Annolyse
BriefingsCompaniesScreenerInsightsPrinciplesCompareChatWatchlist

Explore

  • Briefings
  • Companies
  • Screener
  • Insights
  • Compare

Resources

  • Search
  • Methodology

© 2026 Annolyse.

ChartsAnalysisChatData
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources
←Back to briefings
TruScreen Group (TRU) / FY22

Revenue grew 48% but FY22 loss widened to $7.9m as cash fell to $2.8m

Operating leverage moved the wrong way in the second half, with the implied H2 loss running roughly five times H1 and cash burn consuming nearly half

Healthcare / Medical diagnostics

TRU working-capital movement

Operating working-capital absorption or release by reporting period.

↗
Loading chart...
FY22 was -$731.8m, versus -$0.1m in HY22.

Market context

Valuation

A close-dated read on what the market price implies next to the latest verified filing inputs. Unavailable metrics stay visible when the absence is useful context.

Prices as at close, 8 June 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$16.3m

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent earnings are negative.

EPS

-0.00

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not available for this company right now.

EV/EBITDA

Not available

i

Not meaningful when recent EBITDA is negative.

P/FCF

Not available

i

Not meaningful when free cash flow is negative or unavailable.

P/B

6.3x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and fund shape

Yield and fund-style valuation where the company shape supports it.

Dividend yield

0.0%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
30 May 2022
Published
23 April 2026
Ask about this result
Sections⌄
  1. Charts
  2. Valuation
  3. Analysis
  4. Chat
  5. Data
  6. Sources

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

FY22 vs FY21

Revenue

$1.7m

+48.2% ↑ vs $1.1m

Net profit after tax

−$7.9m

+99.8% ↑ vs −$3.5b

Net cash inflow from operating activities

−$2.5m

-15.6% ↓ vs −$2.2m

Profit before tax

−$7.9m

+99.8% ↑ vs −$3.5b

Cash and cash equivalents

$2.8m

Suppressed: metric quality flags mark this value as unsuitable for normal comparison.

Total assets

$4.4m

-63.5% ↓ vs $12m

What changed

The reported loss widened sharply even as revenue grew

Net loss after tax was $7.9m versus $3.5m in FY21 (-126.2%), while revenue rose +48.2% to $1.7m. PBT moved with NPAT on a -126.2% basis, because the effective tax rate sat at 0.0% in both periods. Cash on the balance sheet fell from $5.3m to $2.8m, a roughly $2.5m drawdown over the year. Operating cash outflow worsened modestly to -$2.5m from -$2.2m, while capex was effectively nil at $0.003m versus $0.098m prior.

Within the year, the shape skewed adversely. H1 revenue of $0.7m became $1.7m full year (H1 was 44.4% of the year), but H1 NPAT of -$1.3m became -$7.9m full year, implying an H2 loss of -$6.6m — about five times the H1 result on only marginally higher H2 revenue. Trade receivables also emerged at $0.3m from zero.

What matters

Cost base scaled faster than sales

  • Revenue grew $0.5m year-on-year, but the loss expanded by $4.4m. The release attributes deferred sales to Vietnam, Eastern Europe and Russia, plus China lockdowns in Beijing and Shanghai, but those disclosures explain the revenue shortfall rather than the magnitude of the cost-side step-up. This matters because operating leverage at TruScreen's scale should compound positively when product revenue grows 48%, not negatively.
  • Cash runway is now the binding constraint. Closing cash of $2.8m against an FY22 operating-and-capex outflow of roughly $2.5m implies, on a static read, around twelve months of liquidity. With no disclosed borrowings, any acceleration of the operating loss into FY23 likely requires a capital raise or material commercial step-up before the cash position is exhausted.
  • H2 deterioration is the central signal. The implied H2 loss of -$6.6m on $0.9m of H2 revenue is structurally worse than H1 and not consistent with a simple COVID-deferral story, because deferred sales would compress revenue but should not, on their own, multiply the cost line.

Expectations

No quantitative guidance, forward-work disclosure or stated FY23 target is provided in the release, so the result can only be judged against last year and the H1 shape

On both measures it disappoints: the company entered FY22 with H1 revenue +25% and an H1 loss of -$1.3m, and exited with a full-year loss more than six times that H1 figure. Management commentary cites China sales expectations into FY23 alongside deferred Vietnam and Eastern Europe activity, but no value is attached to either pipeline. The release therefore supports a directional reading on commercial activity but not a quantitative one on FY23 earnings.

Quality of result

The revenue line is the most durable element of the result: it is product-driven, up 48.2%, and Single Use Sensor units rose 42% with first sales in Eastern Europe — these are commercial wins rather than accounting effects

Capex at 0.2% of revenue means there is no balance-sheet capitalisation flattering the cost line.

The loss line is harder to read favourably. Cash conversion deteriorated, with operating cash outflow widening despite a smaller capex outlay, and FCF-to-NPAT conversion moved from 65.5% to 32.1%, meaning the loss now consumes more cash per dollar of reported loss than last year. The emergence of $0.3m of trade receivables (receivable days 59.9 versus 2.2) is small in absolute terms but signals a shift from prepaid or cash-on-shipment sales toward credit terms — worth tracking but not yet a working-capital problem at this scale. ROE moved to -232.6% from -30.9%, reflecting both the wider loss and a smaller equity base.

Unresolved

Open questions

What is management's expected monthly cash burn into FY23, and at what point would a capital raise be required?
Why did the H2 loss expand to roughly five times the H1 loss on only modestly higher H2 revenue?
How much of the deferred Vietnam, Eastern Europe and Russia revenue is contractually committed versus pipeline?
What is the expected China sales trajectory once the Beijing and Shanghai lockdowns lift, and is any of it underwritten?
Will the cost base be repositioned to match the current revenue scale, or is continued investment ahead of revenue the explicit strategy?

This briefing cannot assess management's internal cash-runway view, deferred-sales conversion timing, or any FY23 trading already in hand, because none of those are disclosed in the release.

Chat

Ask about TRU FY22

Ask follow-up questions about TruScreen Group's FY22 result.

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Ask about TRU FY22

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about TruScreen Group's FY22 result.

What is management's expected monthly cash burn into FY23, and at what point would a capital raise be required?Why does "Cost base scaled faster than sales" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in FY22?What should I watch next for TRU after FY22?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Truscreen Preliminary Final Report March 2022

FY22 / financial report↗

Truscreen Results Announcement March 2022

FY22 / results release↗

Truscreen Results Announcement Summary March 2022

FY22 / results announcement↗

Prior comparable period

Financial Results Announcement March 2021

FY21 / results announcement↗

Financial Results Announcement March 2021

FY21 / results release↗

Truscreen Preliminary Final Report March 2021

FY21 / financial report↗

Interim context

TruScreen Half Year Report September 2021

HY22 / financial report↗

TruScreen Results Announcement Template September 2021

HY22 / results announcement↗

TruScreen Results Announcement Template September 2021

HY22 / results release↗

Related insights

Cross-company views selected from the metrics in this briefing.

Revenue growth context

Revenue growth was 48.2% for this reporting period.

→

ROE and capital efficiency

ROE was -232.6%, -201.7pp versus the prior comparable period.

→

Dividend coverage and payout pressure

Dividend payout versus NPAT is 0.0%.

→

Earnings quality and statutory distortions

This result includes a statutory earnings-quality distortion flag.

→
This briefing is based on available company filings and standard Annolyse calculations. It is general information only and does not constitute financial advice. The analysis may contain errors. Always read the original company filings and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.

Get notified when TRU publishes next

Get the next TruScreen Group briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.