NZX company comparison
Compare NZX companies side by side
Select two or three covered companies to compare their latest source-backed financial metrics, reporting periods, and analytical context.
Australian Foundation Investment Company (AFI)Barramundi (BRM)Kingfish (KFL)
Showing 3 companies.
← Swipe to view more
| Metric | AFI · FY26 | BRM · FY26 | KFL · FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.1m | -$39.4m | -$8.3m |
| Revenue growth % | -33.4% | -912.2% | -179.7%Outside range low revenue growth. -179.7%; 4-period range n/m. Revenue growth: -179.7%, below normal range; 4-period mean 682.5%, range n/m. |
| PBT | $318.2m | — | — |
| PBT growth % | 3.9% | — | — |
| NPAT | $293.1m | -$42.9m | -$13.6m |
| NPAT growth % | 2.8% | — | — |
| Operating cash flow | $280.5m | — | — |
| FCF pre-lease | $280.4m | — | — |
| DPS | — | 1.1c | 2.5c |
| ROE % | 3.6% | — | — |
| Net debt | -$89.5m | — | — |
| Total assets | $9.8b | — | $31m |
Source: latest published result for each selected company.
AFI vs BRM vs KFL comparison
Copy, export, or share this public comparison table.
Get updates for AFI vs BRM vs KFL
Get new briefings that refresh this comparison when covered companies publish.