Skip to main content

Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

PBT down 64% on a 13% revenue decline as operating leverage bites

Operating cash flow of $80.7m and a held 2.5 cent interim dividend partially cushion an earnings collapse driven by trading headwinds.

VSL metric context

No comparable metric history is available for this result.

Not enough chartable history yet. This panel will populate as comparable periods are published.

Market context

Valuation

These ratios pair a market close from around the result date with verified filing data. An unavailable metric means the required inputs were missing or unsuitable for comparison.

Prices as at close, 3 September 2026

Price and market cap

The latest close and share count context for the market price.

Market cap

$1b

i

End-of-day close multiplied by current shares on issue.

Profitability multiples

How the market price compares with recent earnings and cash-flow inputs.

P/E

70.39x

i

Recent market cap compared with trailing earnings.

EPS

0.10

i

Recent filing-derived earnings per share.

PEG

Not available

i

Not meaningful without positive comparable earnings growth.

EV/EBITDA

11.48x

i

Enterprise value compared with recent EBITDA.

P/FCF

25.2x

i

Market cap compared with recent free cash flow.

P/B

3.61x

i

Market value compared with latest reported equity.

Income and investment-company measures

Yield and investment-company valuation where supported.

Dividend yield

0.8%

i

Trailing dividends compared with the latest close.

Total return

Not available

i

Available once dividend and adjustment data are verified.

Release date
11 February 2025
Published
23 April 2026

Key metrics

Numbers worth scanning first

HY25 vs HY24

Revenue

$493m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

EBITDA

$56.9m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net profit after tax

$9.2m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Net cash inflow from operating activities

$80.7m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Interim dividend per share

2.5c

flat vs 2.5c

Total assets

$877.1m

Caveat: metric quality flags apply; use this value with basis context.

Analysis ofVSL HY25Result releasedAnnolyse analysis published

What changed

HY25 shows substantial operating-leverage compression

Revenue fell 13% to $493.0m (HY24: $564.0m), EBITDA before significant items dropped 30% to $56.9m (HY24: $81.8m), and profit before tax before significant items fell 64% to $13.7m (HY24: $38.5m). Reported NPAT was $9.2m. Operating cash flow held at $80.7m — materially above EBITDA — and the interim dividend was maintained at 2.5 cents per share. Cash on hand sat at $9.0m against gross borrowings of $250.5m. Trade receivables fell to $121.1m from $144.8m, consistent with a destocking and working-capital release pattern.

What matters

Operating leverage worked in reverse

A 13% revenue decline drove a 30% EBITDA decline and a 64% PBT decline. This compression cadence signals a high-fixed-cost steel and metals distribution model where modest revenue swings produce amplified earnings swings. The release does not separate volume, price and cost-absorption effects, which limits the read on whether margin pressure or pure volume loss dominates.

Cash conversion masked earnings weakness. OCF-to-EBITDA of 141.9% reflects working-capital release more than underlying cash earning power. The 16% drop in receivables, plus implied inventory drawdown, produced a non-recurring cash tailwind. Once destocking ends, operating cash flow should re-converge toward EBITDA — which is itself running well below HY24.

Capital allocation remains intact but tighter. Net debt sits near $241.5m and capex of $14.1m equals 2.9% of revenue, consistent with cyclical caution. The 2.5 cent interim DPS is 35.7% of NPAT and is comfortably covered by pre-lease FCF of $66.6m. The dividend is sustainable on current cash, but it depends on working-capital release that is not durable.

Expectations

No quantitative FY25 guidance was issued

Management's language that "priorities remain unchanged for the second half" signals no structural change to trading conditions, which implies H2 looks more like H1 than a recovery. With no second-half shape context supplied, investors cannot assume mechanical H2 improvement. Operating leverage runs both directions, so even modest revenue stabilization is needed for meaningful earnings recovery from this base. This matters because at the H1 run-rate, leverage and dividend coverage are adequate but carry less margin for error than HY24 conditions provided.

Quality of result

Reported earnings show the steel and metals cycle bottoming through Vulcan's fixed-cost base

NPAT of $9.2m is real but compressed; the business is producing far less EBITDA per dollar of revenue than in HY24. Cash quality is the headline good news at $80.7m OCF, but it is largely working-capital-financed. FCF-to-NPAT of 725.7% is a mathematical distortion — it tells you cash exceeded reported profit because receivables and inventory funded the gap, not that earnings quality is unusually high.

Capex at 2.9% of revenue signals maintenance-level reinvestment rather than expansion, which protects near-term cash but defers any decision about growth investment until trading visibility improves. Dividend coverage today is comfortable, but durability depends on whether H2 EBITDA holds at H1 levels and whether working-capital release continues. If destocking ends without revenue recovery, both reported earnings and cash will weaken together, which is the central risk in extrapolating this result.

Unresolved

Open questions

How much of the 30% EBITDA decline reflects volume versus price and margin compression, and how does it split between the Steel and Metals segments?
What inventory level does management consider through-cycle normal, and how much further working-capital release remains available?
What fixed-cost actions are being taken, and how sensitive is the cost base to a further 5–10% revenue decline?
What net debt-to-EBITDA threshold would prompt a review of dividend policy?
Why was no FY25 guidance provided, and what specific conditions would trigger a forward outlook?

This briefing cannot assess segment-level margin movement, end-market demand by customer vertical, or the timing at which working-capital release ends.

Ask about VSL HY25

Informational only. No buy, sell, hold, price-target, or personal financial advice.

Sign in to chat

Sign in to ask questions about Vulcan Steel's HY25 result.

How much of the 30% EBITDA decline reflects volume versus price and margin compression, and how does it split between the Steel and Metals segments?Why does "Operating leverage worked in reverse" matter?How strong was the cash and earnings quality in HY25?What should I watch next for VSL after HY25?

Checking account...

Data appendix

Show segment detail

Open to load segment breakdown.

Show analytical metrics

Open to load analytical metrics.

Show key metrics table

Open to load key metrics.

Sources

Current period

Half Year Report and Accounts

HY25 / financial report

Prior comparable period

Half Year Report and Accounts

HY24 / financial report

Release context

Half Year Report 2025 Investor presentation

HY25 / commentary

Get notified when VSL publishes next

Get the next Vulcan Steel briefing and related NZX reporting-season updates by email.