5m to -$51.2m. Revenue rose modestly to $1.3b from $1.3b, but a basis caveat sits on year-on-year comparability owing to segment composition changes.

The balance sheet absorbed most of the strain. Gross borrowings rose 33.9% to $197.4m, cash fell 47.9% to $30.5m, total equity dropped 10.0% to $521.9m, and NTA per share fell 12.2% to $3.61. Management commentary attributes the result to cyclone-driven volume damage, with strategy delivery delayed "at least 18 months."

What matters

Margins broke through the historical floor, not just dipped

NPAT margin at -3.8% (mean -0.1%) and ROE at -10.1% (mean -0.2%) are both flagged as unprecedented lows in the supplied historical baseline. This matters because the result is not a cyclical dip within a normal band; it is outside the company's recent operating range and concentrated in segments that should be its core engine.

Segment economics tell two stories. The Apples segment (60% of revenue) saw its result fall from $27.8m to $10.6m on a derived margin of 1.3% (prior 3.6%), while VentureFruit swung from an $11.0m profit on $29.1m of revenue to a $14.7m loss on $9.0m of revenue. This means the headline weather narrative coexists with a material revenue collapse in a higher-margin licensing-style segment that needs separate explanation.

Leverage moved decisively in the wrong direction. Net debt nearly doubled to $166.9m from $89.0m, gross borrowings rose by $50.0m, and equity contracted by $58.3m. With FY23 generating only $25.6m of operating cash against $68.5m of capex, the financing gap was bridged on the balance sheet rather than from earnings.

Expectations

No forward target or earnings guidance for FY24 was supplied with this release, so the result cannot be benchmarked against a stated number

The shape data shows HY23 NPAT was -$17.7m and full-year NPAT -$51.2m, implying a roughly -$33.4m second-half loss that was worse than the first half. That weighting matters because it indicates the cyclone impact and weak pricing extended well beyond the immediate event window in February 2023.

Management's commentary points to insurance recovery being recognised in the FY23 result and an "at least 18 months" delay to the strategy. Neither the quantum of the recovery booked nor the path back to historical margin levels is quantified in the supplied context.

Quality of result

Operating cash improved from -$0.5m to $25.6m, but this is not a clean signal of underlying earnings quality

Capex fell 31.5% to $68.5m (5.1% of revenue, down from 7.7%), which directly relieved the cash statement, and the operating working-capital build of $42.3m is within the company's historical range (4-period mean $43.2m). Pre-lease free cash flow of -$42.9m sits at the lower edge of the historical range (mean -$4.3m).

Working-capital line items signal pressure underneath the headline. Trade debtors rose 20.6% to $167.4m on revenue up only 2.3%; debtor days of 45.8 are within Annolyse's historical range (mean 36.3 days) but elevated. Inventory days at 18.5 are above the company's recent normal range (mean 15.0 days). This matters because the cash improvement was assisted by lower capex and the receivables build has not yet converted, so the next period's working-capital reversal cannot be assumed.

Unresolved

Open questions

What insurance recovery has been recognised in FY23, what remains contingent, and what timing does management expect for the balance?
Why did VentureFruit revenue collapse from $29.1m to $9.0m and swing to a $14.7m loss, and is that driver weather-related or structural?
How does the 18-month strategy delay translate into capex, debt, and earnings trajectory through FY24 and FY25?
What headroom remains under banking covenants given net debt rising from $89.0m to $166.9m alongside a -$51.2m NPAT?
Why is the Apples segment derived margin at 1.3% versus 3.6% prior, and how much of that compression is volume versus cost-pass-through?

This briefing cannot assess the size of the insurance recovery already booked, covenant headroom, or any FY24 guidance, because none of those items are present in the supplied release context.

Chat

Ask about TGG FY23

Ask follow-up questions about T&G Global Limited and subsidiary companies's FY23 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TGG FY23

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about T&G Global Limited and subsidiary companies's FY23 result.

What insurance recovery has been recognised in FY23, what remains contingent, and what timing does management expect for the balance?Why does "Margins broke through the historical floor, not just dipped" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY23?What should I watch next for TGG after FY23?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

TGG NZX and Media Announcement 2023 Full Year Results

FY23 / results release↗

TGG NZX Annual Report 2023

FY23 / financial report↗

TGG NZX Results Announcement - 2023 Full Year Results

FY23 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

T&G Annual Report 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

T&G NZX Statement Financial Year 2022

FY22 / results release↗

T&G Results Announcement 2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Interim context

T&G Interim Report June 2023

HY23 / financial report↗

TGG Interim Financial Results Announcement

HY23 / results announcement↗

Release context

FY 2022 Earnings Guidance Update

FY22 / commentary↗

FY2023 Earnings Guidance Update

FY23 / commentary↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -10.1%, -9.1pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 2.3% for this reporting period.

→

Working-capital pressure

Inventory days were 18 days, +3 days versus the prior comparable period.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TGG publishes next

Get the next T&G Global Limited and subsidiary companies briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.